| Seq | Timestamp | Type | Name | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/0 | 2026/09/18 09:32 | flow | patch-triage |
1mArgs:null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"KMSANReasoning": "",
"NeedsKMSAN": false,
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies error checking and division logic in stm32_adc_read_raw in drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c. This is a platform driver for the internal ADC on STMicroelectronics STM32 SoCs (ARM/ARM64). The driver requires STM32 SoC hardware, parent core devices, and device tree configurations that cannot be emulated or probed in standard virtualized QEMU/GCE test environments on the amd64 target architecture. As the modified code is structurally unreachable hardware code, it does not warrant fuzzing.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
} |
| 1/1 | 2026/09/18 09:32 | action | read-patch-diff |
0mArgs:null Results: {
"PatchDiff": "commit 585e4e449c8e404ddb100ecb174ee852d6d00e0b\nAuthor: syz-cluster \u003ctriage@syzkaller.com\u003e\nDate: Fri Sep 18 09:32:51 2026 +0000\n\n syz-cluster: applied patch under review\n\ndiff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c\nindex 5c6c06b269be6..cac9b18770a5f 100644\n--- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c\n+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c\n@@ -1608,11 +1608,16 @@ static int stm32_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n \t\t\tret = stm32_adc_single_conv(indio_dev, chan, val);\n \t\telse\n \t\t\tret = -EINVAL;\n+\t\tiio_device_release_direct(indio_dev);\n+\t\tif (ret \u003c 0)\n+\t\t\treturn ret;\n \n-\t\tif (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)\n+\t\tif (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) {\n+\t\t\tif (*val == 0)\n+\t\t\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n \t\t\t*val = STM32_ADC_VREFINT_VOLTAGE * adc-\u003evrefint.vrefint_cal / *val;\n+\t\t}\n \n-\t\tiio_device_release_direct(indio_dev);\n \t\treturn ret;\n \n \tcase IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:\n"
} |
| 2/1 | 2026/09/18 09:32 | agent | patch-evaluator |
1mModel:core Args: null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies error checking and division logic in stm32_adc_read_raw in drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c. This is a platform driver for the internal ADC on STMicroelectronics STM32 SoCs (ARM/ARM64). The driver requires STM32 SoC hardware, parent core devices, and device tree configurations that cannot be emulated or probed in standard virtualized QEMU/GCE test environments on the amd64 target architecture. As the modified code is structurally unreachable hardware code, it does not warrant fuzzing.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Instruction: You are an expert Linux kernel maintainer and security engineer.
Your job is to review a provided patch series and evaluate whether it warrants fuzzing with syzkaller.
IMPORTANT: The changes have ALREADY been applied and committed as the HEAD commit in
your workspace. Do NOT rely on internal assumptions. You must actively use your code access
tools to inspect the actual source code, callers, and surrounding context.
================================================================================
1. CORE TRIAGE PHILOSOPHY
================================================================================
The goal of patch fuzzing is to discover crashes, regressions, exposed latent bugs,
and newly triggered assertions introduced by the patch series.
- REACHABILITY IS THE PRIMARY GATE:
Fuzzing can only discover bugs in code that can actually execute in standard virtualized
environments (GCE or QEMU, utilizing software-emulated devices like USB gadgets, netdev, tun/tap).
If the modified code is structurally unreachable (see Section 2), it MUST NOT be fuzzed,
regardless of whether it adds assertions or complex logic.
- DO NOT BLINDLY TRUST "NO FUNCTIONAL CHANGE" (NFCI) OR "REFACTORING" CLAIMS:
Patch authors routinely label changes as "cleanups", "refactorings", or state
"No functional change intended". Do NOT take these claims at face value.
Code refactorings that rearrange logic, introduce helper functions, or alter state management
in core subsystems frequently introduce subtle semantic shifts or uncover latent kernel bugs.
If reachable executable code is modified or refactored, it MUST be fuzzed.
- NEW OR MODIFIED ASSERTIONS IN REACHABLE CODE MUST BE FUZZED:
When a patch introduces or modifies runtime checks or assertions (e.g., WARN_ON*, VM_WARN_ON*,
BUG_ON*, lockdep_assert*) in reachable code paths, it enforces new or stricter invariants.
Even if the author believes the invariant always holds, fuzzing is essential to verify whether
an unusual sequence of operations can violate it.
================================================================================
2. WHEN TO RETURN WorthFuzzing=false (NEGATIVE CRITERIA)
================================================================================
Return WorthFuzzing=false ONLY IF all modified code falls strictly into one or more of these categories:
- Non-kernel and non-executable changes:
* Modifications to Documentation/, comments, or spelling fixes.
* User-space directories, self-tests, samples, or scripts (e.g., tools/, samples/, scripts/, usr/)
that do not affect the compiled kernel image (vmlinux) or kernel modules.
* Purely decorative logging (e.g., message strings in pr_err, printk, dev_info) or tracepoints
that do not alter control flow or data structures.
* Build system or Kconfig changes that do not alter compiled C logic.
- Structurally unreachable hardware:
* Vendor-specific PCIe switches, SmartNICs, or GPU drivers (e.g., mlxsw, pds_core, qed,
ionic, amdgpu) requiring physical ASIC/PCIe cards not emulated in standard QEMU.
- Unreachable execution paths:
* Driver teardown callbacks (.remove, .shutdown, pci_unregister_driver) executed only during
physical PCI hot-unplug or manual sysfs driver unbinding.
* Code paths exclusive to architectures other than the target architecture.
================================================================================
3. WHEN TO RETURN WorthFuzzing=true (POSITIVE CRITERIA)
================================================================================
Return WorthFuzzing=true whenever the patch touches reachable executable code, including:
- Core Subsystems:
* Any logic modifications in memory management (mm/), synchronization/locking (kernel/locking/),
BPF, scheduler, core networking, VFS, or syscall handling.
- Refactorings and Code Cleanups:
* Any restructuring of reachable data structures, helper abstractions, or algorithm flows.
- Runtime Assertions and Defensive Checks:
* Any introduction or alteration of assertions (WARN_ON*, VM_WARN_ON*, BUG_ON*, etc.) in reachable paths.
