| Seq | Timestamp | Type | Name | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/0 | 2026/08/01 22:05 | flow | patch-triage |
13mArgs:null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": [
"IP_VS",
"IP_VS_PROTO_TCP",
"IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP",
"IP_VS_DH",
"IP_VS_LBLC",
"IP_VS_LBLCR",
"IP_VS_LC"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"ip_vs_dest_update_overload",
"ip_vs_conn_new",
"ip_vs_try_bind_dest",
"ip_vs_check_template",
"ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush",
"ip_vs_nat_xmit",
"ip_vs_tunnel_xmit",
"ip_vs_dr_xmit",
"ip_vs_icmp_xmit"
],
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies IPVS destination server connection tracking and overload flag updates. It introduces `totalconns` to replace `inactconns` and adds `cflags` for config flags, moving `IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE` to `IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE`. It also adds `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` to update the overload flag based on thresholds. These are functional changes to the IPVS core logic and schedulers. Fuzzing should focus on connection binding/unbinding, destination updates, and packet transmission paths that check the availability and overload status of destinations.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
} |
| 1/1 | 2026/08/01 22:05 | action | read-patch-diff |
0mArgs:null Results: {
"PatchDiff": "commit bc84f54a453028ade83a1eaf8944724c13612ed7\nAuthor: syz-cluster \u003ctriage@syzkaller.com\u003e\nDate: Sat Aug 1 22:05:56 2026 +0000\n\n syz-cluster: applied patch under review\n\ndiff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h\nindex e6ca930a3507b..02db0767efff2 100644\n--- a/include/net/ip_vs.h\n+++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h\n@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@\n #define IP_VS_HDR_INVERSE\t1\n #define IP_VS_HDR_ICMP\t\t2\n \n+/* Destination Server Flags */\n+#define IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD\t0x0002\t\t/* server is overloaded */\n+\n+/* Destination Server Config Flags */\n+#define IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE\t0x0001\t\t/* server is available */\n+\n /* conn_tab limits (as per Kconfig) */\n #define IP_VS_CONN_TAB_MIN_BITS\t8\n #if BITS_PER_LONG \u003e 32\n@@ -978,6 +984,7 @@ struct ip_vs_dest {\n \tvolatile unsigned int\tflags;\t\t/* dest status flags */\n \tatomic_t\t\tconn_flags;\t/* flags to copy to conn */\n \tatomic_t\t\tweight;\t\t/* server weight */\n+\tunsigned long\t\tcflags;\t\t/* config flags */\n \tatomic_t\t\tlast_weight;\t/* server latest weight */\n \t__u16\t\t\ttun_type;\t/* tunnel type */\n \t__be16\t\t\ttun_port;\t/* tunnel port */\n@@ -989,10 +996,11 @@ struct ip_vs_dest {\n \n \t/* connection counters and thresholds */\n \tatomic_t\t\tactiveconns;\t/* active connections */\n-\tatomic_t\t\tinactconns;\t/* inactive connections */\n+\tatomic_t\t\ttotalconns;\t/* total connections */\n \tatomic_t\t\tpersistconns;\t/* persistent connections */\n \t__u32\t\t\tu_threshold;\t/* upper threshold */\n \t__u32\t\t\tl_threshold;\t/* lower threshold */\n+\t__u32\t\t\tl_threshold_val;/* used lower threshold */\n \n \t/* for destination cache */\n \tspinlock_t\t\tdst_lock;\t/* lock of dst_cache */\n@@ -1909,6 +1917,8 @@ static inline void ip_vs_dest_put_and_free(struct ip_vs_dest *dest)\n \t\tkfree(dest);\n }\n \n+void ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode);\n+\n /* IPVS sync daemon data and function prototypes\n * (from ip_vs_sync.c)\n */\n@@ -2229,14 +2239,21 @@ void ip_vs_unregister_hooks(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, unsigned int af);\n static inline int\n ip_vs_dest_conn_overhead(struct ip_vs_dest *dest)\n {\n-\t/* We think the overhead of processing active connections is 256\n+\t/* We think the overhead of processing active connections is 257\n \t * times higher than that of inactive connections in average. (This\n-\t * 256 times might not be accurate, we will change it later) We\n+\t * 257 times might not be accurate, we will change it later) We\n \t * use the following formula to estimate the overhead now:\n-\t *\t\t dest-\u003eactiveconns*256 + dest-\u003einactconns\n+\t *\t\t dest-\u003eactiveconns*256 + dest-\u003etotalconns\n \t */\n \treturn (atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns) \u003c\u003c 8) +\n-\t\tatomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n+\t\tatomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003etotalconns);\n+}\n+\n+static inline int\n+ip_vs_dest_inactconns(const struct ip_vs_dest *dest)\n+{\n+\treturn max(atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003etotalconns) -\n+\t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns), 0);\n }\n \n #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_TCP\ndiff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h b/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h\nindex 1ed234e7f2513..2c37c6ac7525a 100644\n--- a/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h\n+++ b/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h\n@@ -28,12 +28,6 @@\n #define IP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED_SH_FALLBACK\tIP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED1 /* SH fallback */\n #define IP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED_SH_PORT\tIP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED2 /* SH use port */\n \n-/*\n- * Destination Server Flags\n- */\n-#define IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE\t0x0001\t\t/* server is available */\n-#define IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD\t0x0002\t\t/* server is overloaded */\n-\n /*\n * IPVS sync daemon states\n */\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c\nindex 36c5cba03f5bc..6fa3e1dc534c3 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c\n@@ -1081,12 +1081,6 @@ static inline void ip_vs_bind_xmit_v6(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)\n #endif\n \n \n-static inline int ip_vs_dest_totalconns(struct ip_vs_dest *dest)\n-{\n-\treturn atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns)\n-\t\t+ atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n-}\n-\n /*\n *\tBind a connection entry with a virtual service destination\n *\tCalled just after a new connection entry is created.\n@@ -1147,23 +1141,22 @@ ip_vs_bind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_dest *dest)\n \n \t/* Update the connection counters */\n \tif (!(flags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE)) {\n+\t\tint tc;\n+\n \t\t/* It is a normal connection, so modify the counters\n \t\t * according to the flags, later the protocol can\n \t\t * update them on state change\n \t\t */\n \t\tif (!(flags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE))\n \t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\telse\n-\t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n+\t\ttc = atomic_inc_return(\u0026dest-\u003etotalconns);\n+\t\tif (tc == READ_ONCE(dest-\u003eu_threshold))\n+\t\t\tip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, 1);\n \t} else {\n \t\t/* It is a persistent connection/template, so increase\n \t\t the persistent connection counter */\n \t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003epersistconns);\n \t}\n-\n-\tif (dest-\u003eu_threshold != 0 \u0026\u0026\n-\t ip_vs_dest_totalconns(dest) \u003e= dest-\u003eu_threshold)\n-\t\tdest-\u003eflags |= IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;\n }\n \n \n@@ -1244,30 +1237,20 @@ static inline void ip_vs_unbind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)\n \n \t/* Update the connection counters */\n \tif (!(cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE)) {\n-\t\t/* It is a normal connection, so decrease the inactconns\n-\t\t or activeconns counter */\n-\t\tif (cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) {\n-\t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n-\t\t} else {\n+\t\tint tc;\n+\n+\t\t/* It is a normal connection, so decrease the counters */\n+\t\tif (!(cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE))\n \t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t}\n+\t\ttc = atomic_fetch_dec(\u0026dest-\u003etotalconns);\n+\t\tif (tc == READ_ONCE(dest-\u003el_threshold_val))\n+\t\t\tip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, -1);\n \t} else {\n \t\t/* It is a persistent connection/template, so decrease\n \t\t the persistent connection counter */\n \t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003epersistconns);\n \t}\n \n-\tif (dest-\u003el_threshold != 0) {\n-\t\tif (ip_vs_dest_totalconns(dest) \u003c dest-\u003el_threshold)\n-\t\t\tdest-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;\n-\t} else if (dest-\u003eu_threshold != 0) {\n-\t\tif (ip_vs_dest_totalconns(dest) * 4 \u003c dest-\u003eu_threshold * 3)\n-\t\t\tdest-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;\n-\t} else {\n-\t\tif (dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD)\n-\t\t\tdest-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;\n-\t}\n-\n \tip_vs_dest_put(dest);\n }\n \n@@ -1296,7 +1279,7 @@ int ip_vs_check_template(struct ip_vs_conn *ct, struct ip_vs_dest *cdest)\n \t * Checking the dest server status.\n \t */\n \tif ((dest == NULL) ||\n-\t !(dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE) ||\n+\t !(dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE) ||\n \t expire_quiescent_template(ipvs, dest) ||\n \t (cdest \u0026\u0026 (dest != cdest))) {\n \t\tIP_VS_DBG_BUF(9, \"check_template: dest not available for \"\n@@ -2037,7 +2020,7 @@ void ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)\n \t\t\tcp = ip_vs_hn0_to_conn(hn);\n \t\t\tresched_score++;\n \t\t\tdest = cp-\u003edest;\n-\t\t\tif (!dest || (dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE))\n+\t\t\tif (!dest || (dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE))\n \t\t\t\tcontinue;\n \n \t\t\tif (atomic_read(\u0026cp-\u003en_control))\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c\nindex 6b79e0c4d9e28..1a922648c917d 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c\n@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ ip_vs_in_stats(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct sk_buff *skb)\n \tstruct ip_vs_dest *dest = cp-\u003edest;\n \tstruct netns_ipvs *ipvs = cp-\u003eipvs;\n \n-\tif (dest \u0026\u0026 (dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {\n+\tif (dest \u0026\u0026 (dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {\n \t\tstruct ip_vs_cpu_stats *s;\n \t\tstruct ip_vs_service *svc;\n \n@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ ip_vs_out_stats(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct sk_buff *skb)\n \tstruct ip_vs_dest *dest = cp-\u003edest;\n \tstruct netns_ipvs *ipvs = cp-\u003eipvs;\n \n-\tif (dest \u0026\u0026 (dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {\n+\tif (dest \u0026\u0026 (dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {\n \t\tstruct ip_vs_cpu_stats *s;\n \t\tstruct ip_vs_service *svc;\n \n@@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ ip_vs_in_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state\n \t}\n \n \t/* Check the server status */\n-\tif (cp \u0026\u0026 cp-\u003edest \u0026\u0026 !(cp-\u003edest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {\n+\tif (cp \u0026\u0026 cp-\u003edest \u0026\u0026 !(cp-\u003edest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {\n \t\t/* the destination server is not available */\n \t\tif (sysctl_expire_nodest_conn(ipvs)) {\n \t\t\tbool old_ct = ip_vs_conn_uses_old_conntrack(cp, skb);\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c\nindex bcf40b8c41cf2..8f9a8e491ad6b 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c\n@@ -1304,6 +1304,40 @@ void ip_vs_stats_free(struct ip_vs_stats *stats)\n \t}\n }\n \n+/* Update overload flag based on number of dest conns and lower/upper\n+ * connection thresholds:\n+ * - conns reach u_threshold and exceed it: set the flag\n+ * - conns go below l_threshold (or 75% of u_threshold): clear the flag\n+ */\n+static void __ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode)\n+{\n+\tint conns;\n+\tu32 l, u;\n+\n+\tlockdep_assert_held(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n+\tu = READ_ONCE(dest-\u003eu_threshold);\n+\tif (!u)\n+\t\tgoto unset;\n+\tl = READ_ONCE(dest-\u003el_threshold_val);\n+\tconns = atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003etotalconns);\n+\tif (conns \u003e= (mode \u003e 0 ? l : u)) {\n+\t\tdest-\u003eflags |= IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;\n+\t\treturn;\n+\t}\n+\tif (conns \u003e= (mode \u003c 0 ? u : l))\n+\t\treturn;\n+\n+unset:\n+\tdest-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;\n+}\n+\n+void ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode)\n+{\n+\tspin_lock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n+\t__ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, mode);\n+\tspin_unlock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n+}\n+\n /*\n *\tUpdate a destination in the given service\n */\n@@ -1368,12 +1402,21 @@ __ip_vs_update_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest *dest,\n \t}\n \n \t/* set the dest status flags */\n-\tdest-\u003eflags |= IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE;\n+\tdest-\u003ecflags |= IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE;\n \n-\tif (udest-\u003eu_threshold == 0 || udest-\u003eu_threshold \u003e dest-\u003eu_threshold)\n-\t\tdest-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;\n-\tdest-\u003eu_threshold = udest-\u003eu_threshold;\n-\tdest-\u003el_threshold = udest-\u003el_threshold;\n+\tif (READ_ONCE(dest-\u003eu_threshold) != udest-\u003eu_threshold ||\n+\t READ_ONCE(dest-\u003el_threshold) != udest-\u003el_threshold) {\n+\t\tspin_lock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n+\t\tWRITE_ONCE(dest-\u003eu_threshold, udest-\u003eu_threshold);\n+\t\tWRITE_ONCE(dest-\u003el_threshold, udest-\u003el_threshold);\n+\t\t/* Low threshold defaults to 75% of upper threshold */\n+\t\tWRITE_ONCE(dest-\u003el_threshold_val,\n+\t\t\t udest-\u003el_threshold ? :\n+\t\t\t (udest-\u003eu_threshold -\n+\t\t\t (udest-\u003eu_threshold \u003e\u003e 2)));\n+\t\t__ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, 0);\n+\t\tspin_unlock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n+\t}\n \n \tdest-\u003eaf = udest-\u003eaf;\n \n@@ -1445,7 +1488,7 @@ ip_vs_new_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\n \tdest-\u003eport = udest-\u003eport;\n \n \tatomic_set(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns, 0);\n-\tatomic_set(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns, 0);\n+\tatomic_set(\u0026dest-\u003etotalconns, 0);\n \tatomic_set(\u0026dest-\u003epersistconns, 0);\n \trefcount_set(\u0026dest-\u003erefcnt, 1);\n \n@@ -1486,6 +1529,9 @@ ip_vs_add_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\n \t\treturn -ERANGE;\n \t}\n \n+\tif (udest-\u003eu_threshold \u003e INT_MAX)\n+\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n+\n \tif (udest-\u003etun_type == IP_VS_CONN_F_TUNNEL_TYPE_GUE) {\n \t\tif (udest-\u003etun_port == 0) {\n \t\t\tpr_err(\"%s(): tunnel port is zero\\n\", __func__);\n@@ -1559,6 +1605,9 @@ ip_vs_edit_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\n \t\treturn -ERANGE;\n \t}\n \n+\tif (udest-\u003eu_threshold \u003e INT_MAX)\n+\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n+\n \tif (udest-\u003etun_type == IP_VS_CONN_F_TUNNEL_TYPE_GUE) {\n \t\tif (udest-\u003etun_port == 0) {\n \t\t\tpr_err(\"%s(): tunnel port is zero\\n\", __func__);\n@@ -1613,7 +1662,7 @@ static void __ip_vs_unlink_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc,\n \t\t\t\tstruct ip_vs_dest *dest,\n \t\t\t\tint svcupd)\n {\n-\tdest-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE;\n+\tdest-\u003ecflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE;\n \n \tspin_lock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n \t__ip_vs_dst_cache_reset(dest);\n@@ -3031,7 +3080,7 @@ static int