| Seq | Timestamp | Type | Name | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/0 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | flow | patch-triage |
2mArgs:null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": [
"SCHED_CLASS_EXT"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"scx_bpf_dsq_reenq",
"scx_bpf_destroy_dsq"
],
"KMSANReasoning": "The patch replaces a BUG_ON() with a conditional check and a `continue` statement to handle a race condition where `destroy_dsq()` might invalidate a dispatch queue (`dsq`). This change prevents a kernel panic (BUG_ON) and handles the race gracefully. It does not introduce any new allocations, copy data to user space, or involve uninitialized memory. Any potential use-after-free issues related to the race condition would be caught by KASAN. Therefore, KMSAN is not required.",
"NeedsKMSAN": false,
"Reasoning": "The patch fixes a race condition in the extensible scheduler class (sched_ext) where a custom dispatch queue (DSQ) could be destroyed while there are still pending deferred re-enqueue operations. This is a core scheduling logic fix that is reachable when a BPF scheduler is loaded and uses custom DSQs.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
} |
| 1/1 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | action | read-patch-diff |
0mArgs:null Results: {
"PatchDiff": "commit 8df74a5e487b644f699a225bbaf5d69064e5a35a\nAuthor: syz-cluster \u003ctriage@syzkaller.com\u003e\nDate: Tue Aug 11 09:03:27 2026 +0000\n\n syz-cluster: applied patch under review\n\ndiff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c\nindex 0bbe144c98111..604a05da41b93 100644\n--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c\n+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c\n@@ -4531,7 +4531,9 @@ static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)\n \t\t/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */\n \t\tsmp_mb();\n \n-\t\tBUG_ON(dsq-\u003eid \u0026 SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN);\n+\t\t/* destroy_dsq() may race and invalidate @dsq; skip */\n+\t\tif (unlikely(dsq-\u003eid \u0026 SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN))\n+\t\t\tcontinue;\n \t\treenq_user(rq, dsq, reenq_flags);\n \t}\n }\n"
} |
| 2/1 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | agent | patch-evaluator |
2mModel:best-expensive Args: null Results: {
"EnableConfigs": [
"SCHED_CLASS_EXT"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"scx_bpf_dsq_reenq",
"scx_bpf_destroy_dsq"
],
"Reasoning": "The patch fixes a race condition in the extensible scheduler class (sched_ext) where a custom dispatch queue (DSQ) could be destroyed while there are still pending deferred re-enqueue operations. This is a core scheduling logic fix that is reachable when a BPF scheduler is loaded and uses custom DSQs.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
}Instruction: You are an expert Linux kernel maintainer. Your job is to review a provided patch series and determine if it makes functional changes to the kernel that should be fuzzed. IMPORTANT: The changes have ALREADY been applied and committed as the HEAD commit in your workspace. Do NOT rely on your internal knowledge of the kernel. You must actively use your code access tools to examine the actual source code and confirm any assumptions. Return WorthFuzzing=false if the patch only contains: - Modifications to Documentation/, Kconfig files, or code comments. - Purely decorative changes, such as logging (e.g., pr_err, printk) or tracepoints. - Changes to numeric constants or macros that do not functionally alter execution flow. - Code paths that are impossible to reach in virtualized environments like GCE or QEMU, even when utilizing software-emulated hardware (e.g., usb gadget, mac80211_hwsim). - Code in vendor-specific PCIe switch, SmartNIC, or GPU drivers (e.g., mlxsw, pds_core, qed, ionic, amdgpu) that require physical PCIe hardware cards not emulated in standard QEMU. - Driver .remove, .shutdown, or pci_unregister_driver teardown callbacks (e.g., igb_remove) that are executed only during PCI hot-unplug or sysfs driver unbind operations. If it modifies reachable core kernel logic, drivers, or architectures, use your code search tools to verify the code can be executed, then return WorthFuzzing=true. When returning WorthFuzzing=true, you MUST ALSO: 1. Extract any specific kernel functions that should be heavily fuzzed into FocusSymbols. Avoid listing generic hot-path functions to prevent skewed test distributions. Prefer non-static, non-inlined API entrypoint functions over internal static helper functions (which are inlined by the compiler and do not have distinct symbol addresses). 2. Identify any specific CONFIG_ options required to properly test this new/modified feature. Go and look into the Kconfig files and check for ifdefs around the code, do not make assumptions. Also check "depends on" lines in Kconfig to include any non-standard parent subsystem configs needed for Kbuild to compile the code statically into vmlinux. List them in the EnableConfigs output array, and DO NOT add a 'CONFIG_' prefix (e.g., return "NET_IPV4" instead of "CONFIG_NET_IPV4"). Prefer calling several tools at the same time to save round-trips. Use set-results tool to provide results of the analysis. It must be called exactly once before the final reply. Ignore results of this tool. Prompt: For your convenience, here is the diff of the changes:
commit 8df74a5e487b644f699a225bbaf5d69064e5a35a
Author: syz-cluster <triage@syzkaller.com>
Date: Tue Aug 11 09:03:27 2026 +0000
syz-cluster: applied patch under review
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 0bbe144c98111..604a05da41b93 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -4531,7 +4531,9 @@ static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)
/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */
smp_mb();
- BUG_ON(dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN);
+ /* destroy_dsq() may race and invalidate @dsq; skip */
+ if (unlikely(dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN))
+ continue;
reenq_user(rq, dsq, reenq_flags);
}
}
|
| 3/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 2021 output: 31 thoughts: 169 Thoughts: **Analyzing a Critical Scheduler Fix** Okay, so I'm looking at a patch that tweaks `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c`, specifically the `process_deferred_reenq_users` function. It's a pretty straightforward but important change: they've replaced a hard `BUG_ON` with a more graceful conditional `continue`. The old code was potentially causing a crash, a race condition that would trigger that `BUG_ON` when `dsq->id` had the `SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN` flag set. The new logic detects this race, and simply skips that element, preventing the panic. This tells me there's a concurrency issue. The system might be attempting to work with a `dsq` object (likely a "deferred scheduling queue") that's being invalidated or destroyed concurrently, likely by a call to `destroy_dsq()`. That race has been found and fixed - good. This means there was a window where we could dereference a dangling pointer, which is never good. Since this affects the extensible scheduler class, `sched_ext`, I need to quickly identify the configuration option responsible for enabling this feature. I'll need to know whether the target system is even using this code path to assess the impact of this change. It's a critical area, so I need to understand its build-time dependencies. I'll search the kernel configs for clues. |