- Reachable Drivers and Protocols:
* Drivers accessible via virtual buses (virtio, USB gadget, loopback, netlink, binder, sockets, etc.).
================================================================================
4. EXTRACTING FocusSymbols (PREVENTING DILUTION)
================================================================================
When WorthFuzzing=true, you must extract specific kernel functions into FocusSymbols to guide the fuzzer:
- AVOID UBIQUITOUS LIFECYCLE HOT-PATHS:
Do NOT list generic, ubiquitous functions called by almost every program in the corpus
(including, but not limited to: general memory allocators and deallocators, page fault
and trap handlers, or core synchronization primitives; this is not an exhaustive list).
Listing ubiquitous functions causes the fuzzer to classify thousands of unrelated tests as "focused",
which severely dilutes fuzzing effort away from the actual changes.
- TARGET SPECIFIC FEATURE LOGIC AND ENTRYPOINTS:
List functions that specifically implement the logic being added or altered, or direct API entrypoints
for the subsystem feature under review.
- HANDLING STATIC INLINE FUNCTIONS IN HEADERS (.h):
Compiler-inlined static functions (such as static inlines in mm/*.h or include/linux/*.h) lack
distinct symbol addresses in vmlinux and cannot be targeted directly by symbol coverage filters.
If the changes are primarily in static inline helpers, identify non-static, feature-specific caller
functions in .c files that exercise them (avoiding ubiquitous lifecycle wrappers).
================================================================================
5. IDENTIFYING EnableConfigs
================================================================================
Identify any specific CONFIG_ options required to properly compile and reach the modified code:
- Inspect Kconfig files and #ifdef guards; do not make assumptions.
- Check "depends on" lines in Kconfig to include any non-standard parent subsystem configs needed.
- Strip any 'CONFIG_' prefix (e.g., return "NET_IPV4" instead of "CONFIG_NET_IPV4").
Prefer calling several tools at the same time to save round-trips.
Use set-results tool to provide results of the analysis.
It must be called exactly once before the final reply.
Ignore results of this tool.
Prompt: Target architecture: amd64
For your convenience, here is the diff of the changes:
commit 585e4e449c8e404ddb100ecb174ee852d6d00e0b
Author: syz-cluster <triage@syzkaller.com>
Date: Fri Sep 18 09:32:51 2026 +0000
syz-cluster: applied patch under review
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
index 5c6c06b269be6..cac9b18770a5f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
@@ -1608,11 +1608,16 @@ static int stm32_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
ret = stm32_adc_single_conv(indio_dev, chan, val);
else
ret = -EINVAL;
+ iio_device_release_direct(indio_dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
- if (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED)
+ if (mask == IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) {
+ if (*val == 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
*val = STM32_ADC_VREFINT_VOLTAGE * adc->vrefint.vrefint_cal / *val;
+ }
- iio_device_release_direct(indio_dev);
return ret;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
|
| 3/2 | 2026/09/18 09:32 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.8-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 3018 output: 32 thoughts: 98 Thoughts: **Analyzing a Driver Patch** Okay, let's dive into this. The first thing that jumps out is that we're dealing with a patch that touches `drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c`. Specifically, the modification is within `stm32_adc_read_raw`. That's the function we need to focus on. My initial thought is to quickly understand the target platform. I'll need to check the Kconfig associated with this driver to identify the hardware or architecture it's intended for. Since I don't see it immediately, I'm thinking a quick `grepper` run or a thorough examination of the Kconfig file should do the trick. Knowing the target architecture (amd64, as I see now!) will help me quickly understand the context of the modification and if it's even relevant to the system I am working with. |
| 4/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "STM32_ADC",
"PathPrefix": "drivers/iio/adc/"
}Results: {
"Output": "drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig=1559=config SD_ADC_MODULATOR\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig-1570-\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig:1571:config STM32_ADC_CORE\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig-1572-\ttristate \"STMicroelectronics STM32 adc core\"\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig-1587-\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig:1588:config STM32_ADC\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig-1589-\ttristate \"STMicroelectronics STM32 adc\"\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig:1590:\tdepends on STM32_ADC_CORE\ndrivers/iio/adc/Kconfig-1591-\thelp\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/Makefile=137=obj-$(CONFIG_SPEAR_ADC) += spear_adc.o\ndrivers/iio/adc/Makefile:138:obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_ADC_CORE) += stm32-adc-core.o\ndrivers/iio/adc/Makefile:139:obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_ADC) += stm32-adc.o\ndrivers/iio/adc/Makefile-140-obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_DFSDM_ADC) += stm32-dfsdm-adc.o\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-31-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:32:#define STM32_ADC_CORE_SLEEP_DELAY_MS\t2000\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-33-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c=54=struct stm32_adc_common_regs {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-56-\tu32 ccr;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:57:\tu32 eoc_msk[STM32_ADC_MAX_ADCS];\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:58:\tu32 ovr_msk[STM32_ADC_MAX_ADCS];\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-59-\tu32 ier;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c=104=struct stm32_adc_priv {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:105:\tint\t\t\t\tirq[STM32_ADC_MAX_ADCS];\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-106-\tunsigned int\t\t\tnb_adc_max;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c=330=static const struct stm32_adc_common_regs stm32mp13_adc_common_regs = {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-338-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:339:static const unsigned int stm32_adc_offset[STM32_ADC_MAX_ADCS] = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:340:\t0, STM32_ADC_OFFSET, STM32_ADC_OFFSET * 2,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-341-};\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c=407=static int stm32_adc_irq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-423-\tpriv-\u003edomain = irq_domain_create_simple(dev_fwnode(\u0026pdev-\u003edev),\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:424:\t\t\t\t\t\tSTM32_ADC_MAX_ADCS, 