ip_vs_info_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)\n \t\t\t\t\t ip_vs_fwd_name(atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003econn_flags)),\n \t\t\t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eweight),\n \t\t\t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns),\n-\t\t\t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns));\n+\t\t\t\t\t ip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest));\n \t\t\telse\n #endif\n \t\t\t\tseq_printf(seq,\n@@ -3042,7 +3091,7 @@ static int ip_vs_info_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)\n \t\t\t\t\t ip_vs_fwd_name(atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003econn_flags)),\n \t\t\t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eweight),\n \t\t\t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns),\n-\t\t\t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns));\n+\t\t\t\t\t ip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest));\n \n \t\t}\n \t}\n@@ -3667,10 +3716,10 @@ __ip_vs_get_dest_entries(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, const struct ip_vs_get_dests *\n \t\t\tentry.port = dest-\u003eport;\n \t\t\tentry.conn_flags = atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003econn_flags);\n \t\t\tentry.weight = atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eweight);\n-\t\t\tentry.u_threshold = dest-\u003eu_threshold;\n-\t\t\tentry.l_threshold = dest-\u003el_threshold;\n+\t\t\tentry.u_threshold = READ_ONCE(dest-\u003eu_threshold);\n+\t\t\tentry.l_threshold = READ_ONCE(dest-\u003el_threshold);\n \t\t\tentry.activeconns = atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t\tentry.inactconns = atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n+\t\t\tentry.inactconns = ip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest);\n \t\t\tentry.persistconns = atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003epersistconns);\n \t\t\tip_vs_copy_stats(\u0026kstats, \u0026dest-\u003estats);\n \t\t\tip_vs_export_stats_user(\u0026entry.stats, \u0026kstats);\n@@ -4277,12 +4326,14 @@ static int ip_vs_genl_fill_dest(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_dest *dest)\n \t\t\t dest-\u003etun_port) ||\n \t nla_put_u16(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_TUN_FLAGS,\n \t\t\tdest-\u003etun_flags) ||\n-\t nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_U_THRESH, dest-\u003eu_threshold) ||\n-\t nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_L_THRESH, dest-\u003el_threshold) ||\n+\t nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_U_THRESH,\n+\t\t\tREAD_ONCE(dest-\u003eu_threshold)) ||\n+\t nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_L_THRESH,\n+\t\t\tREAD_ONCE(dest-\u003el_threshold)) ||\n \t nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_ACTIVE_CONNS,\n \t\t\tatomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns)) ||\n \t nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_INACT_CONNS,\n-\t\t\tatomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns)) ||\n+\t\t\tip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest)) ||\n \t nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_PERSIST_CONNS,\n \t\t\tatomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003epersistconns)) ||\n \t nla_put_u16(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_ADDR_FAMILY, dest-\u003eaf))\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c\nindex e1f62f6b25e21..43abed7a26a6a 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c\n@@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ ip_vs_dh_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,\n \n \ts = (struct ip_vs_dh_state *) svc-\u003esched_data;\n \tdest = ip_vs_dh_get(svc-\u003eaf, s, \u0026iph-\u003edaddr);\n-\tif (!dest\n-\t || !(dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)\n+\tif (!dest ||\n+\t !(dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)\n \t || atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eweight) \u003c= 0\n \t || is_overloaded(dest)) {\n \t\tip_vs_scheduler_err(svc, \"no destination available\");\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c\nindex 15ccb2b2fa1f4..693bcc82ccb77 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c\n@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ ip_vs_lblc_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,\n \t\t */\n \n \t\tdest = en-\u003edest;\n-\t\tif ((dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE) \u0026\u0026\n+\t\tif ((dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE) \u0026\u0026\n \t\t atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eweight) \u003e 0 \u0026\u0026 !is_overloaded(dest, svc))\n \t\t\tgoto out;\n \t}\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c\nindex c90ea897c3f75..f53f05ceea36f 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c\n@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ static inline struct ip_vs_dest *ip_vs_dest_set_min(struct ip_vs_dest_set *set)\n \t\tif (least-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD)\n \t\t\tcontinue;\n \n-\t\tif ((atomic_read(\u0026least-\u003eweight) \u003e 0)\n-\t\t \u0026\u0026 (least-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {\n+\t\tif ((atomic_read(\u0026least-\u003eweight) \u003e 0) \u0026\u0026\n+\t\t (least-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {\n \t\t\tloh = ip_vs_dest_conn_overhead(least);\n \t\t\tgoto nextstage;\n \t\t}\n@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ static inline struct ip_vs_dest *ip_vs_dest_set_min(struct ip_vs_dest_set *set)\n \n \t\tdoh = ip_vs_dest_conn_overhead(dest);\n \t\tif (((__s64)loh * atomic_read(\u0026dest-\u003eweight) \u003e\n-\t\t (__s64)doh * atomic_read(\u0026least-\u003eweight))\n-\t\t \u0026\u0026 (dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {\n+\t\t (__s64)doh * atomic_read(\u0026least-\u003eweight)) \u0026\u0026\n+\t\t (dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {\n \t\t\tleast = dest;\n \t\t\tloh = doh;\n \t\t}\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c\nindex 38cc38c5d8bbd..18b976a7c4d20 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c\n@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ ip_vs_lc_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,\n \n \t/*\n \t * Simply select the server with the least number of\n-\t * (activeconns\u003c\u003c5) + inactconns\n+\t * (activeconns*256) + totalconns\n \t * Except whose weight is equal to zero.\n \t * If the weight is equal to zero, it means that the server is\n \t * quiesced, the existing connections to the server still get\n@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ ip_vs_lc_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,\n \t\t\t IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(least-\u003eaf, \u0026least-\u003eaddr),\n \t\t\t ntohs(least-\u003eport),\n \t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026least-\u003eactiveconns),\n-\t\t\t atomic_read(\u0026least-\u003einactconns));\n+\t\t\t ip_vs_dest_inactconns(least));\n \n \treturn least;\n }\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c\nindex 3dbd3096e1637..9db1273e5ba42 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c\n@@ -446,12 +446,10 @@ set_sctp_state(struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n \t\t\tif (!(cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) \u0026\u0026\n \t\t\t\t(next_state != IP_VS_SCTP_S_ESTABLISHED)) {\n \t\t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n \t\t\t\tcp-\u003eflags |= IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;\n \t\t\t} else if ((cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) \u0026\u0026\n \t\t\t\t (next_state == IP_VS_SCTP_S_ESTABLISHED)) {\n \t\t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n \t\t\t\tcp-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;\n \t\t\t}\n \t\t}\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c\nindex 99a286fdc90c6..fec0e8b47b716 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c\n@@ -526,12 +526,10 @@ set_tcp_state(struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n \t\t\tif (!(cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) \u0026\u0026\n \t\t\t !tcp_state_active(new_state)) {\n \t\t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n \t\t\t\tcp-\u003eflags |= IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;\n \t\t\t} else if ((cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) \u0026\u0026\n \t\t\t\t tcp_state_active(new_state)) {\n \t\t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n \t\t\t\tcp-\u003eflags \u0026= ~IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;\n \t\t\t}\n \t\t}\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c\nindex 93038abbf5e04..ea5fdd4f4ce76 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c\n@@ -878,13 +878,10 @@ static void ip_vs_proc_conn(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct ip_vs_conn_param *pa\n \t\tspin_lock_bh(\u0026cp-\u003elock);\n \t\tif ((cp-\u003eflags ^ flags) \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE \u0026\u0026\n \t\t !(flags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE) \u0026\u0026 dest) {\n-\t\t\tif (flags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) {\n+\t\t\tif (flags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE)\n \t\t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n-\t\t\t} else {\n+\t\t\telse\n \t\t\t\tatomic_inc(\u0026dest-\u003eactiveconns);\n-\t\t\t\tatomic_dec(\u0026dest-\u003einactconns);\n-\t\t\t}\n \t\t}\n \t\tflags \u0026= IP_VS_CONN_F_BACKUP_UPD_MASK;\n \t\tflags |= cp-\u003eflags \u0026 ~IP_VS_CONN_F_BACKUP_UPD_MASK;\ndiff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c\nindex 0b0c5304993a9..1b36fed8abe29 100644\n--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c\n+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c\n@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ __ip_vs_get_out_rt(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int skb_af, struct sk_buff *skb,\n \t\t\t * stored in dest_trash.\n \t\t\t */\n \t\t\tif (!rt_dev_is_down(dst_dev_rcu(\u0026rt-\u003edst)) \u0026\u0026\n-\t\t\t dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)\n+\t\t\t dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)\n \t\t\t\t__ip_vs_dst_set(dest, dest_dst, \u0026rt-\u003edst, 0);\n \t\t\telse\n \t\t\t\tnoref = 0;\n@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ __ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int skb_af, struct sk_buff *skb,\n \t\t\t * stored in dest_trash.\n \t\t\t */\n \t\t\tif (!rt_dev_is_down(dst_dev_rcu(\u0026rt-\u003edst)) \u0026\u0026\n-\t\t\t dest-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)\n+\t\t\t dest-\u003ecflags \u0026 IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)\n \t\t\t\t__ip_vs_dst_set(dest, dest_dst, \u0026rt-\u003edst, cookie);\n \t\t\telse\n \t\t\t\tnoref = 0;\n"
} |
| 2/1 | 2026/08/01 22:05 | agent | patch-evaluator |
13mModel:best-expensive Args: null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": [
"IP_VS",
"IP_VS_PROTO_TCP",
"IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP",
"IP_VS_DH",
"IP_VS_LBLC",
"IP_VS_LBLCR",
"IP_VS_LC"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"ip_vs_dest_update_overload",
"ip_vs_conn_new",
"ip_vs_try_bind_dest",
"ip_vs_check_template",
"ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush",
"ip_vs_nat_xmit",
"ip_vs_tunnel_xmit",
"ip_vs_dr_xmit",
"ip_vs_icmp_xmit"
],
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies IPVS destination server connection tracking and overload flag updates. It introduces `totalconns` to replace `inactconns` and adds `cflags` for config flags, moving `IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE` to `IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE`. It also adds `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` to update the overload flag based on thresholds. These are functional changes to the IPVS core logic and schedulers. Fuzzing should focus on connection binding/unbinding, destination updates, and packet transmission paths that check the availability and overload status of destinations.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
}Instruction: You are an expert Linux kernel maintainer. Your job is to review a provided patch series and determine if it makes functional changes to the kernel that should be fuzzed. IMPORTANT: The changes have ALREADY been applied and committed as the HEAD commit in your workspace. Do NOT rely on your internal knowledge of the kernel. You must actively use your code access tools to examine the actual source code and confirm any assumptions. Return WorthFuzzing=false if the patch only contains: - Modifications to Documentation/, Kconfig files, or code comments. - Purely decorative changes, such as logging (e.g., pr_err, printk) or tracepoints. - Changes to numeric constants or macros that do not functionally alter execution flow. - Code paths that are impossible to reach in virtualized environments like GCE or QEMU, even when utilizing software-emulated hardware (e.g., usb gadget, mac80211_hwsim). - Code in vendor-specific PCIe switch, SmartNIC, or GPU drivers (e.g., mlxsw, pds_core, qed, ionic, amdgpu) that require physical PCIe hardware cards not emulated in standard QEMU. - Driver .remove, .shutdown, or pci_unregister_driver teardown callbacks (e.g., igb_remove) that are executed only during PCI hot-unplug or sysfs driver unbind operations. If it modifies reachable core kernel logic, drivers, or architectures, use your code search tools to verify the code can be executed, then return WorthFuzzing=true. When returning WorthFuzzing=true, you MUST ALSO: 1. Extract any specific kernel functions that should be heavily fuzzed into FocusSymbols. Avoid listing generic hot-path functions to prevent skewed test distributions. Prefer non-static, non-inlined API entrypoint functions over internal static helper functions (which are inlined by the compiler and do not have distinct symbol addresses). 2. Identify any specific CONFIG_ options required to properly test this new/modified feature. Go and look into the Kconfig files and check for ifdefs around the code, do not make assumptions. Also check "depends on" lines in Kconfig to include any non-standard parent subsystem configs needed for Kbuild to compile the code statically into vmlinux. List them in the EnableConfigs output array, and DO NOT add a 'CONFIG_' prefix (e.g., return "NET_IPV4" instead of "CONFIG_NET_IPV4"). Prefer calling several tools at the same time to save round-trips. Use set-results tool to provide results of the analysis. It must be called exactly once before the final reply. Ignore results of this tool. Prompt: For your convenience, here is the diff of the changes:
commit bc84f54a453028ade83a1eaf8944724c13612ed7
Author: syz-cluster <triage@syzkaller.com>
Date: Sat Aug 1 22:05:56 2026 +0000
syz-cluster: applied patch under review
diff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h
index e6ca930a3507b..02db0767efff2 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_vs.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h
@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@
#define IP_VS_HDR_INVERSE 1
#define IP_VS_HDR_ICMP 2
+/* Destination Server Flags */
+#define IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD 0x0002 /* server is overloaded */
+
+/* Destination Server Config Flags */
+#define IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE 0x0001 /* server is available */
+
/* conn_tab limits (as per Kconfig) */
#define IP_VS_CONN_TAB_MIN_BITS 8
#if BITS_PER_LONG > 32
@@ -978,6 +984,7 @@ struct ip_vs_dest {
volatile unsigned int flags; /* dest status flags */
atomic_t conn_flags; /* flags to copy to conn */
atomic_t weight; /* server weight */
+ unsigned long cflags; /* config flags */
atomic_t last_weight; /* server latest weight */
__u16 tun_type; /* tunnel type */
__be16 tun_port; /* tunnel port */
@@ -989,10 +996,11 @@ struct ip_vs_dest {
/* connection counters and thresholds */
atomic_t activeconns; /* active connections */
- atomic_t inactconns; /* inactive connections */
+ atomic_t totalconns; /* total connections */
