loop8: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
ocfs2: Mounting device (7,8) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.16.0-rc5-syzkaller-00193-g40f92e79b0aa-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.8.3627/15341 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880377cddf8 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888123082950 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_this_handle+0x1f87/0x21c0

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       start_this_handle+0x1fa7/0x21c0
       jbd2__journal_start+0x2c1/0x5b0
       jbd2_journal_start+0x2a/0x40
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x376/0x6d0
       ocfs2_shutdown_local_alloc+0x200/0xa10
       ocfs2_dismount_volume+0x201/0x8d0
       generic_shutdown_super+0x135/0x2c0
       kill_block_super+0x44/0x90
       deactivate_locked_super+0xbc/0x130
       cleanup_mnt+0x425/0x4c0
       task_work_run+0x1d4/0x260
       exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xec/0x110
       do_syscall_64+0x2bd/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #3 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_read+0x46/0x2e0
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x36a/0x6d0
       ocfs2_shutdown_local_alloc+0x200/0xa10
       ocfs2_dismount_volume+0x201/0x8d0
       generic_shutdown_super+0x135/0x2c0
       kill_block_super+0x44/0x90
       deactivate_locked_super+0xbc/0x130
       cleanup_mnt+0x425/0x4c0
       task_work_run+0x1d4/0x260
       exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xec/0x110
       do_syscall_64+0x2bd/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #2 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x26b/0x6d0
       ocfs2_create_refcount_tree+0x349/0x1250
       ocfs2_reflink_remap_blocks+0x2ea/0x1930
       ocfs2_remap_file_range+0x4b7/0x730
       vfs_copy_file_range+0xd56/0x1310
       __se_sys_copy_file_range+0x2fb/0x470
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#5){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_write+0x96/0x1f0
       ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x15e/0x4640
       ocfs2_reserve_new_metadata_blocks+0x403/0x940
       ocfs2_init_xattr_set_ctxt+0x307/0x700
       ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb70/0x11f0
       __vfs_setxattr+0x43c/0x480
       __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x12d/0x660
       vfs_setxattr+0x16b/0x2f0
       filename_setxattr+0x274/0x600
       path_setxattrat+0x364/0x3a0
       __x64_sys_setxattr+0xbc/0xe0
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{4:4}:
       validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140
       __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_read+0x46/0x2e0
       ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720
       ocfs2_mknod+0x1321/0x2050
       ocfs2_mkdir+0x191/0x440
       vfs_mkdir+0x306/0x510
       do_mkdirat+0x247/0x590
       __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &oi->ip_xattr_sem --> &journal->j_trans_barrier --> jbd2_handle

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(jbd2_handle);
                               lock(&journal->j_trans_barrier);
                               lock(jbd2_handle);
  rlock(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

8 locks held by syz.8.3627/15341:
 #0: ffff8881270b6428 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90
 #1: ffff8880377ce0c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#9/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: filename_create+0x1f9/0x470
 #2: ffff888029fc5240 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#4){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x15e/0x4640
 #3: ffff8880377cd240 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#5){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x15e/0x4640
 #4: ffff888029fc09c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[args->fi_sysfile_type]#6){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_local_alloc_bits+0x125/0x24e0
 #5: ffff8881270b6618 (sb_internal#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ocfs2_mknod+0xe93/0x2050
 #6: ffff88803c3c90e8 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_start_trans+0x36a/0x6d0
 #7: ffff888123082950 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_this_handle+0x1f87/0x21c0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15341 Comm: syz.8.3627 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc5-syzkaller-00193-g40f92e79b0aa-dirty #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250
 print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310
 check_noncircular+0x134/0x160
 validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140
 __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20
 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
 down_read+0x46/0x2e0
 ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720
 ocfs2_mknod+0x1321/0x2050
 ocfs2_mkdir+0x191/0x440
 vfs_mkdir+0x306/0x510
 do_mkdirat+0x247/0x590
 __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0
 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f517e78e929
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f517f5f6038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000102
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f517e9b5fa0 RCX: 00007f517e78e929
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000200000002040 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c
RBP: 00007f517e810b39 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f517e9b5fa0 R15: 00007ffc98fdb4b8
 </TASK>