0,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-425-\t\t\t\t\t\t\u0026stm32_adc_domain_ops,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c=704=static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-755-\tpm_runtime_set_active(dev);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c:756:\tpm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, STM32_ADC_CORE_SLEEP_DELAY_MS);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c-757-\tpm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev);\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-9-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:10:#ifndef __STM32_ADC_H\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:11:#define __STM32_ADC_H\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-12-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-30-/* Maximum ADC instances number per ADC block for all supported SoCs */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:31:#define STM32_ADC_MAX_ADCS\t\t3\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:32:#define STM32_ADC_OFFSET\t\t0x100\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:33:#define STM32_ADCX_COMN_OFFSET\t\t0x300\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-34-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-53-/* STM32F4 - common registers for all ADC instances: 1, 2 \u0026 3 */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:54:#define STM32F4_ADC_CSR\t\t\t(STM32_ADCX_COMN_OFFSET + 0x00)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:55:#define STM32F4_ADC_CCR\t\t\t(STM32_ADCX_COMN_OFFSET + 0x04)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-56-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-124-/* STM32H7 - common registers for all ADC instances */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:125:#define STM32H7_ADC_CSR\t\t\t(STM32_ADCX_COMN_OFFSET + 0x00)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h:126:#define STM32H7_ADC_CCR\t\t\t(STM32_ADCX_COMN_OFFSET + 0x08)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.h-127-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-38-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:39:#define STM32_ADC_CH_MAX\t\t20\t/* max number of channels */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:40:#define STM32_ADC_CH_SZ\t\t\t16\t/* max channel name size */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:41:#define STM32_ADC_MAX_SQ\t\t16\t/* SQ1..SQ16 */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:42:#define STM32_ADC_MAX_SMP\t\t7\t/* SMPx range is [0..7] */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:43:#define STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US\t\t100000\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:44:#define STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT\t(msecs_to_jiffies(STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US / 1000))\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:45:#define STM32_ADC_HW_STOP_DELAY_MS\t100\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:46:#define STM32_ADC_VREFINT_VOLTAGE\t3300\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-47-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=83=enum stm32_adc_int_ch {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:84:\tSTM32_ADC_INT_CH_NONE = -1,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:85:\tSTM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCORE,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:86:\tSTM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCPU,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:87:\tSTM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDQ_DDR,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:88:\tSTM32_ADC_INT_CH_VREFINT,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:89:\tSTM32_ADC_INT_CH_VBAT,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:90:\tSTM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-91-};\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=98=struct stm32_adc_ic {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-102-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:103:static const struct stm32_adc_ic stm32_adc_ic[STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB] = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:104:\t{ \"vddcore\", STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCORE },\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:105:\t{ \"vddcpu\", STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCPU },\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:106:\t{ \"vddq_ddr\", STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDQ_DDR },\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:107:\t{ \"vrefint\", STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VREFINT },\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:108:\t{ \"vbat\", STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VBAT },\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-109-};\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=264=struct stm32_adc {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-268-\tstruct completion\tcompletion;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:269:\tu16\t\t\tbuffer[STM32_ADC_MAX_SQ + 4] __aligned(8);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-270-\tstruct clk\t\t*clk;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-285-\tstruct stm32_adc_vrefint vrefint;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:286:\tchar\t\t\tchan_name[STM32_ADC_CH_MAX][STM32_ADC_CH_SZ];\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-287-\tu32\t\t\tnum_diff;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:288:\tint\t\t\tint_ch[STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB];\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-289-\tint\t\t\tnsmps;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=340=static const struct stm32_adc_info stm32h7_adc_info = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:341:\t.max_channels = STM32_ADC_CH_MAX,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-342-\t.resolutions = stm32h7_adc_resolutions,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=349=static const struct stm32_adc_info stm32mp13_adc_info = {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-361- */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:362:static const struct stm32_adc_regs stm32f4_sq[STM32_ADC_MAX_SQ + 1] = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-363-\t/* L: len bit field description to be kept as first element */\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=408=static const struct stm32_adc_regs stm32f4_smp_bits[] = {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-432-/* STM32F4 programmable sampling time (ADC clock cycles) */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:433:static const unsigned int stm32f4_adc_smp_cycles[STM32_ADC_MAX_SMP + 1] = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-434-\t3, 15, 28, 56, 84, 112, 144, 480,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=437=static const struct stm32_adc_regspec stm32f4_adc_regspec = {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-451-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:452:static const struct stm32_adc_regs stm32h7_sq[STM32_ADC_MAX_SQ + 1] = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-453-\t/* L: len bit field description to be kept as first element */\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=501=static const struct stm32_adc_regs stm32h7_smp_bits[] = {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-526-/* STM32H7 programmable sampling time (ADC clock cycles, rounded down) */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:527:static const unsigned int stm32h7_adc_smp_cycles[STM32_ADC_MAX_SMP + 1] = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-528-\t1, 2, 8, 16, 32, 64, 387, 810,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=531=static const struct stm32_adc_regspec stm32h7_adc_regspec = {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-547-/* STM32MP13 programmable sampling time (ADC clock cycles, rounded down) */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:548:static const unsigned int stm32mp13_adc_smp_cycles[STM32_ADC_MAX_SMP + 1] = {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-549-\t2, 6, 12, 24, 47, 92, 247, 640,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=736=static void stm32_adc_int_ch_enable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-740-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:741:\tfor (i = 0; i \u003c STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB; i++) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:742:\t\tif (adc-\u003eint_ch[i] == STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NONE)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-743-\t\t\tcontinue;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-745-\t\tswitch (i) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:746:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCORE:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-747-\t\t\tdev_dbg(\u0026indio_dev-\u003edev, \"Enable VDDCore\\n\");\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-750-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:751:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCPU:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-752-\t\t\tdev_dbg(\u0026indio_dev-\u003edev, \"Enable VDDCPU\\n\");\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-755-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:756:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDQ_DDR:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-757-\t\t\tdev_dbg(\u0026indio_dev-\u003edev, \"Enable VDDQ_DDR\\n\");\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-760-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:761:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VREFINT:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-762-\t\t\tdev_dbg(\u0026indio_dev-\u003edev, \"Enable VREFInt\\n\");\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-765-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:766:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VBAT:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-767-\t\t\tdev_dbg(\u0026indio_dev-\u003edev, \"Enable VBAT\\n\");\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=775=static void stm32_adc_int_ch_disable(struct stm32_adc *adc)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-778-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:779:\tfor (i = 0; i \u003c STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB; i++) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:780:\t\tif (adc-\u003eint_ch[i] == STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NONE)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-781-\t\t\tcontinue;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-783-\t\tswitch (i) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:784:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCORE:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-785-\t\t\tstm32_adc_clr_bits(adc, adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eor_vddcore.reg,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-787-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:788:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCPU:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-789-\t\t\tstm32_adc_clr_bits(adc, adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eor_vddcpu.reg,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-791-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:792:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDQ_DDR:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-793-\t\t\tstm32_adc_clr_bits(adc, adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eor_vddq_ddr.reg,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-795-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:796:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VREFINT:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-797-\t\t\tstm32_adc_clr_bits_common(adc, adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eccr_vref.reg,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-799-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:800:\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VBAT:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-801-\t\t\tstm32_adc_clr_bits_common(adc, adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eccr_vbat.reg,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=878=static void stm32h7_adc_stop_conv(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-887-\t\t\t\t\t !(val \u0026 (STM32H7_ADSTART)),\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:888:\t\t\t\t\t 100, STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-889-\tif (ret)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=964=static int stm32h7_adc_exit_pwr_down(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-985-\t\t\t\t\t val \u0026 STM32MP1_VREGREADY, 100,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:986:\t\t\t\t\t STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-987-\tif (ret) {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=1004=static int stm32h7_adc_enable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1014-\t\t\t\t\t val \u0026 STM32H7_ADRDY,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1015:\t\t\t\t\t 100, STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1016-\tif (ret) {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=1027=static void stm32h7_adc_disable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1039-\t\t\t\t\t !(val \u0026 STM32H7_ADEN), 100,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1040:\t\t\t\t\t STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1041-\tif (ret)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=1050=static int stm32h7_adc_read_selfcalib(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1064-\t\t\t\t\t\t !(val \u0026 lincalrdyw_mask),\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1065:\t\t\t\t\t\t 100, STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1066-\t\tif (ret) {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=1087=static int stm32h7_adc_restore_selfcalib(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1104-\t\t\t\t\t\t val \u0026 lincalrdyw_mask,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1105:\t\t\t\t\t\t 100, STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1106-\t\tif (ret) {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1120-\t\t\t\t\t\t !