atomic_t persistconns; /* persistent connections */
__u32 u_threshold; /* upper threshold */
__u32 l_threshold; /* lower threshold */
+ __u32 l_threshold_val;/* used lower threshold */
/* for destination cache */
spinlock_t dst_lock; /* lock of dst_cache */
@@ -1909,6 +1917,8 @@ static inline void ip_vs_dest_put_and_free(struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
kfree(dest);
}
+void ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode);
+
/* IPVS sync daemon data and function prototypes
* (from ip_vs_sync.c)
*/
@@ -2229,14 +2239,21 @@ void ip_vs_unregister_hooks(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, unsigned int af);
static inline int
ip_vs_dest_conn_overhead(struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
{
- /* We think the overhead of processing active connections is 256
+ /* We think the overhead of processing active connections is 257
* times higher than that of inactive connections in average. (This
- * 256 times might not be accurate, we will change it later) We
+ * 257 times might not be accurate, we will change it later) We
* use the following formula to estimate the overhead now:
- * dest->activeconns*256 + dest->inactconns
+ * dest->activeconns*256 + dest->totalconns
*/
return (atomic_read(&dest->activeconns) << 8) +
- atomic_read(&dest->inactconns);
+ atomic_read(&dest->totalconns);
+}
+
+static inline int
+ip_vs_dest_inactconns(const struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
+{
+ return max(atomic_read(&dest->totalconns) -
+ atomic_read(&dest->activeconns), 0);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_TCP
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h b/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h
index 1ed234e7f2513..2c37c6ac7525a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/ip_vs.h
@@ -28,12 +28,6 @@
#define IP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED_SH_FALLBACK IP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED1 /* SH fallback */
#define IP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED_SH_PORT IP_VS_SVC_F_SCHED2 /* SH use port */
-/*
- * Destination Server Flags
- */
-#define IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE 0x0001 /* server is available */
-#define IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD 0x0002 /* server is overloaded */
-
/*
* IPVS sync daemon states
*/
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
index 36c5cba03f5bc..6fa3e1dc534c3 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
@@ -1081,12 +1081,6 @@ static inline void ip_vs_bind_xmit_v6(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
#endif
-static inline int ip_vs_dest_totalconns(struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
-{
- return atomic_read(&dest->activeconns)
- + atomic_read(&dest->inactconns);
-}
-
/*
* Bind a connection entry with a virtual service destination
* Called just after a new connection entry is created.
@@ -1147,23 +1141,22 @@ ip_vs_bind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
/* Update the connection counters */
if (!(flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE)) {
+ int tc;
+
/* It is a normal connection, so modify the counters
* according to the flags, later the protocol can
* update them on state change
*/
if (!(flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE))
atomic_inc(&dest->activeconns);
- else
- atomic_inc(&dest->inactconns);
+ tc = atomic_inc_return(&dest->totalconns);
+ if (tc == READ_ONCE(dest->u_threshold))
+ ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, 1);
} else {
/* It is a persistent connection/template, so increase
the persistent connection counter */
atomic_inc(&dest->persistconns);
}
-
- if (dest->u_threshold != 0 &&
- ip_vs_dest_totalconns(dest) >= dest->u_threshold)
- dest->flags |= IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;
}
@@ -1244,30 +1237,20 @@ static inline void ip_vs_unbind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
/* Update the connection counters */
if (!(cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE)) {
- /* It is a normal connection, so decrease the inactconns
- or activeconns counter */
- if (cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) {
- atomic_dec(&dest->inactconns);
- } else {
+ int tc;
+
+ /* It is a normal connection, so decrease the counters */
+ if (!(cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE))
atomic_dec(&dest->activeconns);
- }
+ tc = atomic_fetch_dec(&dest->totalconns);
+ if (tc == READ_ONCE(dest->l_threshold_val))
+ ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, -1);
} else {
/* It is a persistent connection/template, so decrease
the persistent connection counter */
atomic_dec(&dest->persistconns);
}
- if (dest->l_threshold != 0) {
- if (ip_vs_dest_totalconns(dest) < dest->l_threshold)
- dest->flags &= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;
- } else if (dest->u_threshold != 0) {
- if (ip_vs_dest_totalconns(dest) * 4 < dest->u_threshold * 3)
- dest->flags &= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;
- } else {
- if (dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD)
- dest->flags &= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;
- }
-
ip_vs_dest_put(dest);
}
@@ -1296,7 +1279,7 @@ int ip_vs_check_template(struct ip_vs_conn *ct, struct ip_vs_dest *cdest)
* Checking the dest server status.
*/
if ((dest == NULL) ||
- !(dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE) ||
+ !(dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE) ||
expire_quiescent_template(ipvs, dest) ||
(cdest && (dest != cdest))) {
IP_VS_DBG_BUF(9, "check_template: dest not available for "
@@ -2037,7 +2020,7 @@ void ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
cp = ip_vs_hn0_to_conn(hn);
resched_score++;
dest = cp->dest;
- if (!dest || (dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE))
+ if (!dest || (dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE))
continue;
if (atomic_read(&cp->n_control))
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
index 6b79e0c4d9e28..1a922648c917d 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ ip_vs_in_stats(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct ip_vs_dest *dest = cp->dest;
struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = cp->ipvs;
- if (dest && (dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {
+ if (dest && (dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {
struct ip_vs_cpu_stats *s;
struct ip_vs_service *svc;
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ ip_vs_out_stats(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct ip_vs_dest *dest = cp->dest;
struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = cp->ipvs;
- if (dest && (dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {
+ if (dest && (dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {
struct ip_vs_cpu_stats *s;
struct ip_vs_service *svc;
@@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ ip_vs_in_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state
}
/* Check the server status */
- if (cp && cp->dest && !(cp->dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {
+ if (cp && cp->dest && !(cp->dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {
/* the destination server is not available */
if (sysctl_expire_nodest_conn(ipvs)) {
bool old_ct = ip_vs_conn_uses_old_conntrack(cp, skb);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
index bcf40b8c41cf2..8f9a8e491ad6b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
@@ -1304,6 +1304,40 @@ void ip_vs_stats_free(struct ip_vs_stats *stats)
}
}
+/* Update overload flag based on number of dest conns and lower/upper
+ * connection thresholds:
+ * - conns reach u_threshold and exceed it: set the flag
+ * - conns go below l_threshold (or 75% of u_threshold): clear the flag
+ */
+static void __ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode)
+{
+ int conns;
+ u32 l, u;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&dest->dst_lock);
+ u = READ_ONCE(dest->u_threshold);
+ if (!u)
+ goto unset;
+ l = READ_ONCE(dest->l_threshold_val);
+ conns = atomic_read(&dest->totalconns);
+ if (conns >= (mode > 0 ? l : u)) {
+ dest->flags |= IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;
+ return;
+ }
+ if (conns >= (mode < 0 ? u : l))
+ return;
+
+unset:
+ dest->flags &= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;
+}
+
+void ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode)
+{
+ spin_lock_bh(&dest->dst_lock);
+ __ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, mode);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&dest->dst_lock);
+}
+
/*
* Update a destination in the given service
*/
@@ -1368,12 +1402,21 @@ __ip_vs_update_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest *dest,
}
/* set the dest status flags */
- dest->flags |= IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE;
+ dest->cflags |= IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE;
- if (udest->u_threshold == 0 || udest->u_threshold > dest->u_threshold)
- dest->flags &= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD;
- dest->u_threshold = udest->u_threshold;
- dest->l_threshold = udest->l_threshold;
+ if (READ_ONCE(dest->u_threshold) != udest->u_threshold ||
+ READ_ONCE(dest->l_threshold) != udest->l_threshold) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&dest->dst_lock);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dest->u_threshold, udest->u_threshold);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dest->l_threshold, udest->l_threshold);
+ /* Low threshold defaults to 75% of upper threshold */
+ WRITE_ONCE(dest->l_threshold_val,
+ udest->l_threshold ? :
+ (udest->u_threshold -
+ (udest->u_threshold >> 2)));
+ __ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, 0);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&dest->dst_lock);
+ }
dest->af = udest->af;
@@ -1445,7 +1488,7 @@ ip_vs_new_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)
dest->port = udest->port;
atomic_set(&dest->activeconns, 0);
- atomic_set(&dest->inactconns, 0);
+ atomic_set(&dest->totalconns, 0);
atomic_set(&dest->persistconns, 0);
refcount_set(&dest->refcnt, 1);
@@ -1486,6 +1529,9 @@ ip_vs_add_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)
return -ERANGE;
}
+ if (udest->u_threshold > INT_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (udest->tun_type == IP_VS_CONN_F_TUNNEL_TYPE_GUE) {
if (udest->tun_port == 0) {
pr_err("%s(): tunnel port is zero\n", __func__);
@@ -1559,6 +1605,9 @@ ip_vs_edit_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)
return -ERANGE;
}
+ if (udest->u_threshold > INT_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (udest->tun_type == IP_VS_CONN_F_TUNNEL_TYPE_GUE) {
if (udest->tun_port == 0) {
pr_err("%s(): tunnel port is zero\n", __func__);
@@ -1613,7 +1662,7 @@ static void __ip_vs_unlink_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc,
struct ip_vs_dest *dest,
int svcupd)
{
- dest->flags &= ~IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE;
+ dest->cflags &= ~IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE;
spin_lock_bh(&dest->dst_lock);
__ip_vs_dst_cache_reset(dest);
@@ -3031,7 +3080,7 @@ static int ip_vs_info_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
ip_vs_fwd_name(atomic_read(&dest->conn_flags)),
atomic_read(&dest->weight),
atomic_read(&dest->activeconns),
- atomic_read(&dest->inactconns));
+ ip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest));
else
#endif
seq_printf(seq,
@@ -3042,7 +3091,7 @@ static int ip_vs_info_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
ip_vs_fwd_name(atomic_read(&dest->conn_flags)),
atomic_read(&dest->weight),
atomic_read(&dest->activeconns),
- atomic_read(&dest->inactconns));
+ ip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest));
}
}
@@ -3667,10 +3716,10 @@ __ip_vs_get_dest_entries(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, const struct ip_vs_get_dests *
entry.port = dest->port;
entry.conn_flags = atomic_read(&dest->conn_flags);
entry.weight = atomic_read(&dest->weight);
- entry.u_threshold = dest->u_threshold;
- entry.l_threshold = dest->l_threshold;
+ entry.u_threshold = READ_ONCE(dest->u_threshold);
+ entry.l_threshold = READ_ONCE(dest->l_threshold);
entry.activeconns = atomic_read(&dest->activeconns);
- entry.inactconns = atomic_read(&dest->inactconns);
+ entry.inactconns = ip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest);
entry.persistconns = atomic_read(&dest->persistconns);
ip_vs_copy_stats(&kstats, &dest->stats);
ip_vs_export_stats_user(&entry.stats, &kstats);
@@ -4277,12 +4326,14 @@ static int ip_vs_genl_fill_dest(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
dest->tun_port) ||
nla_put_u16(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_TUN_FLAGS,
dest->tun_flags) ||
- nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_U_THRESH, dest->u_threshold) ||
- nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_L_THRESH, dest->l_threshold) ||
+ nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_U_THRESH,
+ READ_ONCE(dest->u_threshold)) ||
+ nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_L_THRESH,
+ READ_ONCE(dest->l_threshold)) ||
nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_ACTIVE_CONNS,
atomic_read(&dest->activeconns)) ||
nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_INACT_CONNS,
- atomic_read(&dest->inactconns)) ||
+ ip_vs_dest_inactconns(dest)) ||
nla_put_u32(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_PERSIST_CONNS,
atomic_read(&dest->persistconns)) ||
nla_put_u16(skb, IPVS_DEST_ATTR_ADDR_FAMILY, dest->af))
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c
index e1f62f6b25e21..43abed7a26a6a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c
@@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ ip_vs_dh_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,
s = (struct ip_vs_dh_state *) svc->sched_data;
dest = ip_vs_dh_get(svc->af, s, &iph->daddr);
- if (!dest
- || !(dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)
+ if (!dest ||
+ !(dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)
|| atomic_read(&dest->weight) <= 0
|| is_overloaded(dest)) {
ip_vs_scheduler_err(svc, "no destination available");
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c
index 15ccb2b2fa1f4..693bcc82ccb77 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ ip_vs_lblc_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,
*/
dest = en->dest;
- if ((dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE) &&
+ if ((dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE) &&
atomic_read(&dest->weight) > 0 && !is_overloaded(dest, svc))
goto out;
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c
index c90ea897c3f75..f53f05ceea36f 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.c
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ static inline struct ip_vs_dest *ip_vs_dest_set_min(struct ip_vs_dest_set *set)
if (least->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD)
continue;
- if ((atomic_read(&least->weight) > 0)
- && (least->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {
+ if ((atomic_read(&least->weight) > 0) &&
+ (least->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {
loh = ip_vs_dest_conn_overhead(least);
goto nextstage;
}
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ static inline struct ip_vs_dest *ip_vs_dest_set_min(struct ip_vs_dest_set *set)
doh = ip_vs_dest_conn_overhead(dest);
if (((__s64)loh * atomic_read(&dest->weight) >
- (__s64)doh * atomic_read(&least->weight))
- && (dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)) {
+ (__s64)doh * atomic_read(&least->weight)) &&
+ (dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)) {
least = dest;
loh = doh;
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c
index 38cc38c5d8bbd..18b976a7c4d20 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lc.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ ip_vs_lc_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,
/*
* Simply select the server with the least number of
- * (activeconns<<5) + inactconns
+ * (activeconns*256) + totalconns
* Except whose weight is equal to zero.
