AI Trajectory

null

{
  "EnableConfigs": [
    "SMC",
    "INFINIBAND",
    "DIBS"
  ],
  "FocusSymbols": [
    "smc_switch_conns"
  ],
  "Reasoning": "The patch fixes a socket reference leak in the error path of `smc_switch_conns` within the SMC network protocol stack. This is a functional change in reachable core networking code and should be fuzzed to ensure the reference counting logic is correct and does not introduce use-after-free or memory leak issues.",
  "WorthFuzzing": true
}

null

{
  "PatchDiff": "commit ad7772c578b3263a39565b557e6697b6c10b0595\nAuthor: syz-cluster \u003ctriage@syzkaller.com\u003e\nDate:   Tue Aug 4 22:10:42 2026 +0000\n\n    syz-cluster: applied patch under review\n\ndiff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c\nindex cf6b620fef05f..04c6ce608ec78 100644\n--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c\n+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c\n@@ -1148,8 +1148,10 @@ struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,\n \t\tread_unlock_bh(\u0026lgr-\u003econns_lock);\n \t\t/* pre-fetch buffer outside of send_lock, might sleep */\n \t\trc = smc_cdc_get_free_slot(conn, to_lnk, \u0026wr_buf, NULL, \u0026pend);\n-\t\tif (rc)\n+\t\tif (rc) {\n+\t\t\tsock_put(\u0026smc-\u003esk);\n \t\t\tgoto err_out;\n+\t\t}\n \t\t/* avoid race with smcr_tx_sndbuf_nonempty() */\n \t\tspin_lock_bh(\u0026conn-\u003esend_lock);\n \t\tsmc_switch_link_and_count(conn, to_lnk);\n"
}

best-expensive

null

{
  "EnableConfigs": [
    "SMC",
    "INFINIBAND",
    "DIBS"
  ],
  "FocusSymbols": [
    "smc_switch_conns"
  ],
  "Reasoning": "The patch fixes a socket reference leak in the error path of `smc_switch_conns` within the SMC network protocol stack. This is a functional change in reachable core networking code and should be fuzzed to ensure the reference counting logic is correct and does not introduce use-after-free or memory leak issues.",
  "WorthFuzzing": true
}

You are an expert Linux kernel maintainer.
Your job is to review a provided patch series and determine
if it makes functional changes to the kernel that should be fuzzed.

IMPORTANT: The changes have ALREADY been applied and committed as the HEAD commit in
your workspace. Do NOT rely on your internal knowledge of the kernel. You must actively
use your code access tools to examine the actual source code and confirm any assumptions.

Return WorthFuzzing=false if the patch only contains:
- Modifications to Documentation/, Kconfig files, or code comments.
- Purely decorative changes, such as logging (e.g., pr_err, printk) or tracepoints.
- Changes to numeric constants or macros that do not functionally alter execution flow.
- Code paths that are impossible to reach in virtualized environments like GCE or QEMU,
  even when utilizing software-emulated hardware (e.g., usb gadget, mac80211_hwsim).
- Code in vendor-specific PCIe switch, SmartNIC, or GPU drivers (e.g., mlxsw, pds_core, qed,
  ionic, amdgpu) that require physical PCIe hardware cards not emulated in standard QEMU.
- Driver .remove, .shutdown, or pci_unregister_driver teardown callbacks (e.g., igb_remove)
  that are executed only during PCI hot-unplug or sysfs driver unbind operations.

If it modifies reachable core kernel logic, drivers, or architectures, use your code search
tools to verify the code can be executed, then return WorthFuzzing=true.

