| Seq | Timestamp | Type | Name | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/0 | 2026/09/03 10:32 | flow | patch-triage |
0mArgs:null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"KMSANReasoning": "",
"NeedsKMSAN": false,
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst to fix a typo in documentation. It contains no functional code changes.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
} |
| 1/1 | 2026/09/03 10:32 | action | read-patch-diff |
0mArgs:null Results: {
"PatchDiff": "commit 5fb6c69bd2cfa59e2c3ac92fe675f8b1a94a69c6\nAuthor: syz-cluster \u003ctriage@syzkaller.com\u003e\nDate: Thu Sep 3 10:32:09 2026 +0000\n\n syz-cluster: applied patch under review\n\ndiff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst\nindex 844d65eb47a5f..1598cf555bfa8 100644\n--- a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst\n+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst\n@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ prototypes::\n \tint (*d_init)(struct dentry *);\n \tvoid (*d_release)(struct dentry *);\n \tvoid (*d_iput)(struct dentry *, struct inode *);\n-\tchar *(*d_dname)((struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);\n+\tchar *(*d_dname)(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);\n \tstruct vfsmount *(*d_automount)(struct path *path);\n \tint (*d_manage)(const struct path *, bool);\n \tstruct dentry *(*d_real)(struct dentry *, enum d_real_type type);\n"
} |
| 2/1 | 2026/09/03 10:32 | agent | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:core Args: null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst to fix a typo in documentation. It contains no functional code changes.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Instruction: You are an expert Linux kernel maintainer. Your job is to review a provided patch series and determine if it makes functional changes to the kernel that should be fuzzed. IMPORTANT: The changes have ALREADY been applied and committed as the HEAD commit in your workspace. Do NOT rely on your internal knowledge of the kernel. You must actively use your code access tools to examine the actual source code and confirm any assumptions. Return WorthFuzzing=false if the patch only contains: - Modifications to Documentation/, Kconfig files, or code comments. - Purely decorative changes, such as logging (e.g., pr_err, printk) or tracepoints. - Changes to numeric constants or macros that do not functionally alter execution flow. - Code paths that are impossible to reach in virtualized environments like GCE or QEMU, even when utilizing software-emulated hardware (e.g., usb gadget, mac80211_hwsim). - Code in vendor-specific PCIe switch, SmartNIC, or GPU drivers (e.g., mlxsw, pds_core, qed, ionic, amdgpu) that require physical PCIe hardware cards not emulated in standard QEMU. - Driver .remove, .shutdown, or pci_unregister_driver teardown callbacks (e.g., igb_remove) that are executed only during PCI hot-unplug or sysfs driver unbind operations. If it modifies reachable core kernel logic, drivers, or architectures, use your code search tools to verify the code can be executed, then return WorthFuzzing=true. When returning WorthFuzzing=true, you MUST ALSO: 1. Extract any specific kernel functions that should be heavily fuzzed into FocusSymbols. Avoid listing generic hot-path functions to prevent skewed test distributions. Prefer non-static, non-inlined API entrypoint functions over internal static helper functions (which are inlined by the compiler and do not have distinct symbol addresses). 2. Identify any specific CONFIG_ options required to properly test this new/modified feature. Go and look into the Kconfig files and check for ifdefs around the code, do not make assumptions. Also check "depends on" lines in Kconfig to include any non-standard parent subsystem configs needed for Kbuild to compile the code statically into vmlinux. List them in the EnableConfigs output array, and DO NOT add a 'CONFIG_' prefix (e.g., return "NET_IPV4" instead of "CONFIG_NET_IPV4"). Prefer calling several tools at the same time to save round-trips. Use set-results tool to provide results of the analysis. It must be called exactly once before the final reply. Ignore results of this tool. Prompt: For your convenience, here is the diff of the changes:
commit 5fb6c69bd2cfa59e2c3ac92fe675f8b1a94a69c6
Author: syz-cluster <triage@syzkaller.com>
Date: Thu Sep 3 10:32:09 2026 +0000
syz-cluster: applied patch under review
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
index 844d65eb47a5f..1598cf555bfa8 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ prototypes::
int (*d_init)(struct dentry *);
void (*d_release)(struct dentry *);
void (*d_iput)(struct dentry *, struct inode *);
- char *(*d_dname)((struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);
+ char *(*d_dname)(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);
struct vfsmount *(*d_automount)(struct path *path);
int (*d_manage)(const struct path *, bool);
struct dentry *(*d_real)(struct dentry *, enum d_real_type type);
|
| 3/2 | 2026/09/03 10:32 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.7-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 2120 output: 57 thoughts: 184 Thoughts: **Analyzing a Minor Documentation Fix** Okay, so this patch is super straightforward. I've got a single file touched: `Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst`. Seems like it's a simple typo fix within that file, specifically a missing `*` in a function signature: `char *(*d_dname)((struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);` -> `char *(*d_dname)(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);`. No code changes, just a documentation update. Now, according to the guidelines, if a patch *only* contains modifications to Documentation, Kconfig files, or comments, we should mark `WorthFuzzing=false`. I always make sure though, just to be completely certain that there aren't any sneaky changes hiding anywhere. Let's do a quick scan of the commit and, if needed, the tree, but the diff seems pretty conclusive that it's *just* the documentation file. I could fire up `read-file` or `grepper` but the diff is pretty crystal clear. Alright, sounds like we can go ahead and call `set-results` directly. This one's an easy call. |
| 4/2 | 2026/09/03 10:32 | tool | set-results |
0mArgs:{
"EnableConfigs": [],
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst to fix a typo in documentation. It contains no functional code changes.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch only modifies Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst to fix a typo in documentation. It contains no functional code changes.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
} |
| 5/1 | 2026/09/03 10:32 | action | If |
0mArgs:{
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Results: null |
| Total Calls | Total Tokens | Avg Tokens | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|
| Total Calls | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|