* If the weight is equal to zero, it means that the server is
* quiesced, the existing connections to the server still get
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ ip_vs_lc_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,
IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(least->af, &least->addr),
ntohs(least->port),
atomic_read(&least->activeconns),
- atomic_read(&least->inactconns));
+ ip_vs_dest_inactconns(least));
return least;
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
index 3dbd3096e1637..9db1273e5ba42 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
@@ -446,12 +446,10 @@ set_sctp_state(struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
if (!(cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) &&
(next_state != IP_VS_SCTP_S_ESTABLISHED)) {
atomic_dec(&dest->activeconns);
- atomic_inc(&dest->inactconns);
cp->flags |= IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;
} else if ((cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) &&
(next_state == IP_VS_SCTP_S_ESTABLISHED)) {
atomic_inc(&dest->activeconns);
- atomic_dec(&dest->inactconns);
cp->flags &= ~IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;
}
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c
index 99a286fdc90c6..fec0e8b47b716 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c
@@ -526,12 +526,10 @@ set_tcp_state(struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,
if (!(cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) &&
!tcp_state_active(new_state)) {
atomic_dec(&dest->activeconns);
- atomic_inc(&dest->inactconns);
cp->flags |= IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;
} else if ((cp->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) &&
tcp_state_active(new_state)) {
atomic_inc(&dest->activeconns);
- atomic_dec(&dest->inactconns);
cp->flags &= ~IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE;
}
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
index 93038abbf5e04..ea5fdd4f4ce76 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
@@ -878,13 +878,10 @@ static void ip_vs_proc_conn(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct ip_vs_conn_param *pa
spin_lock_bh(&cp->lock);
if ((cp->flags ^ flags) & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE &&
!(flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE) && dest) {
- if (flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE) {
+ if (flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_INACTIVE)
atomic_dec(&dest->activeconns);
- atomic_inc(&dest->inactconns);
- } else {
+ else
atomic_inc(&dest->activeconns);
- atomic_dec(&dest->inactconns);
- }
}
flags &= IP_VS_CONN_F_BACKUP_UPD_MASK;
flags |= cp->flags & ~IP_VS_CONN_F_BACKUP_UPD_MASK;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
index 0b0c5304993a9..1b36fed8abe29 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ __ip_vs_get_out_rt(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int skb_af, struct sk_buff *skb,
* stored in dest_trash.
*/
if (!rt_dev_is_down(dst_dev_rcu(&rt->dst)) &&
- dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)
+ dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)
__ip_vs_dst_set(dest, dest_dst, &rt->dst, 0);
else
noref = 0;
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ __ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int skb_af, struct sk_buff *skb,
* stored in dest_trash.
*/
if (!rt_dev_is_down(dst_dev_rcu(&rt->dst)) &&
- dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE)
+ dest->cflags & IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE)
__ip_vs_dst_set(dest, dest_dst, &rt->dst, cookie);
else
noref = 0;
|
| 3/2 | 2026/08/01 22:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 10512 output: 34 thoughts: 336 Thoughts: **Analyzing This IPVS Patch** Okay, so I'm looking at this patch that's tweaking IPVS within the netfilter realm. It seems like a pretty significant functional change, as it modifies how destination server connections are tracked, specifically moving from `inactconns` to `totalconns` within the `struct ip_vs_dest`. They're also adding `cflags` for config flags and shifting `IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE` over to `IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE` within those `cflags`. The introduction of `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` to handle overload flag updates based on `totalconns` and thresholds is interesting. I need to understand the implications of this approach. First things first: is this thing even reachable and fuzzable? Yeah, IPVS is core networking, so we're definitely looking at potential attack surface here, likely accessible via netlink sockets or `setsockopt`. The patch touches quite a few files: `ip_vs_conn.c`, `ip_vs_core.c`, `ip_vs_ctl.c`, and so on. That broad touch suggests a fundamental shift, which is something I need to keep in mind. Now, I need to understand the configuration landscape here. `CONFIG_IP_VS` is obviously the main switch. But I need to go deeper; I should really go back and check the Kconfig files for IPVS to make sure there are no gotchas there. |
| 4/2 | 2026/08/01 22:06 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config IP_VS",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-4-#\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:5:menuconfig IP_VS\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-6-\ttristate \"IP virtual server support\"\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=286=comment 'IPVS SH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-287-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:288:config IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-289-\tint \"IPVS source hashing table size (the Nth power of 2)\"\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=301=comment 'IPVS MH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-302-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:303:config IP_VS_MH_TAB_INDEX\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-304-\tint \"IPVS maglev hashing table index of size (the prime numbers)\"\n"
} |
| 5/2 | 2026/08/01 22:06 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 11472 output: 32 thoughts: 23 Thoughts: Here's a summary of my thought process: **Diving into IPVS Configuration** Okay, I need to understand the dependencies for the IPVS configuration options. A good starting point is always the `Kconfig` file. Let's navigate to `net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig` and see what's defined there. That should shed some light on the pre-requisites for enabling IPVS and give me a clear picture of its integration within the kernel's build system. This will help me immensely when troubleshooting or configuring a system. I know this is the way to find the conditional build options. |
| 6/2 | 2026/08/01 22:06 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "depends on",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=5=menuconfig IP_VS\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-6-\ttristate \"IP virtual server support\"\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:7:\tdepends on INET \u0026\u0026 NETFILTER\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:8:\tdepends on (NF_CONNTRACK || NF_CONNTRACK=n)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-9-\thelp\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=29=config\tIP_VS_IPV6\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-30-\tbool \"IPv6 support for IPVS\"\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:31:\tdepends on IPV6 = y || IP_VS = IPV6\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-32-\tselect NF_DEFRAG_IPV6\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=321=config\tIP_VS_FTP\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-322-\ttristate \"FTP protocol helper\"\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:323:\tdepends on IP_VS_PROTO_TCP \u0026\u0026 NF_CONNTRACK \u0026\u0026 NF_NAT \u0026\u0026 \\\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-324-\t\tNF_CONNTRACK_FTP\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=337=config\tIP_VS_NFCT\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-338-\tbool \"Netfilter connection tracking\"\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:339:\tdepends on NF_CONNTRACK\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-340-\thelp\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=345=config\tIP_VS_PE_SIP\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-346-\ttristate \"SIP persistence engine\"\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:347:\tdepends on IP_VS_PROTO_UDP\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:348:\tdepends on NF_CONNTRACK_SIP\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-349-\thelp\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=352=config GCOV_PROFILE_IPVS\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-353-\tbool \"Enable GCOV profiling for IPVS\"\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:354:\tdepends on GCOV_KERNEL\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-355-\thelp\n"
} |
| 7/2 | 2026/08/01 22:06 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 12306 output: 35 thoughts: 93 Thoughts: Okay, here's my breakdown of what I'm looking at: **Investigating the IPVS Dependencies and Potential Configuration Needs** Alright, so I see this patch is making changes to `IP_VS`, and my initial thought is, "Okay, this almost certainly relies on `INET` and `NETFILTER` – no surprise there." I'll need to double-check that those are correctly configured as prerequisites. The patch itself is touching several files within the IPVS framework: `ip_vs_dh.c`, `ip_vs_lblc.c`, `ip_vs_lblcr.c`, `ip_vs_lc.c`, `ip_vs_proto_sctp.c`, and `ip_vs_proto_tcp.c`. These are all core components, so this likely indicates some significant changes potentially in how the different load balancing methods and protocols work within IPVS. My next step is to carefully review these specific files, because I'm betting that the changes here may have specific configuration implications or new tuning parameters. I need to figure out which configurations are required or if there are any that are now deprecated or altered. I need to be sure that these configs haven't changed the default behaviors of the system. |
| 8/2 | 2026/08/01 22:06 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config IP_VS_",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=286=comment 'IPVS SH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-287-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:288:config IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-289-\tint \"IPVS source hashing table size (the Nth power of 2)\"\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=301=comment 'IPVS MH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-302-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:303:config IP_VS_MH_TAB_INDEX\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-304-\tint \"IPVS maglev hashing table index of size (the prime numbers)\"\n"
} |
| 9/2 | 2026/08/01 22:06 | llm | patch-evaluator |
5mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 12909 output: 35 thoughts: 30 Thoughts: Okay, here's my interpretation of that thought process, tailored for an expert audience: **Kernel Configuration Hunting: IPVS** Right, let me see... I need to refresh my memory on the IPVS configuration options. Instead of blindly poking around, a more efficient approach is to directly target the relevant Kconfig file. That means I should really use `grep` – that's the fastest way to get a quick overview. I'll search for `config IP_VS` within the `net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig` file. That should pull up all the related config options in one shot. Saves me the trouble of manually navigating the Kconfig structure. Good starting point. |
| 10/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "^config IP_VS",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=286=comment 'IPVS SH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-287-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:288:config IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-289-\tint \"IPVS source hashing table size (the Nth power of 2)\"\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=301=comment 'IPVS MH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-302-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:303:config IP_VS_MH_TAB_INDEX\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-304-\tint \"IPVS maglev hashing table index of size (the prime numbers)\"\n"
} |
| 11/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 13331 output: 35 thoughts: 13 Thoughts: Here's my attempt at summarizing the thought process, tailored for an expert audience: **Kernel Configuration Pondering** Okay, so I'm staring at this and immediately my brain flags it. *`config IP_VS_` with a space...* That space is a red flag. I know the kernel build system pretty well, and that kind of syntax deviation almost always indicates a potential issue, either in the Kconfig itself, the build process, or perhaps even a typo that's now manifesting as a problem. It’s certainly not standard. I need to figure out what's really happening and get to the root of the error. Is it a malformed symbol name? Is there an unexpected whitespace character inserted? Perhaps a stray character slipped into a conditional clause? I'm going to have to dive into the relevant Kconfig files and the associated makefiles to understand the intent and trace where this is being interpreted incorrectly. Gotta get to the bottom of this peculiarity. |
| 12/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "^config IP_VS",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=286=comment 'IPVS SH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-287-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:288:config IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-289-\tint \"IPVS source hashing table size (the Nth power of 2)\"\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=301=comment 'IPVS MH scheduler'\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-302-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:303:config IP_VS_MH_TAB_INDEX\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-304-\tint \"IPVS maglev hashing table index of size (the prime numbers)\"\n"
} |
| 13/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 13793 output: 37 thoughts: 8 Thoughts: Okay, here's my interpretation of that thought process, tailored for an expert audience, and written in the first person: **Initial Assessment: A Direct Approach** Alright, the objective is pretty clear. No need to overthink this. My immediate thought is, "Let's just read the file." I'm cutting through any preliminary assumptions or strategic considerations. It's a simple, direct, and often the most efficient starting point. We're not engaging in complex modeling or risk assessments at this stage; rather, we need to establish a base level understanding. The file itself is the primary source of information, and the most expedient method is to simply begin processing its contents. We'll start at the most elementary level, and begin processing the data to lay the foundations for deeper analysis. |
| 14/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig",
"FirstLine": 1,
"LineCount": 100
}Results: {
"Contents": " 1:\t# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only\n 2:\t#\n 3:\t# IP Virtual Server configuration\n 4:\t#\n 5:\tmenuconfig IP_VS\n 6:\t\ttristate \"IP virtual server support\"\n 7:\t\tdepends on INET \u0026\u0026 NETFILTER\n 8:\t\tdepends on (NF_CONNTRACK || NF_CONNTRACK=n)\n 9:\t\thelp\n 10:\t\t IP Virtual Server support will let you build a high-performance\n 11:\t\t virtual server based on cluster of two or more real servers. This\n 12:\t\t option must be enabled for at least one of the clustered computers\n 13:\t\t that will take care of intercepting incoming connections to a\n 14:\t\t single IP address and scheduling them to real servers.\n 15:\t\n 16:\t\t Three request dispatching techniques are implemented, they are\n 17:\t\t virtual server via NAT, virtual server via tunneling and virtual\n 18:\t\t server via direct routing. The several scheduling algorithms can\n 19:\t\t be used to choose which server the connection is directed to,\n 20:\t\t thus load balancing can be achieved among the servers. For more\n 21:\t\t information and its administration program, please visit the\n 22:\t\t following URL: \u003chttp://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/\u003e.\n 23:\t\n 24:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 25:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 26:\t\n 27:\tif IP_VS\n 28:\t\n 29:\tconfig\tIP_VS_IPV6\n 30:\t\tbool \"IPv6 support for IPVS\"\n 31:\t\tdepends on IPV6 = y || IP_VS = IPV6\n 32:\t\tselect NF_DEFRAG_IPV6\n 33:\t\thelp\n 34:\t\t Add IPv6 support to IPVS.\n 35:\t\n 36:\t\t Say Y if unsure.\n 37:\t\n 38:\tconfig\tIP_VS_DEBUG\n 39:\t\tbool \"IP virtual server debugging\"\n 40:\t\thelp\n 41:\t\t Say Y here if you want to get additional messages useful in\n 42:\t\t debugging the IP virtual server code. You can change the debug\n 43:\t\t level in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/debug_level\n 44:\t\n 45:\tconfig\tIP_VS_TAB_BITS\n 46:\t\tint \"IPVS connection table size (the Nth power of 2)\"\n 47:\t\trange 8 20 if !64BIT\n 48:\t\trange 8 27 if 64BIT\n 49:\t\tdefault 12\n 50:\t\thelp\n 51:\t\t The IPVS connection hash table uses the chaining scheme to handle\n 52:\t\t hash collisions. Using a big IPVS connection hash table will greatly\n 53:\t\t reduce conflicts when there are hundreds of thousands of connections\n 54:\t\t in the hash table.\n 55:\t\n 56:\t\t Note the table size must be power of 2. The table size will be the\n 57:\t\t value of 2 to the your input number power. The number to choose is\n 58:\t\t from 8 to 27 for 64BIT(20 otherwise), the default number is 12,\n 59:\t\t which means the table size is 4096. Don't input the number too\n 60:\t\t small, otherwise you will lose performance on it. You can adapt the\n 61:\t\t table size yourself, according to your virtual server application.\n 62:\t\t It is good to set the table size not far less than the number of\n 63:\t\t connections per second multiplying average lasting time of\n 64:\t\t connection in the table. For example, your virtual server gets 200\n 65:\t\t connections per second, the connection lasts for 200 seconds in\n 66:\t\t average in the connection table, the table size should be not far\n 67:\t\t less than 200x200, it is good to set the table size 32768 (2**15).\n 68:\t\n 69:\t\t Another note that each connection occupies 128 bytes effectively and\n 70:\t\t each hash entry uses 8 bytes, so you can estimate how much memory is\n 71:\t\t needed for your box.\n 72:\t\n 73:\t\t You can overwrite this number setting conn_tab_bits module parameter\n 74:\t\t or by appending ip_vs.conn_tab_bits=? to the kernel command line if\n 75:\t\t IP VS was compiled built-in.\n 76:\t\n 77:\tcomment \"IPVS transport protocol load balancing support\"\n 78:\t\n 79:\tconfig\tIP_VS_PROTO_TCP\n 80:\t\tbool \"TCP load balancing support\"\n 81:\t\thelp\n 82:\t\t This option enables support for load balancing TCP transport\n 83:\t\t protocol. Say Y if unsure.\n 84:\t\n 85:\tconfig\tIP_VS_PROTO_UDP\n 86:\t\tbool \"UDP load balancing support\"\n 87:\t\thelp\n 88:\t\t This option enables support for load balancing UDP transport\n 89:\t\t protocol. Say Y if unsure.\n 90:\t\n 91:\tconfig\tIP_VS_PROTO_AH_ESP\n 92:\t\tdef_bool IP_VS_PROTO_ESP || IP_VS_PROTO_AH\n 93:\t\n 94:\tconfig\tIP_VS_PROTO_ESP\n 95:\t\tbool \"ESP load balancing support\"\n 96:\t\thelp\n 97:\t\t This option enables support for load balancing ESP (Encapsulation\n 98:\t\t Security Payload) transport protocol. Say Y if unsure.\n 99:\t\n 100:\tconfig\tIP_VS_PROTO_AH\n"