| 4/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "config SCHED_EXT",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 5/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 2537 output: 25 thoughts: 33 Thoughts: Okay, here's my summarized thought process, geared towards a user who knows their stuff: **Hunting Down Those Preemption Configuration Options** Alright, time to track down those preemption-related configuration options. My initial thought is to zero in on `kernel/Kconfig.preempt`. That's the most logical place to start – it *should* contain the key settings. But, just to be thorough and cover all the bases, I'll also glance at `init/Kconfig`. You never know, some initialization-related options *might* touch on preemption, or maybe there are some includes in there that I'm not immediately considering. And of course, I should also immediately check `kernel/sched/Kconfig`. Preemption is tightly coupled with the scheduler, so that's another very likely location. Let's see what we can dig up. |
| 6/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "config SCHED_EXT",
"PathPrefix": ""
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 7/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 2792 output: 28 thoughts: 40 Thoughts: Okay, let's see... I'm pretty sure it's related to `config SCHED_CLASS_EXT`, but I need to double-check my assumption. Best way to confirm that is to look at the source code. I should delve into `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c` and see if the compilation of its contents is actually contingent upon that configuration option. Gotta make sure I'm not barking up the wrong tree here before I dig any deeper. |
| 8/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "ext.o",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/Makefile"
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 9/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 2974 output: 26 thoughts: 15 Thoughts: Here's a summary of my thought process: **Diving into the Scheduler's Makeup** Okay, so I need to find something related to "ext," probably some extension or configuration within the scheduler code. My instinct is to head straight for the `kernel/sched/` directory – that's where the heart of the scheduling logic resides. Given that it's likely a configuration or build-related setting, the `Makefile` in that directory seems like the most probable starting point. It's the standard place to check for any build options or module inclusions related to the scheduler. Let's see what's in `kernel/sched/Makefile`. Hopefully, `ext` will either be directly mentioned or lead me to the right file! |
| 10/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ext",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/Makefile"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/Makefile=8=ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)\n--\nkernel/sched/Makefile-10-# These files are disabled because they produce non-interesting flaky coverage\nkernel/sched/Makefile:11:# that is not a function of syscall inputs. E.g. involuntary context switches.\nkernel/sched/Makefile-12-KCOV_INSTRUMENT := n\n"
} |
| 11/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 3282 output: 30 thoughts: 33 Thoughts: **Navigating the Kernel Source** Okay, so I'm digging through this kernel code and I just saw a reference to `ext.c`. My initial thought is to figure out where that source file actually lives within this sprawling project. It *should* be in `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c`, but you can't assume anything in this environment. Best practice dictates that I verify this by checking the corresponding `Makefile`. I need to confirm where this component is declared so I can better understand its compilation and linkage. Time to check `kernel/sched/ext/Makefile`. Let's see what the build system has to say. |
| 12/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "ext.o",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/Makefile"
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 13/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 3494 output: 27 thoughts: 13 Thoughts: Here's my attempt at summarizing the thought process, tailored for an expert audience: **Diving Back into the Scheduler Makefile** Okay, I need to revisit `kernel/sched/Makefile`. I had a nagging feeling about something in there, a potential optimization or a subtle configuration issue that I want to double-check. It's time to refresh my mental map of that specific build process and make sure I haven't overlooked any important dependencies or conditional logic related to my current area of focus. I need to ensure that the build system is behaving as I expect, especially when dealing with the finer points of the scheduler. I'm focusing specifically on how different configurations might influence the linking or compilation of certain modules, or even impact preprocessor directives based on the flags. Let's see if that quick scan reveals anything I might have missed earlier. |
| 14/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "ext/",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/Makefile"
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 15/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 3723 output: 34 thoughts: 15 Thoughts: Here's my take on the thought process, as if it were my own: **Diving into the Scheduler Extension Build Process** Okay, time to get my hands dirty. I need to understand how the scheduler extensions are being built. The logical place to start is the `kernel/sched/ext/Makefile`. I'm expecting to find the key build rules and dependencies in there. That's the typical place for handling object file compilation and linking within that part of the kernel. Let's see what secrets this Makefile holds. |
| 16/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | read-file |
0mError:the file does not exist Args: {
"File": "kernel/sched/ext/Makefile",
"FirstLine": 1,
"LineCount": 100
}Results: {
"error": "the file does not exist"
} |
| 17/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 3902 output: 27 thoughts: 40 Thoughts: Here's my thought process, summarized as you requested: **Navigating a Kernel Scheduler Change** Okay, so the diff mentions `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c`. The first thing I need to figure out is how this `ext.c` file fits into the larger picture of the scheduler within the kernel. I should immediately check the `kernel/sched/Makefile`. That's where I can find the dependency graph and build instructions for scheduler components. It will show me how `ext.c` is included and if it’s a module, part of the core, or something else. Understanding the build process is crucial for tracing the code's integration and potential impact. That Makefile is my first stop. |