When returning WorthFuzzing=true, you MUST ALSO:
1. Extract any specific kernel functions that should be heavily fuzzed into FocusSymbols.
   Avoid listing generic hot-path functions to prevent skewed test distributions.
   Prefer non-static, non-inlined API entrypoint functions over internal static helper functions
   (which are inlined by the compiler and do not have distinct symbol addresses).
2. Identify any specific CONFIG_ options required to properly test this new/modified feature.
   Go and look into the Kconfig files and check for ifdefs around the code, do not make assumptions.
   Also check "depends on" lines in Kconfig to include any non-standard parent subsystem configs
   needed for Kbuild to compile the code statically into vmlinux. List them in the EnableConfigs
   output array, and DO NOT add a 'CONFIG_' prefix (e.g., return "NET_IPV4" instead of "CONFIG_NET_IPV4").
Prefer calling several tools at the same time to save round-trips.


Use set-results tool to provide results of the analysis.
It must be called exactly once before the final reply.
Ignore results of this tool.

For your convenience, here is the diff of the changes:
commit ad7772c578b3263a39565b557e6697b6c10b0595
Author: syz-cluster <triage@syzkaller.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 4 22:10:42 2026 +0000

    syz-cluster: applied patch under review

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index cf6b620fef05f..04c6ce608ec78 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -1148,8 +1148,10 @@ struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
 		read_unlock_bh(&lgr->conns_lock);
 		/* pre-fetch buffer outside of send_lock, might sleep */
 		rc = smc_cdc_get_free_slot(conn, to_lnk, &wr_buf, NULL, &pend);
-		if (rc)
+		if (rc) {
+			sock_put(&smc->sk);
 			goto err_out;
+		}
 		/* avoid race with smcr_tx_sndbuf_nonempty() */
 		spin_lock_bh(&conn->send_lock);
 		smc_switch_link_and_count(conn, to_lnk);

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 2141
							output: 38
							thoughts: 77
						

Okay, let's break this down.

**Analyzing a Network Connection Bug Fix**

Right, so I'm looking at a patch that's been applied, and it seems like they've added a `sock_put(&smc->sk);` call in the error path of `smc_switch_conns`. My immediate thought is, "Okay, that's interesting. Adding a `sock_put` call suggests a potential reference counting issue or a resource leak scenario in the `smc_switch_conns` function." My experience tells me that such a fix usually indicates a problem where a socket might be left dangling in case of an error.

The fact that it's in the error path means the socket wasn't being properly cleaned up after a failed connection attempt or state transition. A missing `sock_put` would have led to a leaked socket, which, depending on the kernel's garbage collection, could have caused memory leaks, resource exhaustion, or even more subtle, difficult-to-debug issues down the line.

My next move is obvious: I need to take a close look at the `smc_switch_conns` function itself. I need to understand its control flow, specifically the error paths, to see *why* this call was necessary. I need to see if the patch is a complete solution, or just a band-aid. Was the socket *intentionally* held on to elsewhere and then missed? Or was there a complex set of error conditions that wasn't properly handled originally? I'll probably be scrutinizing any other functions that call `smc_switch_conns` as well, to see if there's a potential cascading effect from the fix.

{
  "Expression": "smc_switch_conns",
  "PathPrefix": "net/smc/smc_core.c"
}

{
  "Output": "net/smc/smc_core.c=1083=void smc_switch_link_and_count(struct smc_connection *conn,\n--\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1094-\nnet/smc/smc_core.c:1095:struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1096-\t\t\t\t  struct smc_link *from_lnk, bool is_dev_err)\n--\nnet/smc/smc_core.c=1788=static void smcr_link_down(struct smc_link *lnk)\n--\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1796-\nnet/smc/smc_core.c:1797:\tto_lnk = smc_switch_conns(lgr, lnk, true);\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1798-\tif (!to_lnk) { /* no backup link available */\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 2895
							output: 29
							thoughts: 34
						

Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as my own:

**Analyzing the SMC Connection Transition**

Right, so `smc_switch_conns` is triggered from `smcr_link_down`. That's the key trigger point. My immediate thought is, "What's the *actual* configuration state of the SMC interface at that moment?" I need to understand what's required for SMC to switch appropriately. I need to figure out the right configuration details to move through. I'll need to double check the settings. Let me go back and look.