} |
| 15/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 15515 output: 39 thoughts: 6 Thoughts: Okay, I'm ready. Let's get to it. Here's how I'd approach summarizing, in the first person: **Diving In: Processing the Information** Alright, let's get into this text. My initial thought process is always a quick scan. I'm looking for the core elements, the central themes, and any immediate indicators of what makes this information unique or interesting. This first pass is really about getting my bearings, figuring out the landscape I'm about to traverse. What's the genre? What's the context? What's the overall direction? From there, I'll identify the key concepts and start drawing connections between them. I'll need to figure out what is most important, and what is merely supporting evidence. |
| 16/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig",
"FirstLine": 101,
"LineCount": 100
}Results: {
"Contents": " 101:\t\tbool \"AH load balancing support\"\n 102:\t\thelp\n 103:\t\t This option enables support for load balancing AH (Authentication\n 104:\t\t Header) transport protocol. Say Y if unsure.\n 105:\t\n 106:\tconfig IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP\n 107:\t\tbool \"SCTP load balancing support\"\n 108:\t\tselect NET_CRC32C\n 109:\t\thelp\n 110:\t\t This option enables support for load balancing SCTP transport\n 111:\t\t protocol. Say Y if unsure.\n 112:\t\n 113:\tcomment \"IPVS scheduler\"\n 114:\t\n 115:\tconfig\tIP_VS_RR\n 116:\t\ttristate \"round-robin scheduling\"\n 117:\t\thelp\n 118:\t\t The robin-robin scheduling algorithm simply directs network\n 119:\t\t connections to different real servers in a round-robin manner.\n 120:\t\n 121:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 122:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 123:\t \n 124:\tconfig\tIP_VS_WRR\n 125:\t\ttristate \"weighted round-robin scheduling\"\n 126:\t\thelp\n 127:\t\t The weighted robin-robin scheduling algorithm directs network\n 128:\t\t connections to different real servers based on server weights\n 129:\t\t in a round-robin manner. Servers with higher weights receive\n 130:\t\t new connections first than those with less weights, and servers\n 131:\t\t with higher weights get more connections than those with less\n 132:\t\t weights and servers with equal weights get equal connections.\n 133:\t\n 134:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 135:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 136:\t\n 137:\tconfig\tIP_VS_LC\n 138:\t\ttristate \"least-connection scheduling\"\n 139:\t\thelp\n 140:\t\t The least-connection scheduling algorithm directs network\n 141:\t\t connections to the server with the least number of active \n 142:\t\t connections.\n 143:\t\n 144:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 145:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 146:\t\n 147:\tconfig\tIP_VS_WLC\n 148:\t\ttristate \"weighted least-connection scheduling\"\n 149:\t\thelp\n 150:\t\t The weighted least-connection scheduling algorithm directs network\n 151:\t\t connections to the server with the least active connections\n 152:\t\t normalized by the server weight.\n 153:\t\n 154:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 155:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 156:\t\n 157:\tconfig IP_VS_FO\n 158:\t\t\ttristate \"weighted failover scheduling\"\n 159:\t\thelp\n 160:\t\t The weighted failover scheduling algorithm directs network\n 161:\t\t connections to the server with the highest weight that is\n 162:\t\t currently available.\n 163:\t\n 164:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 165:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 166:\t\n 167:\tconfig IP_VS_OVF\n 168:\t\ttristate \"weighted overflow scheduling\"\n 169:\t\thelp\n 170:\t\t The weighted overflow scheduling algorithm directs network\n 171:\t\t connections to the server with the highest weight that is\n 172:\t\t currently available and overflows to the next when active\n 173:\t\t connections exceed the node's weight.\n 174:\t\n 175:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 176:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 177:\t\n 178:\tconfig\tIP_VS_LBLC\n 179:\t\ttristate \"locality-based least-connection scheduling\"\n 180:\t\thelp\n 181:\t\t The locality-based least-connection scheduling algorithm is for\n 182:\t\t destination IP load balancing. It is usually used in cache cluster.\n 183:\t\t This algorithm usually directs packet destined for an IP address to\n 184:\t\t its server if the server is alive and under load. If the server is\n 185:\t\t overloaded (its active connection numbers is larger than its weight)\n 186:\t\t and there is a server in its half load, then allocate the weighted\n 187:\t\t least-connection server to this IP address.\n 188:\t\n 189:\t\t If you want to compile it in kernel, say Y. To compile it as a\n 190:\t\t module, choose M here. If unsure, say N.\n 191:\t\n 192:\tconfig IP_VS_LBLCR\n 193:\t\ttristate \"locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling\"\n 194:\t\thelp\n 195:\t\t The locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling\n 196:\t\t algorithm is also for destination IP load balancing. It is \n 197:\t\t usually used in cache cluster. It differs from the LBLC scheduling\n 198:\t\t as follows: the load balancer maintains mappings from a target\n 199:\t\t to a set of server nodes that can serve the target. Requests for\n 200:\t\t a target are assigned to the least-connection node in the target's\n"
} |
| 17/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 17267 output: 36 thoughts: 152 Thoughts: **Analyzing the Patch's Scope** Okay, so this patch hits a few key areas within the IPVS code. Specifically, I see it's touching `ip_vs_dh.c`, `ip_vs_lblc.c`, `ip_vs_lblcr.c`, `ip_vs_lc.c`, `ip_vs_proto_sctp.c`, and `ip_vs_proto_tcp.c`. That gives me a pretty good idea of what's involved. Given that, I'm going to need to ensure the appropriate kernel configuration options are enabled for this to work correctly. I'll need `IP_VS` for the core IPVS functionality, naturally. I see it touches both `TCP` and `SCTP`, so `IP_VS_PROTO_TCP` and `IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP` are definitely required. Further, it interacts with the different load-balancing methods, implying `IP_VS_DH`, `IP_VS_LBLC`, `IP_VS_LBLCR` and `IP_VS_LC` will be needed. My next step is to quickly double-check the Kconfig. Let's see if `IP_VS_DH` is actually configurable. I should confirm its existence and default settings so I can be sure I'm not missing anything crucial during the build. |
| 18/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "config IP_VS_DH",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 19/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 17766 output: 31 thoughts: 22 Thoughts: Here's my thought process, as if I were considering this question: **Investigating a Possible Connection** Okay, so the prompt mentions "DH." My first instinct is to see if this is related to something within the IPVS (IP Virtual Server) context. It's a key part of load balancing within the Linux kernel, so it's a very specific area. Let's see... what file would hold the configuration options for that? Ah, yes, `net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig` – the Kconfig file within that specific directory is where I'd expect to find definitions and settings related to the IPVS module. So, I need to check in `net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig` to see if there's anything there about "DH". Perhaps it stands for something like "Direct Handling" or "Dynamic Hash", or even something entirely different. The Kconfig file should define it. |
| 20/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "DH",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=192=config IP_VS_LBLCR\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-209-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:210:config\tIP_VS_DH\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-211-\ttristate \"destination hashing scheduling\"\n"
} |
| 21/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 18120 output: 43 thoughts: 454 Thoughts: **Analyzing the IPVS Patch for Destination Overload Handling** Okay, so this is definitely related to `IP_VS_DH`. Right, let's dive into this. First, I'm going to quickly scan the functions modified in the patch to get a feel for the scope. Looks like we have a new function, `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`, which is the immediate focus, and it's touching quite a few other areas: `ip_vs_bind_dest`, `ip_vs_unbind_dest`, things related to connection management (`ip_vs_check_template`, `ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush`, stats (`ip_vs_in_stats`, `ip_vs_out_stats`), hooks, dest management, and scheduling. It also looks like a lot of the destination related functionality is being updated. Now, I need to pinpoint the key areas. I'll focus on these functions: `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`, `__ip_vs_update_dest`, `ip_vs_add_dest`, `ip_vs_edit_dest`, `ip_vs_bind_dest`, `ip_vs_unbind_dest`, and the scheduling algorithms (`ip_vs_dh_schedule`, `ip_vs_lblc_schedule`, and `ip_vs_lc_schedule`). These are the likely points where the destination overload logic will be most apparent. I also want to check the nature of `__ip_vs_update_dest`. Is that function static? Understanding its scope is going to be important for determining where this overload handling is inserted in the destination data flow. |
| 22/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "__ip_vs_update_dest",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1344=static void\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1345:__ip_vs_update_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest *dest,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1346-\t\t struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest, int add)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1445=ip_vs_new_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1496-\tspin_lock_init(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1497:\t__ip_vs_update_dest(svc, dest, udest, 1);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1498-\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1514=ip_vs_add_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1574-\t\telse\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1575:\t\t\t__ip_vs_update_dest(svc, dest, udest, 1);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1576-\t} else {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1591=ip_vs_edit_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1629-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1630:\t__ip_vs_update_dest(svc, dest, udest, 0);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1631-\n"
} |
| 23/2 | 2026/08/01 22:11 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 19547 output: 42 thoughts: 66 Thoughts: Here's my summary, as I see it: **Considering Destination Management in the Kernel's IPVS Module** Okay, so I'm looking at this code, specifically around the destination management in the IPVS module. I'm seeing that `__ip_vs_update_dest` is declared as static, which immediately flags a potential issue. That's a red flag. Typically, static functions are meant for internal use only within a module. I need a more flexible approach, something that allows external manipulation of these destination entries. So, instead of relying on this internal function, I'm thinking I should leverage the more appropriate public facing functions that are supposed to handle these things - `ip_vs_add_dest`, `ip_vs_edit_dest`, and `ip_vs_new_dest`. Those seem like the correct tools for the job. They're designed for external interaction with the destination objects, which is what I need. But hold on a second... just to be completely sure, I'd better double-check the definition of `ip_vs_new_dest`. I don't want to get caught in another static trap! Let's just make sure that one *isn't* also limited to internal use. Time for a quick check. |
| 24/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_new_dest",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1444=static int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1445:ip_vs_new_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1446-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1514=ip_vs_add_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1579-\t\t */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1580:\t\tret = ip_vs_new_dest(svc, udest);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1581-\t}\n"
} |
| 25/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 20181 output: 45 thoughts: 53 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as my own: **Analyzing Destination Management in IPVS** Alright, let's see, the `ip_vs_new_dest` variable… that's a static entity, right? Got it. So, that implies that functions like `ip_vs_add_dest` and `ip_vs_edit_dest` are pretty robust in their handling of this static element. They're likely designed to integrate smoothly given that constraint. Now, that brings me to something else I need to investigate in more detail: `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`. I need to ensure that its mechanics remain sound given this fundamental static nature of `ip_vs_new_dest`. Let's see how that fits into the picture. |
| 26/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_dest_update_overload",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1299=void ip_vs_stats_free(struct ip_vs_stats *stats)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1311- */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1312:static void __ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1313-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1333-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1334:void ip_vs_dest_update_overload(struct ip_vs_dest *dest, int mode)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1335-{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1336-\tspin_lock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1337:\t__ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, mode);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1338-\tspin_unlock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1345=__ip_vs_update_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest *dest,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1416-\t\t\t (udest-\u003eu_threshold \u003e\u003e 2)));\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1417:\t\t__ip_vs_dest_update_overload(dest, 0);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1418-\t\tspin_unlock_bh(\u0026dest-\u003edst_lock);\n"
} |
| 27/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 20960 output: 42 thoughts: 40 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed from my own perspective: **Investigating a Potential Dynamic Overload in IPVS Destination Updates** Right, so `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` isn't a static condition. That immediately tells me it's likely linked to something dynamic within the connection tracking or load balancing process. My initial gut feeling is that it isn't an issue in the code itself. My next step is to drill down into the areas that directly interact with destination state changes. I need to understand what triggers the condition. Let me investigate `ip_vs_bind_dest` and `ip_vs_unbind_dest` first. Those are the functions responsible for adding and removing destination entries, and are obvious points of interaction. Understanding how these functions are being called, under what circumstances, and in what order will reveal the cause. Knowing this, I can begin my investigation. |
| 28/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_bind_dest",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c=1088=static inline void\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c:1089:ip_vs_bind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct ip_vs_dest *dest)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1090-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c=1167=void ip_vs_try_bind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1195-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c:1196:\t\tip_vs_bind_dest(cp, dest);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1197-\t\tspin_unlock_bh(\u0026cp-\u003elock);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c=1444=ip_vs_conn_new(const struct ip_vs_conn_param *p, int dest_af,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1524-\tcp-\u003edest = NULL;\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c:1525:\tip_vs_bind_dest(cp, dest);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1526-\n"
} |
| 29/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 21617 output: 42 thoughts: 37 Thoughts: Okay, here's my interpretation of those thoughts, summarized from my perspective as someone well-versed in this area: **Analyzing the Binding Strategy in the IPVS Kernel Module** Right, so I'm looking at the `ip_vs_bind_dest` function, and it's defined as `static inline`. This is significant because it means the compiler is likely to expand the code of `ip_vs_bind_dest` directly at the point where it's called. This can optimize performance by avoiding a function call overhead, essentially inlining the logic directly into the calling functions. It's a clear signal that this function is performance critical, probably small, and likely called very frequently within the IPVS internals. The choice of `static` also implies the function's scope is limited to the current compilation unit, which, in this context, makes perfect sense, preventing name collisions in larger codebases. Then I'm contrasting that with `ip_vs_try_bind_dest` and `ip_vs_conn_new`, neither of which are `static inline`. That's a different design decision. They are likely more complex, possibly involving more external calls or more substantial operations. The compiler is probably expected to handle them as standard functions with standard function call overhead. It's a clue that these functions are likely to be used for more intricate tasks and aren't as performance-sensitive at that fundamental, micro-optimization level. They're probably more about managing connections and trying to find the best destination, rather than a single, ultra-optimized binding lookup, where the overhead of the function call *would* matter. This tells me that the designers of IPVS have a good handle on where optimization is critical and where it's less so, and they are leveraging the inline keyword to the best effect. |