(val \u0026 lincalrdyw_mask),\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1121:\t\t\t\t\t\t 100, STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT_US);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1122-\t\tif (ret) {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=1323=static int stm32_adc_conf_scan_seq(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1342-\t\ti++;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1343:\t\tif (i \u003e STM32_ADC_MAX_SQ)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1344-\t\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=1476=static int stm32_adc_single_conv(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1515-\ttime_left = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1516:\t\t\t\t\t\u0026adc-\u003ecompletion, STM32_ADC_TIMEOUT);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1517-\tif (time_left == 0) {\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=1595=static int stm32_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1617-\t\t\t\treturn -EINVAL;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:1618:\t\t\t*val = STM32_ADC_VREFINT_VOLTAGE * adc-\u003evrefint.vrefint_cal / *val;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-1619-\t\t}\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2061=static void stm32_adc_smpr_init(struct stm32_adc *adc, int channel, u32 smp_ns)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2070-\t */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2071:\tfor (i = 0; i \u003c STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB; i++)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2072:\t\tif (channel == adc-\u003eint_ch[i] \u0026\u0026 adc-\u003eint_ch[i] != STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NONE)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2073-\t\t\tsmp_ns = max(smp_ns, adc-\u003ecfg-\u003ets_int_ch[i]);\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2076-\tperiod_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / adc-\u003ecommon-\u003erate;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2077:\tfor (smp = 0; smp \u003c= STM32_ADC_MAX_SMP; smp++)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2078-\t\tif ((period_ns * adc-\u003ecfg-\u003esmp_cycles[smp]) \u003e= smp_ns)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2079-\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2080:\tif (smp \u003e STM32_ADC_MAX_SMP)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2081:\t\tsmp = STM32_ADC_MAX_SMP;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2082-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2087=static void stm32_adc_chan_init_one(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2098-\t\tchan-\u003echannel2 = vinn;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2099:\t\tsnprintf(name, STM32_ADC_CH_SZ, \"in%d-in%d\", vinp, vinn);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2100-\t} else {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2101:\t\tsnprintf(name, STM32_ADC_CH_SZ, \"in%d\", vinp);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2102-\t}\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2105-\tchan-\u003eindexed = 1;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2106:\tif (chan-\u003echannel == adc-\u003eint_ch[STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VREFINT])\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2107-\t\tchan-\u003einfo_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED);\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2173=static int stm32_adc_legacy_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2178-\tconst struct stm32_adc_info *adc_info = adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eadc_info;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2179:\tstruct stm32_adc_diff_channel diff[STM32_ADC_CH_MAX];\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2180-\tstruct device *dev = \u0026indio_dev-\u003edev;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2184-\tint scan_index = 0, ret, i, c;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2185:\tu32 smp = 0, smps[STM32_ADC_CH_MAX], chans[STM32_ADC_CH_MAX];\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2186-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2262=static int stm32_adc_populate_int_ch(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const char *ch_name,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2268-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2269:\tfor (i = 0; i \u003c STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB; i++) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2270:\t\tif (!strncmp(stm32_adc_ic[i].name, ch_name, STM32_ADC_CH_SZ)) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2271-\t\t\t/* Check internal channel availability */\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2272-\t\t\tswitch (i) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2273:\t\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCORE:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2274-\t\t\t\tif (!adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eor_vddcore.reg)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2277-\t\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2278:\t\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDCPU:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2279-\t\t\t\tif (!adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eor_vddcpu.reg)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2282-\t\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2283:\t\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VDDQ_DDR:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2284-\t\t\t\tif (!adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eor_vddq_ddr.reg)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2287-\t\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2288:\t\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VREFINT:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2289-\t\t\t\tif (!adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eccr_vref.reg)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2292-\t\t\t\tbreak;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2293:\t\t\tcase STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VBAT:\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2294-\t\t\t\tif (!adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eregs-\u003eccr_vbat.reg)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2299-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2300:\t\t\tif (stm32_adc_ic[i].idx != STM32_ADC_INT_CH_VREFINT) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2301-\t\t\t\tadc-\u003eint_ch[i] = chan;\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2326=static int stm32_adc_generic_chan_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2345-\t\tif (!ret) {\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2346:\t\t\tif (strlen(name) \u003e= STM32_ADC_CH_SZ)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2347-\t\t\t\treturn dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2348-\t\t\t\t\t\t \"Label %s exceeds %d characters\\n\",\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2349:\t\t\t\t\t\t name, STM32_ADC_CH_SZ);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2350-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2351:\t\t\tstrscpy(adc-\u003echan_name[val], name, STM32_ADC_CH_SZ);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2352-\t\t\tret = stm32_adc_populate_int_ch(indio_dev, name, val);\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2399=static int stm32_adc_chan_fw_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool timestamping)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2406-\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2407:\tfor (i = 0; i \u003c STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB; i++)\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2408:\t\tadc-\u003eint_ch[i] = STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NONE;\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2409-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2506=static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2592-\tpm_runtime_set_active(dev);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2593:\tpm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, STM32_ADC_HW_STOP_DELAY_MS);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2594-\tpm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev);\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2712=static const unsigned int stm32_adc_min_ts_h7[] = { 0, 0, 0, 4300, 9000 };\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2713:static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_adc_min_ts_h7) == STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2714-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2733=static const unsigned int stm32_adc_min_ts_mp1[] = { 100, 100, 100, 4300, 9800 };\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2734:static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_adc_min_ts_mp1) == STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2735-\n--\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c=2755=static const unsigned int stm32_adc_min_ts_mp13[] = { 100, 0, 0, 4300, 9800 };\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c:2756:static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_adc_min_ts_mp13) == STM32_ADC_INT_CH_NB);\ndrivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c-2757-\n"
} |
| 5/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.8-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 13411 output: 38 thoughts: 28 Thoughts: Here's my take on those thoughts, tailored for an expert audience: **Diving into the ADC Configuration** Alright, let's see... I need to get a handle on how this ADC is configured. My initial instinct is to go straight to the heart of the matter – the Kconfig file for Industrial I/O ADC drivers. Specifically, I'm thinking lines 1570 through 1600. That range is usually where the meat of the configuration options, dependencies, and perhaps some default settings for a key driver, are defined. I expect to find the usual suspects: feature enable/disable flags, maybe some hardware-specific selections, dependencies on other sub-systems or supporting drivers, and definitely some hints on how the ADC core interacts with the wider I/O framework. I'm hoping it'll provide a clear picture of how to manage this ADC's behavior at compile time, and expose the right knobs for my current project. Let's dig in and see if my assumptions hold true. |
| 6/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig",
"FirstLine": 1570,
"LineCount": 40
}Results: {
"Contents": "1570:\t\n1571:\tconfig STM32_ADC_CORE\n1572:\t\ttristate \"STMicroelectronics STM32 adc core\"\n1573:\t\tdepends on ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST\n1574:\t\tdepends on OF\n1575:\t\tdepends on REGULATOR\n1576:\t\tdepends on HAS_IOMEM\n1577:\t\tselect IIO_BUFFER\n1578:\t\tselect MFD_STM32_TIMERS\n1579:\t\tselect IIO_STM32_TIMER_TRIGGER\n1580:\t\tselect IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER\n1581:\t\thelp\n1582:\t\t Select this option to enable the core driver for STMicroelectronics\n1583:\t\t STM32 analog-to-digital converter (ADC).\n1584:\t\n1585:\t\t This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module\n1586:\t\t will be called stm32-adc-core.\n1587:\t\n1588:\tconfig STM32_ADC\n1589:\t\ttristate \"STMicroelectronics STM32 adc\"\n1590:\t\tdepends on STM32_ADC_CORE\n1591:\t\thelp\n1592:\t\t Say yes here to build support for STMicroelectronics stm32 Analog\n1593:\t\t to Digital Converter (ADC).\n1594:\t\n1595:\t\t This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module\n1596:\t\t will be called stm32-adc.\n1597:\t\n1598:\tconfig STM32_DFSDM_CORE\n1599:\t\ttristate \"STMicroelectronics STM32 DFSDM core\"\n1600:\t\tdepends on (ARCH_STM32 \u0026\u0026 OF) || COMPILE_TEST\n1601:\t\tselect REGMAP\n1602:\t\tselect REGMAP_MMIO\n1603:\t\thelp\n1604:\t\t Select this option to enable the driver for STMicroelectronics\n1605:\t\t STM32 digital filter for sigma delta converter.\n1606:\t\n1607:\t\t This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module\n1608:\t\t will be called stm32-dfsdm-core.\n1609:\t\n"
} |
| 7/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.8-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 14305 output: 43 thoughts: 81 Thoughts: **Analyzing the STM32 ADC Driver Dependencies and Probe Process** Okay, so the `STM32_ADC_CORE` module relies on either an STM32 architecture or a compilation test being enabled, along with the `OF` configuration. Interesting. Time to dig deeper into how this `stm32-adc` is initialized. Ah, it's a platform driver! That's my starting point. Now, I need to look closely at the probe routine and how it handles device tree matching. Gotta examine the code, starting with `stm32-adc.c` and also checking `stm32-adc-core.c` to see how everything fits together. I need to understand the device tree integration and ensure proper initialization. |
| 8/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c",
"FirstLine": 2780,
"LineCount": 50
}Results: {
"Contents": "2780:\tMODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_adc_of_match);\n2781:\t\n2782:\tstatic struct platform_driver stm32_adc_driver = {\n2783:\t\t.probe = stm32_adc_probe,\n2784:\t\t.remove = stm32_adc_remove,\n2785:\t\t.driver = {\n2786:\t\t\t.name = \"stm32-adc\",\n2787:\t\t\t.of_match_table = stm32_adc_of_match,\n2788:\t\t\t.pm = pm_ptr(\u0026stm32_adc_pm_ops),\n2789:\t\t},\n2790:\t};\n2791:\tmodule_platform_driver(stm32_adc_driver);\n2792:\t\n2793:\tMODULE_AUTHOR(\"Fabrice Gasnier \u003cfabrice.gasnier@st.com\u003e\");\n2794:\tMODULE_DESCRIPTION(\"STMicroelectronics STM32 ADC IIO driver\");\n2795:\tMODULE_LICENSE(\"GPL v2\");\n2796:\tMODULE_ALIAS(\"platform:stm32-adc\");\n"
} |
| 9/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.8-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 14894 output: 43 thoughts: 453 Thoughts: **My Assessment of the `stm32_adc_driver`'s Fuzzability** Okay, so I'm looking at this `stm32_adc_driver`, a platform driver for STM32's ADC hardware. The first question is always: can this even *be* reached in a standard virtualized environment like GCE or, more likely, QEMU? I need to figure out if it's even *possible* to trigger this on my amd64 target. The STM32 is an ARM-based SoC from STMicroelectronics, like the F4, H7, MP1 series, or the Cortex-M/A families. So, the key is whether QEMU, running on x86_64, can effectively emulate, instantiate, or probe this specific ADC hardware. I need to know if this device can be configured via Device Tree overlays, platform devices, sysfs, or *anything* that allows access on an amd64 host. Wait, I need to remember the core triage philosophy, specifically the criteria for returning a "WorthFuzzing=false". One point jumps out: "Structurally unreachable hardware." Is the STM32 ADC hardware *structurally unreachable* on amd64? This is the crucial question! I need to understand how the `stm32-adc` device can even be instantiated. I'll need to research what `ARCH_STM32` is. Can Syzkaller even probe this? Let's get more detail from what `stm32_adc_probe` does. Let's read the code. |
| 10/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c",
"FirstLine": 2506,
"LineCount": 80
}Results: {