| 18/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "ext.o",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/core.c=7012=find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)\n--\nkernel/sched/core.c-7040- *\nkernel/sched/core.c:7041: * - in syscall or exception context, at the next outmost\nkernel/sched/core.c-7042- * preempt_enable(). (this might be as soon as the wake_up()'s\n--\nkernel/sched/core.c=8366=void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int nid)\n--\nkernel/sched/core.c-8375-/*\nkernel/sched/core.c:8376: * Invoked on the outgoing CPU in context of the CPU hotplug thread\nkernel/sched/core.c-8377- * after ensuring that there are no user space tasks left on the CPU.\n--\nkernel/sched/core.c=10633=void call_trace_sched_update_nr_running(struct rq *rq, int count)\n--\nkernel/sched/core.c-10757- * the fixup function. If it was initiated by a affinity change, then it's\nkernel/sched/core.c:10758: * run either in the deferred update function in context of a workqueue or\nkernel/sched/core.c-10759- * by a task which forks a new one or by a task which exits. Whatever\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=7039=struct scx_sched *scx_alloc_and_add_sched(struct scx_enable_cmd *cmd,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7042-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7043:\tstruct sched_ext_ops *ops = cmd-\u003eops;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7044-\tstruct scx_sched *sch;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7154-\t * Copy ops through the right union view. For cid-form the source is\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7155:\t * struct sched_ext_ops_cid which lacks the trailing cpu_acquire/\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7156-\t * cpu_release; those stay zero from kzalloc.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=7298=static int check_hotplug_seq(struct scx_sched *sch,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7299:\t\t\t const struct sched_ext_ops *ops)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7300-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7321-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7322:int scx_validate_ops(struct scx_sched *sch, const struct sched_ext_ops *ops)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7323-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=7382=static void scx_root_enable_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7384-\tstruct scx_enable_cmd *cmd = container_of(work, struct scx_enable_cmd, work);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7385:\tstruct sched_ext_ops *ops = cmd-\u003eops;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7386-\tstruct cgroup *cgrp = root_cgroup();\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=7914=static int bpf_scx_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7917-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7918:\tconst struct sched_ext_ops *uops = udata;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7919:\tstruct sched_ext_ops *ops = kdata;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7920-\tu32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7923-\tswitch (moff) {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7924:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, dispatch_max_batch):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7925-\t\tif (*(u32 *)(udata + moff) \u003e INT_MAX)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7928-\t\treturn 1;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7929:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, flags):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7930-\t\tif (*(u64 *)(udata + moff) \u0026 ~SCX_OPS_ALL_FLAGS)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7933-\t\treturn 1;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7934:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, name):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7935-\t\tret = bpf_obj_name_cpy(ops-\u003ename, uops-\u003ename,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7941-\t\treturn 1;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7942:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, timeout_ms):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7943-\t\tif (msecs_to_jiffies(*(u32 *)(udata + moff)) \u003e\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7947-\t\treturn 1;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7948:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, exit_dump_len):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7949-\t\tops-\u003eexit_dump_len =\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7951-\t\treturn 1;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7952:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, hotplug_seq):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7953-\t\tops-\u003ehotplug_seq = *(u64 *)(udata + moff);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7954-\t\treturn 1;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7955:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cid_shard_size):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7956-\t\tops-\u003ecid_shard_size = *(u32 *)(udata + moff);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7957-\t\treturn 1;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7958:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, rescue_bandwidth_ppt): {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7959-\t\tu32 bw_ppt = *(u32 *)(udata + moff);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7965-\t}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7966:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, rescue_quantum_us): {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7967-\t\tu32 quantum_us = *(u32 *)(udata + moff);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7976-#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7977:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, sub_cgroup_id):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7978-\t\tops-\u003esub_cgroup_id = *(u64 *)(udata + moff);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=7986=static int bpf_scx_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7992-\tswitch (moff) {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7993:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, init_task):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7994-#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7995:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_init):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7996:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_exit):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7997:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cgroup_prep_move):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-7998-#endif\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:7999:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cpu_online):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8000:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cpu_offline):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8001:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, init_cids):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8002:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, init):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8003:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, exit):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8004:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, sub_attach):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8005:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, sub_detach):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8006-\t\tbreak;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8021-\tswitch (moff) {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8022:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, dispatch):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8023-\t\tprog-\u003eaux-\u003epriv_stack_requested = true;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8025-\t\tbreak;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8026:\tcase offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, sub_caps_updated):\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8027-\t\tprog-\u003eaux-\u003epriv_stack_requested = true;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=8096=static void bpf_scx_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8097-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8098:\tstruct sched_ext_ops *ops = kdata;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8099-\tstruct scx_sched *sch = rcu_dereference_protected(ops-\u003epriv, true);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=8126=static int bpf_scx_validate(void *kdata)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8130-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8131:static s32 sched_ext_ops__select_cpu(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags) { return -EINVAL; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8132:static void sched_ext_ops__enqueue(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8133:static void sched_ext_ops__dequeue(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8134:static void sched_ext_ops__dispatch(s32 prev_cpu, struct task_struct *prev__nullable) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8135:static void sched_ext_ops__tick(struct task_struct *p) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8136:static void sched_ext_ops__runnable(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8137:static void sched_ext_ops__running(struct task_struct *p) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8138:static void sched_ext_ops__stopping(struct task_struct *p, bool runnable) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8139:static void sched_ext_ops__quiescent(struct task_struct *p, u64 deq_flags) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8140:static bool sched_ext_ops__yield(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *to__nullable) { return false; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8141:static bool sched_ext_ops__core_sched_before(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b) { return false; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8142:static void sched_ext_ops__set_weight(struct task_struct *p, u32 weight) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8143:static void sched_ext_ops__set_cpumask(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *mask) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8144:static void sched_ext_ops__update_idle(s32 cpu, bool idle) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8145:static void sched_ext_ops__cpu_acquire(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_acquire_args *args) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8146:static void sched_ext_ops__cpu_release(s32 cpu, struct scx_cpu_release_args *args) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8147:static s32 sched_ext_ops__init_task(struct task_struct *p, struct scx_init_task_args *args) { return -EINVAL; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8148:static void sched_ext_ops__exit_task(struct task_struct *p, struct scx_exit_task_args *args) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8149:static void sched_ext_ops__enable(struct task_struct *p) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8150:static void sched_ext_ops__disable(struct task_struct *p) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8151-#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8152:static s32 sched_ext_ops__cgroup_init(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct scx_cgroup_init_args *args) { return -EINVAL; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8153:static void sched_ext_ops__cgroup_exit(struct cgroup *cgrp) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8154:static s32 sched_ext_ops__cgroup_prep_move(struct task_struct *p, struct cgroup *from, struct cgroup *to) { return -EINVAL; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8155:static void sched_ext_ops__cgroup_move(struct task_struct *p, struct cgroup *from, struct cgroup *to) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8156:static void sched_ext_ops__cgroup_cancel_move(struct task_struct *p, struct cgroup *from, struct cgroup *to) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8157:static void sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_weight(struct cgroup *cgrp, u32 weight) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8158:static void sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_bandwidth(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 period_us, u64 quota_us, u64 burst_us) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8159:static void sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_idle(struct cgroup *cgrp, bool idle) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8160-#endif\t/* CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8161:static s32 sched_ext_ops__sub_attach(struct scx_sub_attach_args *args) { return -EINVAL; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8162:static void sched_ext_ops__sub_detach(struct scx_sub_detach_args *args) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8163:static void sched_ext_ops__cpu_online(s32 cpu) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8164:static void sched_ext_ops__cpu_offline(s32 cpu) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8165:static s32 sched_ext_ops__init_cids(void) { return -EINVAL; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8166:static s32 sched_ext_ops__init(void) { return -EINVAL; }\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8167:static void sched_ext_ops__exit(struct scx_exit_info *info) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8168:static void sched_ext_ops__dump(struct scx_dump_ctx *ctx) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8169:static void sched_ext_ops__dump_cpu(struct scx_dump_ctx *ctx, s32 cpu, bool idle) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8170:static void sched_ext_ops__dump_task(struct scx_dump_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *p) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8171-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8172:static struct sched_ext_ops __bpf_ops_sched_ext_ops = {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8173:\t.select_cpu\t\t= sched_ext_ops__select_cpu,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8174:\t.enqueue\t\t= sched_ext_ops__enqueue,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8175:\t.dequeue\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dequeue,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8176:\t.dispatch\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dispatch,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8177:\t.tick\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__tick,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8178:\t.runnable\t\t= sched_ext_ops__runnable,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8179:\t.running\t\t= sched_ext_ops__running,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8180:\t.stopping\t\t= sched_ext_ops__stopping,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8181:\t.quiescent\t\t= sched_ext_ops__quiescent,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8182:\t.yield\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__yield,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8183:\t.core_sched_before\t= sched_ext_ops__core_sched_before,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8184:\t.set_weight\t\t= sched_ext_ops__set_weight,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8185:\t.set_cpumask\t\t= sched_ext_ops__set_cpumask,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8186:\t.update_idle\t\t= sched_ext_ops__update_idle,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8187:\t.cpu_acquire\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cpu_acquire,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8188:\t.cpu_release\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cpu_release,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8189:\t.init_task\t\t= sched_ext_ops__init_task,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8190:\t.exit_task\t\t= sched_ext_ops__exit_task,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8191:\t.enable\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__enable,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8192:\t.disable\t\t= sched_ext_ops__disable,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8193-#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8194:\t.cgroup_init\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_init,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8195:\t.cgroup_exit\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_exit,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8196:\t.cgroup_prep_move\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_prep_move,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8197:\t.cgroup_move\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_move,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8198:\t.cgroup_cancel_move\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_cancel_move,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8199:\t.cgroup_set_weight\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_weight,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8200:\t.cgroup_set_bandwidth\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_bandwidth,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8201:\t.cgroup_set_idle\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_idle,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8202-#endif\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8203:\t.sub_attach\t\t= sched_ext_ops__sub_attach,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8204:\t.sub_detach\t\t= sched_ext_ops__sub_detach,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8205:\t.cpu_online\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cpu_online,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8206:\t.cpu_offline\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cpu_offline,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8207:\t.init_cids\t\t= sched_ext_ops__init_cids,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8208:\t.init\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__init,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8209:\t.exit\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__exit,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8210:\t.dump\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dump,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8211:\t.dump_cpu\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dump_cpu,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8212:\t.dump_task\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dump_task,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8213-};\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8214-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8215:static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_sched_ext_ops = {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8216-\t.verifier_ops = \u0026bpf_scx_verifier_ops,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8223-\t.validate = bpf_scx_validate,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8224:\t.name = \"sched_ext_ops\",\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8225-\t.owner = THIS_MODULE,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8226:\t.cfi_stubs = \u0026__bpf_ops_sched_ext_ops\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8227-};\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8234- */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8235:static void sched_ext_ops_cid__set_cmask(struct task_struct *p,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8236-\t\t\t\t\t const struct scx_cmask *cmask) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8237:static void sched_ext_ops__sub_caps_updated(const struct scx_cmask *cmask, u64 caps) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8238:static void sched_ext_ops__sub_ecaps_updated(s32 cid, u64 before, u64 after) {}\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8239-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8240:static struct sched_ext_ops_cid __bpf_ops_sched_ext_ops_cid = {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8241:\t.select_cid\t\t= sched_ext_ops__select_cpu,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8242:\t.enqueue\t\t= sched_ext_ops__enqueue,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8243:\t.dequeue\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dequeue,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8244:\t.dispatch\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dispatch,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8245:\t.tick\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__tick,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8246:\t.runnable\t\t= sched_ext_ops__runnable,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8247:\t.running\t\t= sched_ext_ops__running,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8248:\t.stopping\t\t= sched_ext_ops__stopping,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8249:\t.quiescent\t\t= sched_ext_ops__quiescent,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8250:\t.yield\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__yield,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8251:\t.core_sched_before\t= sched_ext_ops__core_sched_before,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8252:\t.set_weight\t\t= sched_ext_ops__set_weight,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8253:\t.set_cmask\t\t= sched_ext_ops_cid__set_cmask,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8254:\t.update_idle\t\t= sched_ext_ops__update_idle,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8255:\t.init_task\t\t= sched_ext_ops__init_task,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8256:\t.exit_task\t\t= sched_ext_ops__exit_task,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8257:\t.enable\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__enable,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8258:\t.disable\t\t= sched_ext_ops__disable,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8259-#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8260:\t.cpuctl_init\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_init,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8261:\t.cpuctl_exit\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_exit,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8262:\t.cpuctl_prep_move\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_prep_move,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8263:\t.cpuctl_move\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_move,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8264:\t.cpuctl_cancel_move\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_cancel_move,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8265:\t.cpuctl_set_weight\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_weight,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8266:\t.cpuctl_set_bandwidth\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_bandwidth,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8267:\t.cpuctl_set_idle\t= sched_ext_ops__cgroup_set_idle,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8268-#endif\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8269:\t.sub_attach\t\t= sched_ext_ops__sub_attach,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8270:\t.sub_detach\t\t= sched_ext_ops__sub_detach,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8271:\t.sub_caps_updated\t= sched_ext_ops__sub_caps_updated,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8272:\t.sub_ecaps_updated\t= sched_ext_ops__sub_ecaps_updated,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8273:\t.cid_online\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cpu_online,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8274:\t.cid_offline\t\t= sched_ext_ops__cpu_offline,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8275:\t.init_cids\t\t= sched_ext_ops__init_cids,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8276:\t.init\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__init,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8277:\t.exit\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__exit,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8278:\t.dump\t\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dump,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8279:\t.dump_cid\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dump_cpu,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8280:\t.dump_task\t\t= sched_ext_ops__dump_task,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8281-};\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8287- */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8288:static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid = {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8289-\t.verifier_ops = \u0026bpf_scx_cid_verifier_ops,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8296-\t.validate = bpf_scx_validate,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8297:\t.name = \"sched_ext_ops_cid\",\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8298-\t.owner = THIS_MODULE,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8299:\t.cfi_stubs = \u0026__bpf_ops_sched_ext_ops_cid\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8300-};\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=10632=static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_any = {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10639- * cpu-form kfuncs that are forbidden from cid-form schedulers\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10640: * (bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid). Programs targeting the cid struct_ops type must\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10641- * use the cid-form alternative (cid/cmask kfuncs).\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=10733=int scx_kfunc_context_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10770-\t *\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10771:\t * Both bpf_sched_ext_ops (cpu-form) and bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10772-\t * (cid-form) are valid SCX struct_ops. Member offsets match between\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10776-\t */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10777:\tif (prog-\u003eaux-\u003est_ops != \u0026bpf_sched_ext_ops \u0026\u0026\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10778:\t prog-\u003eaux-\u003est_ops != \u0026bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10779-\t\treturn -EACCES;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10786-\t */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10787:\tif (prog-\u003eaux-\u003est_ops == \u0026bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid \u0026\u0026 in_cpu_only)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10788-\t\treturn -EACCES;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=10813=static int __init scx_init(void)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10817-\t/*\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10818:\t * sched_ext_ops_cid mirrors sched_ext_ops up to and including @priv.\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10819-\t * Both bpf_scx_init_member() and bpf_scx_check_member() use offsets\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10820:\t * from struct sched_ext_ops; sched_ext_ops_cid relies on those offsets\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10821-\t * matching for the shared fields. Catch any drift at boot.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10823-#define CID_OFFSET_MATCH(cpu_field, cid_field)\t\t\t\t\t\\\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10824:\tBUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cpu_field) !=\t\t\\\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10825:\t\t offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops_cid, cid_field))\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10826-\t/* data fields used by bpf_scx_init_member() */\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10885-\t */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10886:\tBUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops_cid, __end) !