{
  "Expression": "config SMC",
  "PathPrefix": "net/smc/Kconfig"
}

{
  "Output": "net/smc/Kconfig-1-# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only\nnet/smc/Kconfig:2:config SMC\nnet/smc/Kconfig-3-\ttristate \"SMC socket protocol family\"\n--\nnet/smc/Kconfig-13-\nnet/smc/Kconfig:14:config SMC_DIAG\nnet/smc/Kconfig-15-\ttristate \"SMC: socket monitoring interface\"\n--\nnet/smc/Kconfig-22-\nnet/smc/Kconfig:23:config SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF\nnet/smc/Kconfig-24-\tbool \"Generic eBPF hook for SMC handshake flow\"\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 3268
							output: 32
							thoughts: 140
						

**Fuzzing Target Identification**

Okay, so the configuration is set for `SMC`, which is a socket protocol family. My initial thought is to identify a promising fuzzing target within this context. The code seems to indicate that `smc_switch_conns` is reachable, and that it is called from `smcr_link_down`. Further exploration shows that `smcr_link_down` is itself called from `smc_link_down_work` and `smc_core_going_away`. Given this call chain, and since SMC is a socket protocol, this is definitely a good starting point and it warrants deeper investigation.

Therefore, the obvious focus for now is `smc_switch_conns`. I should now examine its implementation in `net/smc/smc_core.c` to identify any other potentially interesting functions or data structures that might be exposed during its execution. This deeper look is key to expanding the fuzzing surface area.

{
  "Expression": "smc_switch_conns",
  "PathPrefix": "net/smc/"
}

{
  "Output": "net/smc/smc_core.c=1083=void smc_switch_link_and_count(struct smc_connection *conn,\n--\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1094-\nnet/smc/smc_core.c:1095:struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1096-\t\t\t\t  struct smc_link *from_lnk, bool is_dev_err)\n--\nnet/smc/smc_core.c=1788=static void smcr_link_down(struct smc_link *lnk)\n--\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1796-\nnet/smc/smc_core.c:1797:\tto_lnk = smc_switch_conns(lgr, lnk, true);\nnet/smc/smc_core.c-1798-\tif (!to_lnk) { /* no backup link available */\n--\nnet/smc/smc_core.h=615=int smcr_link_reg_buf(struct smc_link *link, struct smc_buf_desc *rmb_desc);\nnet/smc/smc_core.h:616:struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,\nnet/smc/smc_core.h-617-\t\t\t\t  struct smc_link *from_lnk, bool is_dev_err);\n--\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c=1288=static void smc_llc_delete_asym_link(struct smc_link_group *lgr)\n--\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c-1298-\t\treturn;\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c:1299:\tlnk_new = smc_switch_conns(lgr, lnk_asym, false);\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c-1300-\tsmc_wr_tx_wait_no_pending_sends(lnk_asym);\n--\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c=1594=static void smc_llc_process_cli_delete_link(struct smc_link_group *lgr)\n--\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c-1630-\tif (smc_link_downing(\u0026lnk_del-\u003estate))\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c:1631:\t\tsmc_switch_conns(lgr, lnk_del, false);\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c-1632-\tsmcr_link_clear(lnk_del, true);\n--\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c=1672=static void smc_llc_process_srv_delete_link(struct smc_link_group *lgr)\n--\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c-1703-\tif (smc_link_downing(\u0026lnk_del-\u003estate)) {\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c:1704:\t\tif (smc_switch_conns(lgr, lnk_del, false))\nnet/smc/smc_llc.c-1705-\t\t\tsmc_wr_tx_wait_no_pending_sends(lnk_del);\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 4532
							output: 34
							thoughts: 96
						

**Analyzing the Impact of a Recent Patch**

Okay, so I've been looking over this patch. It addresses a missing `sock_put` call within `smc_switch_conns`. Now, `smc_switch_conns` isn't static, which means it's accessible from other parts of the kernel, so I'm certain it's being reached. This looks like a straightforward functional change, a bug fix really. Definitely something we need to get right.