"Contents": "2506:\tstatic int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)\n2507:\t{\n2508:\t\tstruct iio_dev *indio_dev;\n2509:\t\tstruct device *dev = \u0026pdev-\u003edev;\n2510:\t\tirqreturn_t (*handler)(int irq, void *p) = NULL;\n2511:\t\tstruct stm32_adc *adc;\n2512:\t\tbool timestamping = false;\n2513:\t\tint ret;\n2514:\t\n2515:\t\tindio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, sizeof(*adc));\n2516:\t\tif (!indio_dev)\n2517:\t\t\treturn -ENOMEM;\n2518:\t\n2519:\t\tadc = iio_priv(indio_dev);\n2520:\t\tadc-\u003ecommon = dev_get_drvdata(pdev-\u003edev.parent);\n2521:\t\tspin_lock_init(\u0026adc-\u003elock);\n2522:\t\tinit_completion(\u0026adc-\u003ecompletion);\n2523:\t\tadc-\u003ecfg = device_get_match_data(dev);\n2524:\t\n2525:\t\tindio_dev-\u003ename = dev_name(\u0026pdev-\u003edev);\n2526:\t\tdevice_set_node(\u0026indio_dev-\u003edev, dev_fwnode(\u0026pdev-\u003edev));\n2527:\t\tindio_dev-\u003einfo = \u0026stm32_adc_iio_info;\n2528:\t\tindio_dev-\u003emodes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE | INDIO_HARDWARE_TRIGGERED;\n2529:\t\n2530:\t\tplatform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);\n2531:\t\n2532:\t\tret = device_property_read_u32(dev, \"reg\", \u0026adc-\u003eoffset);\n2533:\t\tif (ret != 0) {\n2534:\t\t\tdev_err(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, \"missing reg property\\n\");\n2535:\t\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n2536:\t\t}\n2537:\t\n2538:\t\tadc-\u003eirq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);\n2539:\t\tif (adc-\u003eirq \u003c 0)\n2540:\t\t\treturn adc-\u003eirq;\n2541:\t\n2542:\t\tret = devm_request_threaded_irq(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, adc-\u003eirq, stm32_adc_isr,\n2543:\t\t\t\t\t\tstm32_adc_threaded_isr,\n2544:\t\t\t\t\t\t0, pdev-\u003ename, indio_dev);\n2545:\t\tif (ret) {\n2546:\t\t\tdev_err(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, \"failed to request IRQ\\n\");\n2547:\t\t\treturn ret;\n2548:\t\t}\n2549:\t\n2550:\t\tadc-\u003eclk = devm_clk_get(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, NULL);\n2551:\t\tif (IS_ERR(adc-\u003eclk)) {\n2552:\t\t\tret = PTR_ERR(adc-\u003eclk);\n2553:\t\t\tif (ret == -ENOENT \u0026\u0026 !adc-\u003ecfg-\u003eclk_required) {\n2554:\t\t\t\tadc-\u003eclk = NULL;\n2555:\t\t\t} else {\n2556:\t\t\t\tdev_err(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, \"Can't get clock\\n\");\n2557:\t\t\t\treturn ret;\n2558:\t\t\t}\n2559:\t\t}\n2560:\t\n2561:\t\tret = stm32_adc_fw_get_resolution(indio_dev);\n2562:\t\tif (ret \u003c 0)\n2563:\t\t\treturn ret;\n2564:\t\n2565:\t\tret = stm32_adc_dma_request(dev, indio_dev);\n2566:\t\tif (ret \u003c 0)\n2567:\t\t\treturn ret;\n2568:\t\n2569:\t\tif (!adc-\u003edma_chan) {\n2570:\t\t\t/* For PIO mode only, iio_pollfunc_store_time stores a timestamp\n2571:\t\t\t * in the primary trigger IRQ handler and stm32_adc_trigger_handler\n2572:\t\t\t * runs in the IRQ thread to push out buffer along with timestamp.\n2573:\t\t\t */\n2574:\t\t\thandler = \u0026stm32_adc_trigger_handler;\n2575:\t\t\ttimestamping = true;\n2576:\t\t}\n2577:\t\n2578:\t\tret = stm32_adc_chan_fw_init(indio_dev, timestamping);\n2579:\t\tif (ret \u003c 0)\n2580:\t\t\tgoto err_dma_disable;\n2581:\t\n2582:\t\tret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev,\n2583:\t\t\t\t\t\t \u0026iio_pollfunc_store_time, handler,\n2584:\t\t\t\t\t\t \u0026stm32_adc_buffer_setup_ops);\n2585:\t\tif (ret) {\n"
} |
| 11/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.8-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 17062 output: 44 thoughts: 69 Thoughts: **Digging into the ADC Driver Structure** Okay, here's what's going through my head as I'm looking at this ADC driver code. Line 2520 of the `stm32-adc` driver is immediately catching my attention. The `adc->common = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);` line is telling me something crucial about the device hierarchy. It's clearly establishing that the `stm32-adc` device is a *child* of the `stm32-adc-core` device! This suggests a parent-child relationship, and that `stm32-adc-core` is likely providing some core functionality or shared resources to the `stm32-adc` instances. This is a common pattern, and it's important to understand how these drivers are structured to properly debug and understand the whole picture. Given this, I need to understand what `stm32-adc-core` is providing the driver in `stm32-adc`. I need to switch my focus and dig into `stm32-adc-core.c` now to see what's going on at the core level. |
| 12/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c",
"FirstLine": 700,
"LineCount": 60
}Results: {
"Contents": " 700:\t\n 701:\t\treturn 0;\n 702:\t}\n 703:\t\n 704:\tstatic int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)\n 705:\t{\n 706:\t\tstruct stm32_adc_priv *priv;\n 707:\t\tstruct device *dev = \u0026pdev-\u003edev;\n 708:\t\tstruct device_node *np = pdev-\u003edev.of_node;\n 709:\t\tstruct resource *res;\n 710:\t\tu32 max_rate;\n 711:\t\tint ret;\n 712:\t\n 713:\t\tif (!pdev-\u003edev.of_node)\n 714:\t\t\treturn -ENODEV;\n 715:\t\n 716:\t\tpriv = devm_kzalloc(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);\n 717:\t\tif (!priv)\n 718:\t\t\treturn -ENOMEM;\n 719:\t\tplatform_set_drvdata(pdev, \u0026priv-\u003ecommon);\n 720:\t\n 721:\t\tpriv-\u003ecfg = device_get_match_data(dev);\n 722:\t\tpriv-\u003enb_adc_max = priv-\u003ecfg-\u003enum_adcs;\n 723:\t\tspin_lock_init(\u0026priv-\u003ecommon.lock);\n 724:\t\n 725:\t\tpriv-\u003ecommon.base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, \u0026res);\n 726:\t\tif (IS_ERR(priv-\u003ecommon.base))\n 727:\t\t\treturn PTR_ERR(priv-\u003ecommon.base);\n 728:\t\tpriv-\u003ecommon.phys_base = res-\u003estart;\n 729:\t\n 730:\t\tpriv-\u003evdda = devm_regulator_get(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, \"vdda\");\n 731:\t\tif (IS_ERR(priv-\u003evdda))\n 732:\t\t\treturn dev_err_probe(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, PTR_ERR(priv-\u003evdda),\n 733:\t\t\t\t\t \"vdda get failed\\n\");\n 734:\t\n 735:\t\tpriv-\u003evref = devm_regulator_get(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, \"vref\");\n 736:\t\tif (IS_ERR(priv-\u003evref))\n 737:\t\t\treturn dev_err_probe(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, PTR_ERR(priv-\u003evref),\n 738:\t\t\t\t\t \"vref get failed\\n\");\n 739:\t\n 740:\t\tpriv-\u003eaclk = devm_clk_get_optional(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, \"adc\");\n 741:\t\tif (IS_ERR(priv-\u003eaclk))\n 742:\t\t\treturn dev_err_probe(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, PTR_ERR(priv-\u003eaclk),\n 743:\t\t\t\t\t \"Can't get 'adc' clock\\n\");\n 744:\t\n 745:\t\tpriv-\u003ebclk = devm_clk_get_optional(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, \"bus\");\n 746:\t\tif (IS_ERR(priv-\u003ebclk))\n 747:\t\t\treturn dev_err_probe(\u0026pdev-\u003edev, PTR_ERR(priv-\u003ebclk),\n 748:\t\t\t\t\t \"Can't get 'bus' clock\\n\");\n 749:\t\n 750:\t\tret = stm32_adc_core_switches_probe(dev, priv);\n 751:\t\tif (ret)\n 752:\t\t\treturn ret;\n 753:\t\n 754:\t\tpm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);\n 755:\t\tpm_runtime_set_active(dev);\n 756:\t\tpm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, STM32_ADC_CORE_SLEEP_DELAY_MS);\n 757:\t\tpm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev);\n 758:\t\tpm_runtime_enable(dev);\n 759:\t\n"
} |