| 30/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_unbind_dest",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c=1167=void ip_vs_try_bind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1219- */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c:1220:static inline void ip_vs_unbind_dest(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1221-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c=1347=static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1393-\t\t\tip_vs_unbind_app(cp);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c:1394:\t\tip_vs_unbind_dest(cp);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1395-\t\tif (unlikely(cp-\u003eflags \u0026 IP_VS_CONN_F_NO_CPORT)) {\n"
} |
| 31/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 22374 output: 42 thoughts: 84 Thoughts: Okay, here's my interpretation of this logic, as though it were my own thought process, presented as a summary for a fellow expert: **Internal Connection Management in IPVS** Alright, I see the direction here. We're dealing with the internal workings of connection management within the IPVS framework. Since `ip_vs_unbind_dest` and `ip_vs_conn_expire` are declared static and therefore internal to their respective modules, I'll need to focus on the public-facing and non-static functions to achieve the desired outcome. That immediately suggests I should be looking at the interaction between `ip_vs_conn_new` and `ip_vs_try_bind_dest` as the points of interest. That makes sense; `ip_vs_conn_new` would handle the creation, and `ip_vs_try_bind_dest` would be responsible for attempting the destination binding. Now, I need to understand how different scheduler methods come into play in this new connection setup. I need to refresh my understanding of how each scheduler handles its own internal logic to deal with this connection creation. To do that, I'm going to quickly review how `ip_vs_dh_schedule`, `ip_vs_lblc_schedule`, and `ip_vs_lc_schedule` interact with this whole process. Getting a handle on how these schedules are set up will clarify the exact relationship with the `ip_vs_conn_new` and `ip_vs_try_bind_dest` steps. Essentially, I need to know *when* and *how* the scheduler's logic gets interwoven into the connection establishment. |
| 32/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_dh_schedule",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c=211=static struct ip_vs_dest *\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c:212:ip_vs_dh_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-213-\t\t struct ip_vs_iphdr *iph)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-241- */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c:242:static struct ip_vs_scheduler ip_vs_dh_scheduler =\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-243-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-246-\t.module =\t\tTHIS_MODULE,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c:247:\t.n_list =\t\tLIST_HEAD_INIT(ip_vs_dh_scheduler.n_list),\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-248-\t.init_service =\t\tip_vs_dh_init_svc,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-251-\t.del_dest =\t\tip_vs_dh_dest_changed,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c:252:\t.schedule =\t\tip_vs_dh_schedule,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-253-};\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c=256=static int __init ip_vs_dh_init(void)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-257-{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c:258:\treturn register_ip_vs_scheduler(\u0026ip_vs_dh_scheduler);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-259-}\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c=262=static void __exit ip_vs_dh_cleanup(void)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-263-{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c:264:\tunregister_ip_vs_scheduler(\u0026ip_vs_dh_scheduler);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.c-265-\tsynchronize_rcu();\n"
} |
| 33/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 23505 output: 42 thoughts: 78 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as my own: **Analyzing IPVS Destination Handling** Alright, I'm thinking about how these IPVS functions work under the hood. My initial assumption was that I could treat `ip_vs_add_dest`, `ip_vs_edit_dest`, `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`, and `ip_vs_conn_new` as a static set of functions to consider. I mean, they seem fundamental to destination management and connection handling, so it seemed like a good starting point. But hold on a second... `ip_vs_add_dest` and `ip_vs_edit_dest`... are they *truly* static in their behavior? My experience tells me there's often more complexity than meets the eye. I need to double-check that assumption; it's always a mistake to make those kinds of assumptions without digging deeper. Let me quickly verify if there's any dynamic behavior or conditional logic within those two functions specifically. It's crucial to identify if they operate the same way in all circumstances or if their behavior changes based on context or state. |
| 34/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_add_dest",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1513=static int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1514:ip_vs_add_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1515-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=3472=do_ip_vs_set_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, sockptr_t ptr, unsigned int len)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-3601-\tcase IP_VS_SO_SET_ADDDEST:\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:3602:\t\tret = ip_vs_add_dest(svc, \u0026udest);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-3603-\t\tbreak;\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=4685=static int ip_vs_genl_set_cmd(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4795-\tcase IPVS_CMD_NEW_DEST:\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4796:\t\tret = ip_vs_add_dest(svc, \u0026udest);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4797-\t\tbreak;\n"
} |
| 35/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 24287 output: 44 thoughts: 46 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as my own mental process: **Static Function Deep Dive** Hmm, `ip_vs_add_dest`... that's static. Right. Makes sense in its context. But, whenever I see a static function, my mind automatically starts tracing its usage. Let's see, where else is this likely to be used? It's time to check `do_ip_vs_set_ctl` and `ip_vs_genl_set_cmd`. I'm willing to bet they're static as well, considering the way the IPVS subsystem is structured. I need to confirm the scope of these functions to understand how they interact with each other and the larger system. Analyzing these static functions is essential to grasp the inner workings of this module and determine how they fit into the bigger picture. |
| 36/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "do_ip_vs_set_ctl",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=3471=static int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:3472:do_ip_vs_set_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, sockptr_t ptr, unsigned int len)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-3473-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=3951=static struct nf_sockopt_ops ip_vs_sockopts = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-3954-\t.set_optmax\t= IP_VS_SO_SET_MAX+1,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:3955:\t.set\t\t= do_ip_vs_set_ctl,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-3956-\t.get_optmin\t= IP_VS_BASE_CTL,\n"
} |
| 37/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 24826 output: 42 thoughts: 128 Thoughts: **Considering Non-Static Function Usage** Okay, I'm thinking specifically about the non-static functions within this code. I need to get a handle on how these are being used. So, I'm going through the list. Let's start with `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`. Non-static, good. Next, let's look at `ip_vs_conn_new` – that's non-static as well. Alright, moving on to `ip_vs_try_bind_dest`, also non-static. Let's keep going: `ip_vs_in_stats` is another non-static function. Same goes for `ip_vs_out_stats`. Finally, let's take a look at `ip_vs_in_hook`. |
| 38/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_in_hook",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2087=static unsigned int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2088:ip_vs_in_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2089-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2316=static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops4[] = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2327-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2328:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2329-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV4,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2341-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2342:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2343-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV4,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2365=static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops6[] = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2376-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2377:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2378-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV6,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2390-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2391:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2392-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV6,\n"
} |
| 39/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 25737 output: 40 thoughts: 24 Thoughts: Okay, here's my summary, tailored for an expert audience, as if I'm thinking these things myself: **Initial Assessment: Observing Stasis in the System** Right, this feels...static. Something's not flowing the way I expect, or something has stalled entirely. My gut tells me something is wrong with the Virtual Server's behavior, possibly the network interface. So, let's get right to the core of the problem. I need to immediately check the input and output counters. I'm focusing on the heart of the load-balancing mechanisms: I need a quick look at `ip_vs_in` and `ip_vs_out` to see if traffic is even hitting the virtual server, or if traffic is leaving the virtual server. This will give me a first indicator. They're my go-to diagnostic point for this kind of situation. |
| 40/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_in",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=89=const char *ip_vs_proto_name(unsigned int proto)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-113-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:114:void ip_vs_init_hash_table(struct list_head *table, int rows)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-115-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=299=static inline void\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:300:ip_vs_in_stats(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct sk_buff *skb)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-301-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=748=static inline int ip_vs_addr_is_unicast(struct net *net, int af,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-759- * Pass or drop the packet.\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:760: * Called by ip_vs_in, when the virtual service is available but\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-761- * no destination is available for a new connection.\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=763=int ip_vs_leave(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct sk_buff *skb,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-802-\t\t/* statistics */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:803:\t\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-804-\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=1641=ip_vs_try_to_schedule(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int af, struct sk_buff *skb,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1660-\t\tIP_VS_DBG_PKT(12, af, pp, skb, iph-\u003eoff,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1661:\t\t\t \"ip_vs_in: packet continues traversal as normal\");\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1662-\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=1752=static int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1753:ip_vs_in_icmp(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct sk_buff *skb, int *related,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1754-\t unsigned int hooknum, struct ip_vs_iphdr *iph)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1968-\t/* do the statistics and put it back */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1969:\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1970-\tverdict = ip_vs_icmp_xmit(skb, cp, pp, iph-\u003elen, hooknum, \u0026ciph);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1981-#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1982:static int ip_vs_in_icmp_v6(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct sk_buff *skb,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1983-\t\t\t int *related, unsigned int hooknum,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2067-\t/* do the statistics and put it back */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2068:\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2069-\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2087=static unsigned int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2088:ip_vs_in_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2089-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2137-\t\t\tint related;\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2138:\t\t\tint verdict = ip_vs_in_icmp_v6(ipvs, skb, \u0026related,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2139-\t\t\t\t\t\t hooknum, \u0026iph);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2147-\t\t\tint related;\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2148:\t\t\tint verdict = ip_vs_in_icmp(ipvs, skb, \u0026related,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2149-\t\t\t\t\t\t hooknum, \u0026iph);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2242-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2243:\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2244-\tip_vs_set_state(cp, IP_VS_DIR_INPUT, skb, pd, iph.len);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2280- * When fwmark-based virtual service is used, such as transparent\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2281: * cache cluster, TCP packets can be marked and routed to ip_vs_in,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2282- * but ICMP destined for 0.0.0.0/0 cannot not be easily marked and\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2283: * sent to ip_vs_in_icmp. So, catch them at the NF_INET_FORWARD chain\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2284: * and send them to ip_vs_in_icmp.\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2285- */\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2287=ip_vs_forward_icmp(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2308-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2309:\t\treturn ip_vs_in_icmp_v6(ipvs, skb, \u0026r, state-\u003ehook, \u0026iphdr);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2310-#endif\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2312-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2313:\treturn ip_vs_in_icmp(ipvs, skb, \u0026r, state-\u003ehook, \u0026iphdr);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2314-}\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2316=static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops4[] = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2327-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2328:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2329-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV4,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2332-\t},\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2333:\t/* Before ip_vs_in, change source only for VS/NAT */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2334-\t{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2341-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2342:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2343-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV4,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2365=static const struct nf_hook_ops ip_vs_ops6[] = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2376-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2377:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2378-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV6,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2381-\t},\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2382:\t/* Before ip_vs_in, change source only for VS/NAT */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2383-\t{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2390-\t{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2391:\t\t.hook\t\t= ip_vs_in_hook,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2392-\t\t.pf\t\t= NFPROTO_IPV6,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2443=void ip_vs_unregister_hooks(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, unsigned int af)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2471- */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2472:static int __net_init __ip_vs_init(struct net *net)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2473-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2559=static struct pernet_operations ipvs_core_ops = {\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2560:\t.init = __ip_vs_init,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2561-\t.exit_batch = __ip_vs_cleanup_batch,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2566=static struct pernet_operations ipvs_core_dev_ops = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2572- */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2573:static int __init ip_vs_init(void)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2574-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2622=static void __exit ip_vs_cleanup(void)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2636-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2637:module_init(ip_vs_init);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2638-module_exit(ip_vs_cleanup);\n"
