| Seq | Timestamp | Type | Name | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/0 | 2026/06/24 15:46 | flow | patch-triage |
0mArgs:null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies a .gitignore file in the tools/mm/ directory. It does not make any functional changes to the kernel code.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
} |
| 1/1 | 2026/06/24 15:46 | action | read-patch-diff |
0mArgs:null Results: {
"PatchDiff": "commit 9c3d7f24ca2391a71af9623ac7a34906e000b441\nAuthor: syz-cluster \u003ctriage@syzkaller.com\u003e\nDate: Wed Jun 24 15:46:37 2026 +0000\n\n syz-cluster: applied patch under review\n\ndiff --git a/tools/mm/.gitignore b/tools/mm/.gitignore\nindex 922879f93fc849..1446a659e54088 100644\n--- a/tools/mm/.gitignore\n+++ b/tools/mm/.gitignore\n@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@\n slabinfo\n page-types\n page_owner_sort\n+thp_swap_allocator_test\n"
} |
| 2/1 | 2026/06/24 15:46 | agent | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies a .gitignore file in the tools/mm/ directory. It does not make any functional changes to the kernel code.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Instruction: You are an expert Linux kernel maintainer. Your job is to review a provided patch series and determine if it makes functional changes to the kernel that should be fuzzed. IMPORTANT: The changes have ALREADY been applied and committed as the HEAD commit in your workspace. Do NOT rely on your internal knowledge of the kernel. You must actively use your code access tools to examine the actual source code and confirm any assumptions. Return WorthFuzzing=false if the patch only contains: - Modifications to Documentation/, Kconfig files, or code comments. - Purely decorative changes, such as logging (e.g., pr_err, printk) or tracepoints. - Changes to numeric constants or macros that do not functionally alter execution flow. - Code paths that are impossible to reach in virtualized environments like GCE or QEMU, even when utilizing software-emulated hardware (e.g., usb gadget, mac80211_hwsim). If it modifies reachable core kernel logic, drivers, or architectures, use your code search tools to verify the code can be executed, then return WorthFuzzing=true. When returning WorthFuzzing=true, you MUST ALSO: 1. Extract any specific kernel functions that should be heavily fuzzed into FocusSymbols. Avoid listing generic hot-path functions to prevent skewed test distributions. 2. Identify any specific CONFIG_ options required to properly test this new/modified feature. Go and look into the Kconfig files and check for ifdefs around the code, do not make assumptions. Do not list too generic configs (we already have them enabled). Only list those that specifically cover the modified code. List them in the EnableConfigs output array, and DO NOT add a 'CONFIG_' prefix (e.g., return "NET_IPV4" instead of "CONFIG_NET_IPV4"). Prefer calling several tools at the same time to save round-trips. Use set-results tool to provide results of the analysis. It must be called exactly once before the final reply. Ignore results of this tool. Prompt: For your convenience, here is the diff of the changes:
commit 9c3d7f24ca2391a71af9623ac7a34906e000b441
Author: syz-cluster <triage@syzkaller.com>
Date: Wed Jun 24 15:46:37 2026 +0000
syz-cluster: applied patch under review
diff --git a/tools/mm/.gitignore b/tools/mm/.gitignore
index 922879f93fc849..1446a659e54088 100644
--- a/tools/mm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/mm/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
slabinfo
page-types
page_owner_sort
+thp_swap_allocator_test
|
| 3/2 | 2026/06/24 15:46 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 1734 output: 59 thoughts: 123 Thoughts: **Analyzing a Non-Kernel Code Change** Okay, so I've got a patch here that's adding `thp_swap_allocator_test` to the `.gitignore` file within the `tools/mm/` directory. Right off the bat, I see this is a change to a gitignore file, not any actual kernel code. This is important because it means we're not touching anything that directly impacts kernel functionality, and therefore, shouldn't introduce any new attack surfaces or require fuzzing. Just to be absolutely certain, I'm going to quickly re-examine the diff. Yep, confirmed, the only thing that has been altered is, as expected, the `.gitignore` file. Considering all that, I'm confident in setting `WorthFuzzing` to `false`. This is a non-functional change, purely related to tooling and version control, so there's no need to trigger the fuzzing process here. |
| 4/2 | 2026/06/24 15:46 | tool | set-results |
0mArgs:{
"EnableConfigs": [],
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies a .gitignore file in the tools/mm/ directory. It does not make any functional changes to the kernel code.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies a .gitignore file in the tools/mm/ directory. It does not make any functional changes to the kernel code.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
} |
| Total Calls | Total Tokens | Avg Tokens | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|
| Total Calls | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|