Given its nature, and the potential impact if mishandled, this is a definite candidate for fuzzing. I'll need to focus my fuzzing efforts specifically on `smc_switch_conns`. Makes sense.

The relevant config I see here is `SMC`, so I'll be sure to enable that. But, as I always do, I should double check that there aren't any other related configurations that I need to be aware of or enable to properly test this patch. I want to be thorough.

{
  "File": "net/smc/Kconfig",
  "FirstLine": 1,
  "LineCount": 100
}

{
  "Contents": "   1:\t# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only\n   2:\tconfig SMC\n   3:\t\ttristate \"SMC socket protocol family\"\n   4:\t\tdepends on INET \u0026\u0026 INFINIBAND \u0026\u0026 DIBS\n   5:\t\thelp\n   6:\t\t  SMC-R provides a \"sockets over RDMA\" solution making use of\n   7:\t\t  RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) technology to upgrade\n   8:\t\t  AF_INET TCP connections transparently.\n   9:\t\t  The Linux implementation of the SMC-R solution is designed as\n  10:\t\t  a separate socket family SMC.\n  11:\t\n  12:\t\t  Select this option if you want to run SMC socket applications\n  13:\t\n  14:\tconfig SMC_DIAG\n  15:\t\ttristate \"SMC: socket monitoring interface\"\n  16:\t\tdepends on SMC\n  17:\t\thelp\n  18:\t\t  Support for SMC socket monitoring interface used by tools such as\n  19:\t\t  smcss.\n  20:\t\n  21:\t\t  if unsure, say Y.\n  22:\t\n  23:\tconfig SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF\n  24:\t\tbool \"Generic eBPF hook for SMC handshake flow\"\n  25:\t\tdepends on SMC \u0026\u0026 BPF_JIT \u0026\u0026 BPF_SYSCALL\n  26:\t\tdefault y\n  27:\t\thelp\n  28:\t\t  SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF enables support to register generic eBPF hook for SMC\n  29:\t\t  handshake flow, which offer much greater flexibility in modifying the behavior\n  30:\t\t  of the SMC protocol stack compared to a complete kernel-based approach. Select\n  31:\t\t  this option if you want filtring the handshake process via eBPF programs.\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 5326
							output: 33
							thoughts: 292
						

**Debugging SMC Dependencies**

Okay, so I'm digging into this `SMC` module, and the dependency chain is throwing me for a loop. It *should* depend on `INET && INFINIBAND`, that's what I'd expect. But hold on... did I just see `DIBS` in there? That doesn't seem right. `DIBS` isn't a recognized component in this context, right? Let me double-check the output.

Wait, the output *does* say `depends on INET && INFINIBAND && DIBS`. Okay, maybe I misread it initially. No, I swear it *shouldn't* depend on `DIBS`. Okay, back to the output. Let me make absolutely sure. Yes, it still seems to say `INET && INFINIBAND && DIBS`. This makes no sense, it shouldn't be there. Let's look again, very carefully. Nope. Wait, let me try re-reading it, maybe my eyes are deceiving me. Still the same. Okay, let me try running `read-file` again. Okay, yes! It says `depends on INET && INFINIBAND && DIBS`. Alright, I'm missing something here. This still feels like a mistake. Okay, let's re-read it again. No, wait, wait, wait. Let's try one more time. No, the output still says `depends on INET && INFINIBAND && DIBS`. This isn't right. I'm going to go straight to `net/smc/Kconfig` to figure out what's actually going on.