} |
| 41/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 29111 output: 45 thoughts: 29 Thoughts: Okay, here's my interpretation of those thoughts, tailored for an expert audience, presented in the first person: **IPVS Internal Structure Considerations** Right, `ip_vs_in_hook` is static, which is a key observation. Now, I need to understand its relationship and how it's used within the broader context of the IPVS implementation. Let's dig into the function that's likely manipulating that: `ip_vs_genl_set_cmd`. This is where configuration or modifications related to that hook probably originate. Understanding this command will give me the information I need to confirm my assumptions. The static nature implies a global, fixed point of interaction, and I need to see how the management interface interacts with it. |
| 42/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_genl_set_cmd",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=4660=static int ip_vs_genl_set_daemon(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4684-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4685:static int ip_vs_genl_set_cmd(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4686-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=4916=static const struct genl_small_ops ip_vs_genl_ops[] = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4920-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4921:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4922-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4926-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4927:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4928-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4932-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4933:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4934-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4945-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4946:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4947-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4951-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4952:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4953-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4957-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4958:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4959-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4987-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4988:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-4989-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-5005-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:5006:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-5007-\t},\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-5011-\t\t.flags\t= GENL_ADMIN_PERM,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:5012:\t\t.doit\t= ip_vs_genl_set_cmd,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-5013-\t},\n"
} |
| 43/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 30445 output: 42 thoughts: 96 Thoughts: Here's my thought process, as if I were working through this: **Analyzing the Static Nature and API Usage** Okay, so `ip_vs_genl_set_cmd` is static. That's a key piece of information. Since I can't directly access that, I need to figure out how to achieve my goal using the available tools. I'll need to work around the restriction, of course. Right, so to make this happen, I'll need to lean on a series of functions that are exposed. I will definitely need to use `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`, `ip_vs_conn_new`, and `ip_vs_try_bind_dest`, they are the logical choices here. But wait a minute, I see that both `ip_vs_in_stats` and `ip_vs_out_stats` are defined as *static inline*. That changes things a bit. They *should* still be usable in their respective files, but they won't be exposed for use outside of the source where they are defined. I'll need to keep that in mind as I map out how to build the solution. |
| 44/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_in_stats",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=299=static inline void\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:300:ip_vs_in_stats(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, struct sk_buff *skb)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-301-{\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=763=int ip_vs_leave(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct sk_buff *skb,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-802-\t\t/* statistics */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:803:\t\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-804-\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=1753=ip_vs_in_icmp(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct sk_buff *skb, int *related,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1968-\t/* do the statistics and put it back */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1969:\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-1970-\tverdict = ip_vs_icmp_xmit(skb, cp, pp, iph-\u003elen, hooknum, \u0026ciph);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=1982=static int ip_vs_in_icmp_v6(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct sk_buff *skb,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2067-\t/* do the statistics and put it back */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2068:\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2069-\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c=2088=ip_vs_in_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_hook_state *state)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2242-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2243:\tip_vs_in_stats(cp, skb);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c-2244-\tip_vs_set_state(cp, IP_VS_DIR_INPUT, skb, pd, iph.len);\n"
} |
| 45/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 31558 output: 42 thoughts: 21 Thoughts: Here's my take on the thought process: **Static Inline Analysis & Template Verification** Okay, so I've confirmed that the functions in question are indeed static inline. That's a key observation, impacting how they're handled during compilation and linking. Now, to dig deeper and understand their role in the overall system, I need to investigate the function `ip_vs_check_template`. This function is likely where the template's properties are assessed, and this is where I need to focus my attention. It will provide a deeper understanding of the system. |
| 46/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_check_template",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c=1257=static int expire_quiescent_template(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1272- */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c:1273:int ip_vs_check_template(struct ip_vs_conn *ct, struct ip_vs_dest *cdest)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1274-{\n"
} |
| 47/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 31891 output: 47 thoughts: 33 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as an expert's internal monologue: **Diving into the IPVS Implementation** Alright, so `ip_vs_check_template` isn't static, which immediately sparks a thought process. I need to understand the implications of that non-static declaration. Where is it being used? What’s its scope? What's the context surrounding this declaration? Is it thread-safe, or are there potential concurrency issues I need to be aware of? Are there any potential reentrancy problems to look at? This will drive my exploration and the level of scrutiny I will need to apply during my evaluation of the code. Now, let's turn our attention to `ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush`. This sounds like it deals with flushing connections that are not linked to any specific destination host. I'm going to start by getting a complete understanding of how this function fits into the overall connection tracking and expiration strategy within IPVS. I'll need to trace its call sites, determine its triggering conditions, and fully understand its role in maintaining connection table integrity. I'll need to see if it is used correctly, and if there are any race conditions that need to be addressed. Specifically, is it part of a larger, coordinated cleanup mechanism? Does it interact with other expiration or garbage collection routines? The context matters here; I'll need to investigate its place in the lifecycle of a connection in the IPVS system. |
| 48/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c=1934=static void ip_vs_conn_flush(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1997-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c:1998:void ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c-1999-{\n"
} |
| 49/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 32435 output: 42 thoughts: 33 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as my own reasoning: **IPVS Connection Flushing Considerations** Alright, so `ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush` isn't static, which is good to know. It means its value or state can change during runtime, suggesting it's potentially dynamic and tied to the current state of the system or network. This is useful for me because I can now consider the code that sets or modifies it for tuning the IPVS load balancer. Now, since we're dealing with connection flushing, let me pivot and check how `ip_vs_stats_free` works. I need to understand how the statistics are handled when connections are flushed or expire. It's crucial to understand this connection and how its lifecycle is managed so that I can have a clear idea as to whether stale data is being collected and, therefore, how to correctly interpret the resulting statistics. I'm thinking I need to find the specific parts of the code to see if there are any race conditions that need to be addressed. |
| 50/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_stats_free",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c=1294=void ip_vs_stats_release(struct ip_vs_stats *stats)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1298-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:1299:void ip_vs_stats_free(struct ip_vs_stats *stats)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c-1300-{\n"
} |
| 51/2 | 2026/08/01 22:12 | llm | patch-evaluator |
5mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 32873 output: 46 thoughts: 36 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as an expert's internal monologue: **Investigating `ip_vs_stats_free` and State Management** Alright, so the fact that `ip_vs_stats_free` isn't declared `static` immediately catches my attention. That opens a few doors, and some potential areas of concern. Let's see how and *where* that function is used – it's crucial for understanding its scope and potential impact. My immediate thought is to trace its usage patterns; how many places does it get called and from where. What are we expecting to see? Now, given that context, the code's focus seems to be on handling connection state. It's a natural progression to check out the related functions – `set_sctp_state` and `set_tcp_state`. These likely play a vital role in managing the state of both SCTP and TCP connections within the context of IPVS. I'll need to analyze how state transitions are implemented in those functions, what the valid states are, and how that information is being stored and utilized. Understanding the state management here is key to understanding the underlying design, including how these functions might or might not interact with `ip_vs_stats_free`. I will need to understand what's in these functions, and what sort of work they perform. |
| 52/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "set_sctp_state",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c=376=static inline void\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c:377:set_sctp_state(struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c-378-\t\tint direction, const struct sk_buff *skb,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c=466=sctp_state_transition(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, int direction,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c-470-\tspin_lock_bh(\u0026cp-\u003elock);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c:471:\tset_sctp_state(pd, cp, direction, skb, iph_len);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c-472-\tspin_unlock_bh(\u0026cp-\u003elock);\n"
} |
| 53/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 33545 output: 46 thoughts: 27 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as an expert's internal monologue: **SCTP State Transition Discrepancies** Hmm, so I'm looking at this SCTP code... and something's just snagged my attention. I see that `set_sctp_state` is declared as `static inline`. Right, that's standard practice, keeps the function localized to the current translation unit and enables the compiler to optimize it aggressively – likely inlining it where it's called, reducing function call overhead. Makes perfect sense. But then, I notice `sctp_state_transition`. And... it doesn't appear to be `static`, which implies it's potentially visible to other parts of the module, and perhaps even externally. That raises a question immediately. Is it meant to be a generally accessible function? What's the design intent? Is this function called from other parts of the code base that are not inlined? The apparent difference in declaration seems significant. Does the code intend for external use of the transition function? Is this a potential bug? Time to dive a little deeper, I need to understand why this discrepancy exists between `set_sctp_state` and `sctp_state_transition` and their role in SCTP's state management. I need to know why one is `static inline` and the other isn't. I'm guessing the transition function is complex, and used more broadly. |
| 54/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "sctp_state_transition",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c=465=static void\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c:466:sctp_state_transition(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, int direction,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c-467-\t\tconst struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c=567=struct ip_vs_protocol ip_vs_protocol_sctp = {\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c-583-\t.state_name\t= sctp_state_name,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c:584:\t.state_transition = sctp_state_transition,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c-585-\t.app_conn_bind\t= sctp_app_conn_bind,\n"
} |
| 55/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 34230 output: 42 thoughts: 24 Thoughts: Here's my take on those thoughts, tailored for an expert audience: **Analyzing the State Transition Logic** Okay, so `sctp_state_transition` is declared as static. This immediately flags a specific design choice: it's not meant to be directly exposed or called externally from other modules. It's likely intended as an internal utility function within the SCTP state management code. Therefore, I need to focus my investigation within that particular scope. Given this restriction, I'll shift gears and look directly at `set_tcp_state` to see if there is an interaction there. I'm assuming that function might play a part in updating an sctp state based on an update from a TCP-related issue. |
| 56/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "set_tcp_state",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c=475=static inline void\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c:476:set_tcp_state(struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c-477-\t int direction, struct tcphdr *th)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c=550=tcp_state_transition(struct ip_vs_conn *cp, int direction,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c-561-\tspin_lock_bh(\u0026cp-\u003elock);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c:562:\tset_tcp_state(pd, cp, direction, th);\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c-563-\tspin_unlock_bh(\u0026cp-\u003elock);\n"
} |
| 57/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 34723 output: 42 thoughts: 24 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as an expert's internal monologue: **Investigating TCP State Transitions** Alright, so `tcp_state_transition` is declared as static. Interesting. I need to understand the implications of that for the overall system. Let me quickly refresh my memory on the likely scope and purpose of that particular variable or function. Now, a static declaration usually means it's limited in scope, likely internal to its compilation unit. I need to determine how that affects its accessibility and potential impact on concurrent access or state management within the TCP/IP stack. Now, let's pivot. Given that I have this in front of me, I need to check something related to IPVS connection handling. Let's see how `ip_vs_proc_conn` interacts with this particular mechanism. I want to see if `tcp_state_transition` plays a role within the VS layer and if the static declaration creates any unexpected bottlenecks. I'm thinking about concurrent connections and the overall performance impact. I bet `ip_vs_proc_conn` will reveal how this static element fits into the broader picture of connection tracking and load balancing. |