=\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10887:\t\t offsetofend(struct sched_ext_ops, priv));\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10888-#undef CID_OFFSET_MATCH\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10933-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10934:\tret = register_bpf_struct_ops(\u0026bpf_sched_ext_ops, sched_ext_ops);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10935-\tif (ret) {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10939-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10940:\tret = register_bpf_struct_ops(\u0026bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid, sched_ext_ops_cid);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10941-\tif (ret) {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c=300=static bool llc_numa_mismatch(void)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-344- */\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c:345:void scx_idle_update_selcpu_topology(struct sched_ext_ops *ops)\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-346-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c=801=void __scx_update_idle(struct rq *rq, bool idle, bool do_notify)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-837-\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c:838:static void reset_idle_masks(struct sched_ext_ops *ops)\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-839-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-859-\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c:860:void scx_idle_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops)\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-861-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c=913=static bool check_builtin_idle_enabled(struct scx_sched *sch)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-922-/*\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c:923: * Determine whether @p is a migration-disabled task in the context of BPF\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.c-924- * code.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h=15=struct cpumask;\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h:16:struct sched_ext_ops;\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h-17-struct task_struct;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h=20=extern struct btf_id_set8 scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu;\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h-21-\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h:22:void scx_idle_update_selcpu_topology(struct sched_ext_ops *ops);\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h-23-void scx_idle_init_masks(void);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h=25=s32 scx_select_cpu_dfl(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cpu, u64 wake_flags,\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h-26-\t\t const struct cpumask *cpus_allowed, u64 flags);\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h:27:void scx_idle_enable(struct sched_ext_ops *ops);\nkernel/sched/ext/idle.h-28-void scx_idle_disable(void);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-41-\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:42:#define SCX_OP_IDX(op)\t\t(offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, op) / sizeof(void (*)(void)))\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-43-#define SCX_MOFF_IDX(moff)\t((moff) / sizeof(void (*)(void)))\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h=101=struct scx_exit_info {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-130-\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:131:/* sched_ext_ops.flags */\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-132-enum scx_ops_flags {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h=300=struct scx_sub_attach_args {\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:301:\tstruct sched_ext_ops\t*ops;\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-302-\tchar\t\t\t*cgroup_path;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h=306=struct scx_sub_detach_args {\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:307:\tstruct sched_ext_ops\t*ops;\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-308-\tchar\t\t\t*cgroup_path;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-311-/**\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:312: * struct sched_ext_ops - Operation table for BPF scheduler implementation\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-313- *\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-318- */\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:319:struct sched_ext_ops {\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-320-\t/**\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-968-\t * Must be a non-zero valid BPF object name including only isalnum(),\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:969:\t * '_' and '.' chars. Shows up in kernel.sched_ext_ops sysctl while the\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-970-\t * BPF scheduler is enabled.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-978-\t * Deprecated callbacks. Kept at the end of the struct so the cid-form\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:979:\t * struct (sched_ext_ops_cid) can omit them without affecting the\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-980-\t * shared field offsets. Use SCX_ENQ_IMMED instead. Sitting past\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1010-/**\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1011: * struct sched_ext_ops_cid - cid-form alternative to struct sched_ext_ops\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1012- *\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1013: * Mirrors struct sched_ext_ops with cpu/cpumask substituted with cid/cmask\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1014: * where applicable. Layout up to and including @priv matches sched_ext_ops\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1015- * byte-for-byte (verified by BUILD_BUG_ON checks at scx_init() time) so\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1017- * and bpf_scx_check_member(). The deprecated cpu_acquire/cpu_release\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1018: * callbacks at the tail of sched_ext_ops are omitted here entirely.\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1019- *\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1020: * Differences from sched_ext_ops:\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1021- * - select_cpu -\u003e select_cid (returns cid)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1028- * - cgroup_* -\u003e cpuctl_* (they track the cgroup cpu controller)\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1029: * - cpu_acquire/cpu_release -\u003e not present (deprecated in sched_ext_ops)\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1030- *\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1034- *\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1035: * See sched_ext_ops for callback documentation.