{
  "File": "net/smc/Kconfig",
  "FirstLine": 1,
  "LineCount": 20
}

{
  "Contents": "   1:\t# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only\n   2:\tconfig SMC\n   3:\t\ttristate \"SMC socket protocol family\"\n   4:\t\tdepends on INET \u0026\u0026 INFINIBAND \u0026\u0026 DIBS\n   5:\t\thelp\n   6:\t\t  SMC-R provides a \"sockets over RDMA\" solution making use of\n   7:\t\t  RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) technology to upgrade\n   8:\t\t  AF_INET TCP connections transparently.\n   9:\t\t  The Linux implementation of the SMC-R solution is designed as\n  10:\t\t  a separate socket family SMC.\n  11:\t\n  12:\t\t  Select this option if you want to run SMC socket applications\n  13:\t\n  14:\tconfig SMC_DIAG\n  15:\t\ttristate \"SMC: socket monitoring interface\"\n  16:\t\tdepends on SMC\n  17:\t\thelp\n  18:\t\t  Support for SMC socket monitoring interface used by tools such as\n  19:\t\t  smcss.\n  20:\t\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 6271
							output: 23
							thoughts: 24
						

Here's my attempt at summarizing the thought process, tailored for an expert audience:

**Investigating a Configuration Parameter**

Okay, hold on a second. `DIBS`... that's a new one. I don't recall seeing that parameter before. Is this some internal config, a newer standard, or possibly a typo? Time to quickly verify its validity. Need to check if `DIBS` is actually defined anywhere in the relevant codebase or documentation. A quick search should turn up something, one way or another. Otherwise, it will require a deeper dive to figure out what is going on.

{
  "Expression": "config DIBS",
  "PathPrefix": ""
}

{
  "Output": "drivers/dibs/Kconfig-1-# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0\ndrivers/dibs/Kconfig:2:config DIBS\ndrivers/dibs/Kconfig-3-\ttristate \"Direct Internal Buffer Sharing support\"\n--\ndrivers/dibs/Kconfig-13-\ndrivers/dibs/Kconfig:14:config DIBS_LO\ndrivers/dibs/Kconfig-15-\tbool \"Intra-OS shortcut with dibs loopback\"\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 6571
							output: 33
							thoughts: 417
						

**My Analysis of this Configuration and Patch**

Okay, so `DIBS` is confirmed as a legitimate configuration option within this tree. That's good to know. It looks like `SMC` has dependencies on `INET`, `INFINIBAND`, and `DIBS`. Initially, my thought was to enable all four, `SMC`, `INET`, `INFINIBAND`, and `DIBS`, to ensure complete coverage. However, `INET` is generally enabled by default, so I'll prioritize including `SMC`, `INFINIBAND`, and `DIBS` for this specific fuzzing configuration.

Now, let's examine the patch itself. It seems the only function modified is `smc_switch_conns` within `net/smc/smc_core.c`. Looking at the diff, it appears to be a functional change. It adds a `sock_put` call in the error path. This strongly suggests a fix for a reference leak. That's definitely worth fuzzing; a potential memory management issue is always interesting.

The patch appears to be focused on a reference counting problem that can be reached by a race condition. Thus, I want to focus the fuzzing on `smc_switch_conns`.

Given this, the most effective configuration for this fuzzing run is: enabling `SMC`, `INFINIBAND`, and `DIBS`. It is wise to double check if `DIBS` has further dependencies, although I don't see any obvious ones at this time.

{
  "File": "drivers/dibs/Kconfig",
  "FirstLine": 1,
  "LineCount": 20
}

{
  "Contents": "   1:\t# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0\n   2:\tconfig DIBS\n   3:\t\ttristate \"Direct Internal Buffer Sharing support\"\n   4:\t\tdefault n\n   5:\t\thelp\n   6:\t\t  Direct Internal Buffer Sharing (DIBS) is a communication method that\n   7:\t\t  uses common physical (internal) memory for synchronous direct access\n   8:\t\t  into a remote buffer.\n   9:\t\n  10:\t\t  Select this option to provide the abstraction layer between\n  11:\t\t  dibs devices and dibs clients like the SMC protocol.\n  12:\t\t  The module name is dibs.\n  13:\t\n  14:\tconfig DIBS_LO\n  15:\t\tbool \"Intra-OS shortcut with dibs loopback\"\n  16:\t\tdepends on DIBS\n  17:\t\tdefault n\n  18:\t\thelp\n  19:\t\t  DIBS_LO enables the creation of an software-emulated dibs device\n  20:\t\t  named lo which can be used for transferring data when communication\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 7612
							output: 35
							thoughts: 32
						

