======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.5.363/9445 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888038133278 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888039530950 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_this_handle+0x1f87/0x21c0

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       start_this_handle+0x1fa7/0x21c0
       jbd2__journal_start+0x2c1/0x5b0
       jbd2_journal_start+0x2a/0x40
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x376/0x6d0
       ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x711/0x4640
       ocfs2_reserve_new_inode+0x4f4/0xcc0
       ocfs2_mknod+0x83c/0x2050
       ocfs2_mkdir+0x191/0x440
       vfs_mkdir+0x306/0x510
       do_mkdirat+0x247/0x590
       __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #3 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_read+0x46/0x2e0
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x36a/0x6d0
       ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x711/0x4640
       ocfs2_reserve_new_inode+0x4f4/0xcc0
       ocfs2_mknod+0x83c/0x2050
       ocfs2_mkdir+0x191/0x440
       vfs_mkdir+0x306/0x510
       do_mkdirat+0x247/0x590
       __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       ocfs2_start_trans+0x26b/0x6d0
       ocfs2_truncate_file+0x643/0x1420
       ocfs2_setattr+0x1520/0x1b40
       notify_change+0xb36/0xe40
       do_truncate+0x1a4/0x220
       path_openat+0x306c/0x3830
       do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410
       do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0
       __x64_sys_open+0x11e/0x150
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (&ocfs2_file_ip_alloc_sem_key){++++}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_write+0x96/0x1f0
       ocfs2_try_remove_refcount_tree+0xb6/0x320
       ocfs2_truncate_file+0xda0/0x1420
       ocfs2_setattr+0x1520/0x1b40
       notify_change+0xb36/0xe40
       do_truncate+0x1a4/0x220
       path_openat+0x306c/0x3830
       do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410
       do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0
       __x64_sys_open+0x11e/0x150
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&oi->ip_xattr_sem){++++}-{4:4}:
       validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140
       __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20
       lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
       down_read+0x46/0x2e0
       ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720
       ocfs2_mknod+0x1321/0x2050
       ocfs2_create+0x1a5/0x440
       path_openat+0x14f4/0x3830
       do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410
       do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0
       __x64_sys_open+0x11e/0x150
       do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &oi->ip_xattr_sem --> &journal->j_trans_barrier --> jbd2_handle

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(jbd2_handle);
                               lock(&journal->j_trans_barrier);
                               lock(jbd2_handle);
  rlock(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

8 locks held by syz.5.363/9445:
 #0: ffff88811f0d0428 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90
 #1: ffff888038133540 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#11){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: path_openat+0x8da/0x3830
 #2: ffff88811c0909c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[INODE_ALLOC_SYSTEM_INODE]){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x15e/0x4640
 #3: ffff8880381309c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[EXTENT_ALLOC_SYSTEM_INODE]){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_suballoc_bits+0x15e/0x4640
 #4: ffff88811c0943c0 (&ocfs2_sysfile_lock_key[LOCAL_ALLOC_SYSTEM_INODE]){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_reserve_local_alloc_bits+0x125/0x24e0
 #5: ffff88811f0d0618 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ocfs2_mknod+0xe93/0x2050
 #6: ffff88802a89e4e8 (&journal->j_trans_barrier){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: ocfs2_start_trans+0x36a/0x6d0
 #7: ffff888039530950 (jbd2_handle){++++}-{0:0}, at: start_this_handle+0x1f87/0x21c0

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 9445 Comm: syz.5.363 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250
 print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310
 check_noncircular+0x134/0x160
 validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140
 __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20
 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360
 down_read+0x46/0x2e0
 ocfs2_init_acl+0x2f9/0x720
 ocfs2_mknod+0x1321/0x2050
 ocfs2_create+0x1a5/0x440
 path_openat+0x14f4/0x3830
 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410
 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0
 __x64_sys_open+0x11e/0x150
 do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f42f0d8ec29
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f42f1bb7038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f42f0fd6090 RCX: 00007f42f0d8ec29
RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 0000000000060142 RDI: 0000200000000000
RBP: 00007f42f0e11e41 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f42f0fd6128 R14: 00007f42f0fd6090 R15: 00007ffe9bca4e58
 </TASK>