| 58/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ip_vs_proc_conn",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c=788=ip_vs_conn_fill_param_sync(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int af, union ip_vs_sync_conn *sc,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-840- */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:841:static void ip_vs_proc_conn(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, struct ip_vs_conn_param *param,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-842-\t\t\t unsigned int flags, unsigned int state,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c=955=static void ip_vs_process_message_v0(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, const char *buffer,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-1014-\t\t/* Send timeout as Zero */\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1015:\t\tip_vs_proc_conn(ipvs, \u0026param, flags, state, s-\u003eprotocol, AF_INET,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-1016-\t\t\t\t(union nf_inet_addr *)\u0026s-\u003edaddr, s-\u003edport,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c=1066=static inline int ip_vs_proc_sync_conn(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, __u8 *p, __u8 *msg_end)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-1173-\tif (af == AF_INET)\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1174:\t\tip_vs_proc_conn(ipvs, \u0026param, flags, state, s-\u003ev4.protocol, af,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-1175-\t\t\t\t(union nf_inet_addr *)\u0026s-\u003ev4.daddr, s-\u003ev4.dport,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-1180-\telse\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1181:\t\tip_vs_proc_conn(ipvs, \u0026param, flags, state, s-\u003ev6.protocol, af,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c-1182-\t\t\t\t(union nf_inet_addr *)\u0026s-\u003ev6.daddr, s-\u003ev6.dport,\n"
} |
| 59/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 35694 output: 46 thoughts: 43 Thoughts: Okay, let's see... **Analyzing `ip_vs_proc_conn` and Routing Functions** Right, so `ip_vs_proc_conn` is apparently static. That's a key piece of information. Now, what's going on around it? I need to understand its relationship to the routing process. My immediate thought is to check how outbound routes are handled. Specifically, let's dive into the implementations of `ip_vs_get_out_rt` and `ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6`. They're probably crucial for understanding how connection information interacts with the routing logic within the IPVS framework, especially in terms of IPv4 and IPv6. I want to see how these functions determine the correct outbound route for a connection, which is likely dependent on the static nature of `ip_vs_proc_conn`. I need to assess whether these functions are directly or indirectly utilizing, or affected by `ip_vs_proc_conn`. This seems like a reasonable next step in this investigation. |
| 60/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "__ip_vs_get_out_rt",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=315=static int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:316:__ip_vs_get_out_rt(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int skb_af, struct sk_buff *skb,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-317-\t\t struct ip_vs_dest *dest,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=488=static int\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:489:__ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, int skb_af, struct sk_buff *skb,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-490-\t\t struct ip_vs_dest *dest,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=736=ip_vs_bypass_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-738-{\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:739:\tif (__ip_vs_get_out_rt(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, NULL, ip_hdr(skb)-\u003edaddr,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-740-\t\t\t IP_VS_RT_MODE_NON_LOCAL, NULL, ipvsh) \u003c 0)\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=759=ip_vs_bypass_xmit_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-763-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:764:\tif (__ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, NULL,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-765-\t\t\t\t \u0026iph-\u003edaddr, NULL,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=787=ip_vs_nat_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-804-\twas_input = rt_is_input_route(skb_rtable(skb));\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:805:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest, cp-\u003edaddr.ip,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-806-\t\t\t\t IP_VS_RT_MODE_LOCAL |\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=871=ip_vs_nat_xmit_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-886-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:887:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-888-\t\t\t\t \u0026cp-\u003edaddr.in6,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=1147=ip_vs_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1165-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:1166:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt(ipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest, cp-\u003edaddr.ip,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1167-\t\t\t\t IP_VS_RT_MODE_LOCAL |\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=1292=ip_vs_tunnel_xmit_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1309-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:1310:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(ipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1311-\t\t\t\t \u0026cp-\u003edaddr.in6,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=1439=ip_vs_dr_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1443-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:1444:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest, cp-\u003edaddr.ip,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1445-\t\t\t\t IP_VS_RT_MODE_LOCAL |\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=1469=ip_vs_dr_xmit_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1473-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:1474:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1475-\t\t\t\t \u0026cp-\u003edaddr.in6,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=1504=ip_vs_icmp_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1536-\t\t IP_VS_RT_MODE_RDR : IP_VS_RT_MODE_NON_LOCAL;\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:1537:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest, cp-\u003edaddr.ip, rt_mode,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1538-\t\t\t\t NULL, ciph);\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c=1598=ip_vs_icmp_xmit_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_conn *cp,\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1629-\t\t IP_VS_RT_MODE_RDR : IP_VS_RT_MODE_NON_LOCAL;\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:1630:\tlocal = __ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6(cp-\u003eipvs, cp-\u003eaf, skb, cp-\u003edest,\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c-1631-\t\t\t\t \u0026cp-\u003edaddr.in6, NULL, ciph, 0, rt_mode);\n"
} |
| 61/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 38018 output: 36 thoughts: 718 Thoughts: **Analyzing the IPVS Patch** Okay, so I'm digging into this IPVS patch. First, I've noted that `__ip_vs_get_out_rt` and `__ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6` are static, so the core functions to examine in terms of how this might change behavior are going to be `ip_vs_nat_xmit`, `ip_vs_tunnel_xmit`, `ip_vs_dr_xmit`, `ip_vs_icmp_xmit`, and `ip_vs_bypass_xmit`. Now, let's look at the important symbols and their relationship to the overall picture: `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`, `ip_vs_conn_new`, `ip_vs_try_bind_dest`, `ip_vs_check_template`, `ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush`, `ip_vs_stats_free`, and the `xmit` functions mentioned before. Wait, looks like `ip_vs_stats_free` is just freeing stats, so it's not terribly interesting in this context. `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` seems to be a key new function, so that's something to investigate further. `ip_vs_conn_new` and `ip_vs_try_bind_dest` both call the modified function `ip_vs_bind_dest`. `ip_vs_check_template` and `ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush` are looking at the `dest->cflags` structure. The `xmit` functions like `ip_vs_nat_xmit` also call `__ip_vs_get_out_rt` which checks `dest->cflags`. So I'm seeing a pattern here with that `dest->cflags`. I've confirmed that `ip_vs_conn_new`, `ip_vs_try_bind_dest`, `ip_vs_check_template`, and `ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush` are all non-static functions, so they should be easy to hook into. Now for the configurations. It looks like the relevant configs for this are `IP_VS`, `IP_VS_PROTO_TCP`, `IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP`, `IP_VS_DH`, `IP_VS_LBLC`, `IP_VS_LBLCR`, and `IP_VS_LC`. Oh, wait...the last four are schedulers! And the patch modifies `ip_vs_dh.c`, `ip_vs_lblc.c`, `ip_vs_lblcr.c`, and `ip_vs_lc.c`. Makes sense, so these schedulers are definitely important configurations to enable. Let's double check those config names to be absolutely sure: `IP_VS_DH`, `IP_VS_LBLC`, `IP_VS_LBLCR`, `IP_VS_LC`, `IP_VS_PROTO_TCP`, `IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP`, and `IP_VS`. Just to be sure, let's peek at `IP_VS_DH` in the `Kconfig` file in the netfilter ipvs directory. |
| 62/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "config IP_VS_DH",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 63/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 39503 output: 37 thoughts: 23 Thoughts: Here's my thought process, summarized as you requested: **Recalling Previous Investigation** Okay, hold on a second. I distinctly remember verifying something related to `DH` just recently, probably in the context of configuring IPVS. Let me mentally retrace my steps... Ah, yes! I was looking at the configuration options and *definitely* confirmed that `DH` was mapped to `config IP_VS_DH`. I even recall it specifically using a tab for indentation, which is a detail I usually pay attention to for readability. So, I don't need to double-check that particular association right now. That's already been addressed. |
| 64/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config\tIP_VS_DH",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=192=config IP_VS_LBLCR\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-209-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:210:config\tIP_VS_DH\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-211-\ttristate \"destination hashing scheduling\"\n"
} |
| 65/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 39803 output: 39 thoughts: 16 Thoughts: Here's my attempt at summarizing the thought process, tailored for an expert audience: **Internal Review: IP_VS_LBLC** Okay, yes, I'm ready to begin this. Let's start by immediately checking the `IP_VS_LBLC` aspect, as that's the core focus here. This is a crucial area and needs to be evaluated first. This is where I'll focus my attention for now. |
| 66/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config\tIP_VS_LBLC",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=167=config IP_VS_OVF\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-177-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:178:config\tIP_VS_LBLC\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-179-\ttristate \"locality-based least-connection scheduling\"\n"
} |
| 67/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 40062 output: 39 thoughts: 16 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, tailored for an expert audience: **Analyzing the Landscape** Yes, that's the obvious starting point. I need to get a firm grasp on the current situation. Let's start with a thorough examination of `IP_VS_LBLCR`. That will be my initial area of investigation. It contains data that is relevant to my task. |
| 68/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config IP_VS_LBLCR",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=178=config\tIP_VS_LBLC\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-191-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:192:config IP_VS_LBLCR\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-193-\ttristate \"locality-based least-connection with replication scheduling\"\n"
} |
| 69/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 40312 output: 37 thoughts: 14 Thoughts: Okay, here's my attempt at summarizing that thought process, keeping in mind I'm speaking to an expert: **Internal Assessment and Direction** Yes, that's the starting point. I acknowledge the prior state and agree to move forward. Now, the critical next step is to examine `IP_VS_LC`. This means I'm immediately shifting focus to a specific and likely crucial element, which I'm assuming has a significance we both understand. It’s a direct check on that variable or concept. I need to understand that relationship, and make a decision based on the result. |
| 70/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config\tIP_VS_LC",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=124=config\tIP_VS_WRR\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-136-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:137:config\tIP_VS_LC\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-138-\ttristate \"least-connection scheduling\"\n"
} |
| 71/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 40591 output: 39 thoughts: 28 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, framed as an expert's internal monologue: **Checking Protocol Specifics** Yes, that feels right, the core principle is solid. Now, I need to make sure I'm precise. Let's drill down into the specific implementations. Specifically, I should probably check the current status of `IP_VS_PROTO_TCP` and `IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP` right now. Need to make sure the latest revisions and patches are taken into account, any recent edge-cases considered. I can't afford any assumptions here. Gotta be comprehensive. |
| 72/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config\tIP_VS_PROTO_TCP",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=77=comment \"IPVS transport protocol load balancing support\"\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-78-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:79:config\tIP_VS_PROTO_TCP\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-80-\tbool \"TCP load balancing support\"\n"
} |
| 73/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 40888 output: 41 thoughts: 0 |
| 74/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP",
"PathPrefix": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"Output": "net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig=100=config\tIP_VS_PROTO_AH\n--\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-105-\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig:106:config IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP\nnet/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig-107-\tbool \"SCTP load balancing support\"\n"
} |
| 75/2 | 2026/08/01 22:18 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 41037 output: 327 thoughts: 388 Thoughts: **My Assessment of the IPVS Patch for Fuzzing** Right, I'm with this patch. Looking at it, the relevant configurations are clearly: `IP_VS`, `IP_VS_PROTO_TCP`, `IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP`, `IP_VS_DH`, `IP_VS_LBLC`, `IP_VS_LBLCR`, and `IP_VS_LC`. We're dealing with the core IPVS functionality here. The key symbols to target for fuzzing jump out at me: `ip_vs_dest_update_overload`, `ip_vs_conn_new`, `ip_vs_try_bind_dest`, `ip_vs_check_template`, `ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush`, and especially the transmission functions like `ip_vs_nat_xmit`, `ip_vs_tunnel_xmit`, `ip_vs_dr_xmit`, and `ip_vs_icmp_xmit`. Those `ip_vs_*_xmit` functions are hot paths, so a solid place to test the `dest->cflags` check. Including them is definitely the right call. The `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` is the focal point of the changes. Let's break down the reasoning for my own benefit... This patch is all about tweaking IPVS's destination connection tracking and how it handles the overload flag. It's swapping `inactconns` for `totalconns`, adding the `cflags` for configuration flags, and shifting `IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE` to `IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE`. And, that critical `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` function is going to be setting that overload flag based on configurable thresholds. These are core functional changes, touching both the core logic and schedulers. Given the changes, the fuzzing needs to focus on those areas I identified before: connection binding and unbinding, destination updates, and the packet transmission paths. Specifically, the areas that check the availability and overload status of the destinations are what we should focus on. Seems like a solid plan. I'm ready to move forward. |
| 76/2 | 2026/08/01 22:19 | tool | set-results |
0mArgs:{
"EnableConfigs": [
"IP_VS",
"IP_VS_PROTO_TCP",
"IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP",
"IP_VS_DH",
"IP_VS_LBLC",
"IP_VS_LBLCR",
"IP_VS_LC"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"ip_vs_dest_update_overload",
"ip_vs_conn_new",
"ip_vs_try_bind_dest",
"ip_vs_check_template",
"ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush",
"ip_vs_nat_xmit",
"ip_vs_tunnel_xmit",
"ip_vs_dr_xmit",
"ip_vs_icmp_xmit"
],
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies IPVS destination server connection tracking and overload flag updates. It introduces `totalconns` to replace `inactconns` and adds `cflags` for config flags, moving `IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE` to `IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE`. It also adds `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` to update the overload flag based on thresholds. These are functional changes to the IPVS core logic and schedulers. Fuzzing should focus on connection binding/unbinding, destination updates, and packet transmission paths that check the availability and overload status of destinations.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
}Results: {
"EnableConfigs": [
"IP_VS",
"IP_VS_PROTO_TCP",
"IP_VS_PROTO_SCTP",
"IP_VS_DH",
"IP_VS_LBLC",
"IP_VS_LBLCR",
"IP_VS_LC"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"ip_vs_dest_update_overload",
"ip_vs_conn_new",
"ip_vs_try_bind_dest",
"ip_vs_check_template",
"ip_vs_expire_nodest_conn_flush",
"ip_vs_nat_xmit",
"ip_vs_tunnel_xmit",
"ip_vs_dr_xmit",
"ip_vs_icmp_xmit"
],
"Reasoning": "The patch modifies IPVS destination server connection tracking and overload flag updates. It introduces `totalconns` to replace `inactconns` and adds `cflags` for config flags, moving `IP_VS_DEST_F_AVAILABLE` to `IP_VS_DEST_CF_AVAILABLE`. It also adds `ip_vs_dest_update_overload` to update the overload flag based on thresholds. These are functional changes to the IPVS core logic and schedulers. Fuzzing should focus on connection binding/unbinding, destination updates, and packet transmission paths that check the availability and overload status of destinations.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
} |
| Total Calls | Total Tokens | Avg Tokens | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|
| Total Calls | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|