Okay, here's my interpretation of those thoughts, summarized from my perspective as someone well-versed in this area:

**Dependency Deep Dive**

Alright, let's see... `DIBS`. No dependencies, that's straightforward. Now, `INFINIBAND`... Hmm, *potential* dependencies. I need to make sure I'm not overlooking anything critical here. Let's dig into the relevant Kconfig file – `drivers/infiniband/Kconfig`. I need to understand what's required for `INFINIBAND` to function. I'll need to look at the other configuration options related to it, and how it interacts with the rest of the kernel. What modules, features, or underlying drivers are pulled in as a result? Let's check the options themselves and their dependencies...

{
  "File": "drivers/infiniband/Kconfig",
  "FirstLine": 1,
  "LineCount": 20
}

{
  "Contents": "   1:\t# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only\n   2:\tmenuconfig INFINIBAND\n   3:\t\ttristate \"InfiniBand support\"\n   4:\t\tdepends on HAS_IOMEM \u0026\u0026 HAS_DMA\n   5:\t\tdepends on NET\n   6:\t\tdepends on INET\n   7:\t\tdepends on !ALPHA\n   8:\t\tselect DMA_SHARED_BUFFER\n   9:\t\tselect IRQ_POLL\n  10:\t\tselect DIMLIB\n  11:\t\thelp\n  12:\t\t  Core support for InfiniBand (IB).  Make sure to also select\n  13:\t\t  any protocols you wish to use as well as drivers for your\n  14:\t\t  InfiniBand hardware.\n  15:\t\n  16:\tif INFINIBAND\n  17:\t\n  18:\tconfig INFINIBAND_USER_MAD\n  19:\t\ttristate \"InfiniBand userspace MAD support\"\n  20:\t\tdepends on INFINIBAND\n"
}

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

null

null

							input: 8104
							output: 121
							thoughts: 149
						

**My Configuration Decisions**

Okay, let's break this down. My understanding is that setting up this fix hinges on a few key configurations. I know `INFINIBAND` requires `HAS_IOMEM`, `HAS_DMA`, `NET`, `INET`, but *not* the `ALPHA` architecture, so that's standard. The real focus seems to be on enabling a specific combination: `SMC`, `INFINIBAND`, and `DIBS`. The logic is clear; this patch addresses a reference leak within the error handling of `smc_switch_conns` within the SMC protocol stack. We are dealing with a functional correction in a networking protocol that is in use, which is critical.

Now, let me quickly double-check that this is the complete set. `SMC` is the core, and then `INFINIBAND` and `DIBS` are simply dependencies of `SMC`. With this confirmation, I'm confident in setting these configurations now.

{
  "EnableConfigs": [
    "SMC",
    "INFINIBAND",
    "DIBS"
  ],
  "FocusSymbols": [
    "smc_switch_conns"
  ],
  "Reasoning": "The patch fixes a socket reference leak in the error path of `smc_switch_conns` within the SMC network protocol stack. This is a functional change in reachable core networking code and should be fuzzed to ensure the reference counting logic is correct and does not introduce use-after-free or memory leak issues.",
  "WorthFuzzing": true
}

{
  "EnableConfigs": [
    "SMC",
    "INFINIBAND",
    "DIBS"
  ],
  "FocusSymbols": [
    "smc_switch_conns"
  ],
  "Reasoning": "The patch fixes a socket reference leak in the error path of `smc_switch_conns` within the SMC network protocol stack. This is a functional change in reachable core networking code and should be fuzzed to ensure the reference counting logic is correct and does not introduce use-after-free or memory leak issues.",
  "WorthFuzzing": true
}