| 13/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.8-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 18463 output: 28 thoughts: 518 Thoughts: **Analyzing the Fuzzing Feasibility of STM32 ADC Code** Okay, so I'm looking at `stm32-adc-core.c` and immediately see a dependency on OpenFirmware (`OF`). Specifically, the code is gated by `ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST` *and* `OF`. It's also expecting Device Tree nodes, regulators like "vdda" and "vref," and the usual hardware resources. The question is, can this even *run* in a fuzzing environment? Can the STM32 ADC be emulated or even present on an amd64 QEMU? Probably not... let's double check what QEMU offers for STM32. Ah, yeah, it has *some* ARM Cortex-M board emulations (like `stm32vldiscovery`, `netduinoplus2`), but they're typically baremetal, not running Linux, and definitely not on an amd64 target. Right, so on amd64 (x86_64), `ARCH_STM32` won't be enabled because it depends on ARM. The only way `STM32_ADC_CORE` and `STM32_ADC` even compile is with `COMPILE_TEST=y`. But even if I *can* compile it, it still needs an OF device tree node, a parent driver, regulators, clocks, memory resources, and interrupts. There's no way to probe all of that on amd64. It's just not going to happen. Now, let's see... "2. WHEN TO RETURN WorthFuzzing=false (NEGATIVE CRITERIA)" – ah, here we go. It's looking for scenarios where the code is effectively unreachable for fuzzing. Okay, that includes "Structurally unreachable hardware" like vendor-specific PCIe stuff, or "exclusive to architectures other than the target architecture." Okay, *could* this STM32 ADC code fall into either of those categories? "Structurally unreachable hardware" – that's a good possibility, given its dependency on an STM32 SOC. "Exclusive to architectures other than the target architecture" - well, `ARCH_STM32` is explicitly ARM. This looks promising. Let me quickly check where `ARCH_STM32` is actually defined, probably in `arch/arm/mach-stm32/`. Yes, I'm pretty sure we have a strong case here. This is probably going to be a "WorthFuzzing=false" scenario. |
| 14/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config ARCH_STM32",
"PathPrefix": "arch/"
}Results: {
"Output": "arch/arm/mach-stm32/Kconfig-1-# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only\narch/arm/mach-stm32/Kconfig:2:menuconfig ARCH_STM32\narch/arm/mach-stm32/Kconfig-3-\tbool \"STMicroelectronics STM32 family\"\n--\narch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms=369=config ARCH_SOPHGO\n--\narch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms-374-\narch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms:375:config ARCH_STM32\narch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms-376-\tbool \"STMicroelectronics STM32 SoC Family\"\n"
} |
| 15/2 | 2026/09/18 09:33 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.8-flash Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 19742 output: 151 thoughts: 1879 Thoughts: **Analysis of Fuzzing Applicability for STM32 ADC Driver** Okay, so `ARCH_STM32` is only defined for ARM and ARM64. On amd64, it's a no-go, completely unavailable. Wait, if `COMPILE_TEST` is set, the code *can* be built. But can it *execute*? The documentation emphasizes that reachability is paramount. Fuzzing is only effective on code that can execute in standard virtualized environments. Can the `stm32-adc` driver execute in environments like GCE or QEMU on amd64? No. It's a SoC-specific peripheral driver designed for STM32 (ARM/ARM64) SoCs. It's a platform driver, reliant on Device Tree (DT) matching using `pdev->dev.of_node`, which is a key indicator. Even if we somehow enable DT on x86 via `OF_UNITTEST`, there's no actual STM32 ADC hardware on x86/amd64. It is a memory-mapped peripheral with specific clocks, regulators, interrupts, and registers. This isn't a virtual device like virtio, USB gadget, loopback, netlink, binder, socket, or dummy; it's *physical* SoC hardware exclusive to STMicroelectronics' STM32 chips. Now, let's look at the patch itself. This is fixing a divide-by-zero bug, specifically if `*val` is zero when processing `vrefint`. The fix implements a crucial check. This occurs within `stm32_adc_read_raw`, which is the `read_raw` callback for the `iio_info` struct for `stm32-adc`. To reach `stm32_adc_read_raw`, a user would interact with the IIO subsystem by reading sysfs attributes like `in_voltage*_raw` or `in_voltage*_input`, created by the IIO subsystem for the registered `indio_dev`. But the `indio_dev` is only registered in `stm32_adc_probe`. `stm32_adc_probe` can only be invoked if a platform device, matching `stm32_adc_of_match`, is present. The driver is instantiated by its parent driver `stm32-adc-core.c`. This matching is done using the Device Tree matching, and `stm32-adc-core.c` creates the platform device. The core gets ioremap resources, regulators, clocks, creates interrupt domains, registers interrupt handlers, and interacts with MMIO registers. All of this is specific to STM32 boards (ARM/ARM64). On amd64 (x86_64), such SoC hardware is absent and cannot be emulated or probed in standard QEMU or GCE VMs. Let's revisit the documentation section on when to *not* fuzz. We're looking for scenarios where the code is unreachable. We're dealing with "Structurally unreachable hardware: Vendor-specific ... drivers ... requiring physical ... SoCs not emulated in standard QEMU" and "Code paths exclusive to architectures other than the target architecture," meaning amd64. STM32 ADC is exclusively ARM/ARM64. Therefore, this code is structurally unreachable on amd64. Based on this analysis: * **WorthFuzzing: false** * **EnableConfigs: \[ ]** * **FocusSymbols: \[ ]** * **Reasoning:** The patch modifies code for an STM32 ADC platform driver, which is a hardware-specific peripheral found only on STMicroelectronics STM32 SoCs. This hardware is not present or emulated in standard virtualized environments (QEMU/GCE) on the amd64 architecture. Although the code can be compiled under COMPILE_TEST, it is structurally unreachable on the amd64 architecture due to this hardware dependency. |
| 16/2 | 2026/09/18 09:34 | tool | set-results |
0mArgs:{
"EnableConfigs": [],
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies error checking and division logic in stm32_adc_read_raw in drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c. This is a platform driver for the internal ADC on STMicroelectronics STM32 SoCs (ARM/ARM64). The driver requires STM32 SoC hardware, parent core devices, and device tree configurations that cannot be emulated or probed in standard virtualized QEMU/GCE test environments on the amd64 target architecture. As the modified code is structurally unreachable hardware code, it does not warrant fuzzing.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Results: {
"EnableConfigs": null,
"FocusSymbols": [],
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies error checking and division logic in stm32_adc_read_raw in drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c. This is a platform driver for the internal ADC on STMicroelectronics STM32 SoCs (ARM/ARM64). The driver requires STM32 SoC hardware, parent core devices, and device tree configurations that cannot be emulated or probed in standard virtualized QEMU/GCE test environments on the amd64 target architecture. As the modified code is structurally unreachable hardware code, it does not warrant fuzzing.",
"WorthFuzzing": false
} |
| 17/1 | 2026/09/18 09:34 | action | If |
0mArgs:{
"WorthFuzzing": false
}Results: null |
| Total Calls | Total Tokens | Avg Tokens | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|
| Total Calls | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|