======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.9.492/10331 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888020864f78 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888114244950 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_this_handle+0x1f87/0x21c0

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       start_this_handle+0x1fa7/0x21c0
       jbd2__journal_start+0x2c1/0x5b0
       jbd2_journal_start+0x2a/0x40
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x376/0x6d0
       ocfs2_modify_bh+0xe8/0x470
       ocfs2_local_read_info+0x1465/0x17e0
       dquot_load_quota_sb+0x791/0xbd0
       dquot_load_quota_inode+0x2e1/0x5d0
       ocfs2_enable_quotas+0x1c6/0x450
       ocfs2_fill_super+0x50fe/0x63c0
       get_tree_bdev_flags+0x40e/0x4d0
       vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2b0
       do_new_mount+0x302/0xa10
       __se_sys_mount+0x313/0x410
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #3 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_read+0x46/0x2e0
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x36a/0x6d0
       ocfs2_modify_bh+0xe8/0x470
       ocfs2_local_read_info+0x1465/0x17e0
       dquot_load_quota_sb+0x791/0xbd0
       dquot_load_quota_inode+0x2e1/0x5d0
       ocfs2_enable_quotas+0x1c6/0x450
       ocfs2_fill_super+0x50fe/0x63c0
       get_tree_bdev_flags+0x40e/0x4d0
       vfs_get_tree+0x92/0x2b0
       do_new_mount+0x302/0xa10
       __se_sys_mount+0x313/0x410
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #2 (sb_internal#5){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x26b/0x6d0
       ocfs2_setattr+0x103e/0x1b40
       notify_change+0xc1a/0xf40
       chown_common+0x40c/0x5c0
       do_fchownat+0x161/0x270
       __x64_sys_lchown+0x85/0xa0
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (&ocfs2_file_ip_alloc_sem_key){++++}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_write+0x96/0x1f0
       ocfs2_try_remove_refcount_tree+0xb6/0x320
       ocfs2_truncate_file+0xda0/0x1420
       ocfs2_setattr+0x1520/0x1b40
       notify_change+0xc1a/0xf40
       do_truncate+0x1a4/0x220
       path_openat+0x306c/0x3830
       do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410
       do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0
       __x64_sys_open+0x11e/0x150
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{4:4}:
       validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140
       __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_read+0x46/0x2e0
       ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720
       ocfs2_mknod+0x1321/0x2050
       ocfs2_create+0x1a5/0x440
       path_openat+0x14f4/0x3830
       do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410
       do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0
       __x64_sys_open+0x11e/0x150
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &oi->ip_xattr_sem --> &journal->j_trans_barrier --> jbd2_handle

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(jbd2_handle);
                               lock(&journal->j_trans_barrier);
                               lock(jbd2_handle);
  rlock(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

8 locks held by syz.9.492/10331:
 #0: ffff8880121e4420 (sb_writers#22){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90
 #1: ffff888020865240 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#16){++++}-{4:4}, at: path_openat+0x8da/0x3830
 #2: ffff888020a509c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[INODE_ALLOC_SYSTEM_INODE]){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x15e/0x4640
 #3: ffff888020866f40 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[EXTENT_ALLOC_SYSTEM_INODE]){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x15e/0x4640
 #4: ffff888020a543c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[LOCAL_ALLOC_SYSTEM_INODE]){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_local_alloc_bits+0x125/0x24e0
 #5: ffff8880121e4610 (sb_internal#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ocfs2_mknod+0xe93/0x2050
 #6: ffff88810cfb1ce8 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_start_trans+0x36a/0x6d0
 #7: ffff888114244950 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_this_handle+0x1f87/0x21c0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10331 Comm: syz.9.492 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250
 print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310
 check_noncircular+0x134/0x160
 validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140
 __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20
 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
 down_read+0x46/0x2e0
 ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720
 ocfs2_mknod+0x1321/0x2050
 ocfs2_create+0x1a5/0x440
 path_openat+0x14f4/0x3830
 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410
 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0
 __x64_sys_open+0x11e/0x150
 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7ffa76b8f6c9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffa77aa2038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffa76de5fa0 RCX: 00007ffa76b8f6c9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000400141042 RDI: 0000200000000080
RBP: 00007ffa76c11f91 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffa76de6038 R14: 00007ffa76de5fa0 R15: 00007ffffbbf8b18
 </TASK>