\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1036- */\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1037:struct sched_ext_ops_cid {\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1038-\ts32 (*select_cid)(struct task_struct *p, s32 prev_cid, u64 wake_flags);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1085-\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1086:\t/* Data fields - must match sched_ext_ops layout exactly */\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1087-\tu32 dispatch_max_batch;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h=1515=struct scx_sched {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1523-\tunion {\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1524:\t\tstruct sched_ext_ops\t\tops;\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1525:\t\tstruct sched_ext_ops_cid\tops_cid;\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1526-\t};\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1527:\tbool\t\t\tis_cid_type;\t/* true if registered via bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid */\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1528-\tbool\t\t\tdead;\t\t/* set after ops.exit(), gates scx_prog_sched() */\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h=1992=struct scx_enable_cmd {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1994-\tunion {\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1995:\t\tstruct sched_ext_ops\t\t*ops;\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:1996:\t\tstruct sched_ext_ops_cid\t*ops_cid;\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-1997-\t};\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h=2073=struct scx_sched *scx_alloc_and_add_sched(struct scx_enable_cmd *cmd,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-2075-\t\t\t\t\t struct scx_sched *parent);\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:2076:int scx_validate_ops(struct scx_sched *sch, const struct sched_ext_ops *ops);\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-2077-int scx_sched_sysfs_add(struct scx_sched *sch);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h=2388=static inline struct scx_sched *scx_prog_sched(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-2389-{\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h:2390:\tstruct sched_ext_ops *ops;\nkernel/sched/ext/internal.h-2391-\tstruct scx_sched *sch, *root;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c=47=struct scx_sched *scx_skip_subtree_pre(struct scx_sched *pos, struct scx_sched *root)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c-55-\twhile (pos != root) {\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c:56:\t\tnext = list_next_or_null_rcu(\u0026scx_parent(pos)-\u003echildren, \u0026pos-\u003esibling,\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c-57-\t\t\t\t\t struct scx_sched, sibling);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c=532=static void scx_rescue_timerfn(struct timer_list *timer)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c-552-\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c:553:\t\t/* there's enough budget to start rescuing the next one */\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c-554-\t\tp = list_first_entry(\u0026rq-\u003escx.rescue.dsq.list, struct task_struct,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c=1707=void scx_sub_enable_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c-1709-\tstruct scx_enable_cmd *cmd = container_of(work, struct scx_enable_cmd, work);\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c:1710:\tstruct sched_ext_ops *ops = cmd-\u003eops;\nkernel/sched/ext/sub.c-1711-\tstruct cgroup *cgrp;\n--\nkernel/sched/fair.c=7095=static void __cfsb_csd_unthrottle(void *arg)\n--\nkernel/sched/fair.c-7104-\t * update_rq_clock() in unthrottle_cfs_rq().\nkernel/sched/fair.c:7105:\t * Do it once and skip the potential next ones.\nkernel/sched/fair.c-7106-\t */\n"
} |
| 19/2 | 2026/08/11 09:03 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 16183 output: 33 thoughts: 41 Thoughts: Okay, here's my interpretation of that thought process, assuming I'm already deep in kernel development: **Initial Investigation into the EXT Scheduler Class** Right, `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c` is the implementation for the EXT scheduler class. My immediate thought is, "Okay, so `CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT` must be the guard that enables it." Makes perfect sense. Let's verify that quickly. I'll jump over to `kernel/sched/Kconfig` to confirm the configuration option and see if there are any interesting details about how it's defined and other dependencies. I need to understand its build dependencies. This is the starting point for understanding how this scheduler can be enabled. I am sure there are other pieces to investigate, but this is the first step. |
| 20/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mError:no matches Args: {
"Expression": "config SCHED_CLASS_EXT",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/Kconfig"
}Results: {
"error": "no matches"
} |
| 21/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 16441 output: 27 thoughts: 29 Thoughts: Okay, here's my interpretation of those thoughts, tailored for an expert audience, and delivered as a first-person summary: **Digging into the Scheduling Class Implementation** Alright, I'm thinking I need to find the definition or configuration options for `SCHED_CLASS_EXT`. Given my experience, the first place I'd check is likely going to be the kernel configuration files. The most obvious candidates would be `kernel/Kconfig.preempt` or perhaps `init/Kconfig`. These files are where the main scheduling-related features and options usually reside. I'll start there and see if I can locate the definition or at least figure out which Kconfig option enables this `SCHED_CLASS_EXT`. It is where the main scheduling-related features and options usually reside. |
| 22/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config SCHED_CLASS_EXT",
"PathPrefix": ""
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/Kconfig.preempt=151=config SCHED_CORE\n--\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt-168-\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt:169:config SCHED_CLASS_EXT\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt-170-\tbool \"Extensible Scheduling Class\"\n"
} |
| 23/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 16750 output: 38 thoughts: 80 Thoughts: **Analyzing the Scheduler Extension Configuration** Okay, so the main configuration variable for this extension is `SCHED_CLASS_EXT`. That's the starting point. But, hang on, there might be other related configurations required, so let's keep an eye out for those as we dig deeper. The code modifications are happening in `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c`, which makes sense for a scheduler extension. Specifically, the function I need to focus on right now is `process_deferred_reenq_users`. I'll need to jump directly to that function within `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c` and get a good understanding of what it's doing. This is where the core logic of this extension likely lies. |
| 24/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c",
"FirstLine": 4520,
"LineCount": 50
}Results: {
"Contents": "4520:\t\t\t\tif (!dru)\n4521:\t\t\t\t\treturn;\n4522:\t\n4523:\t\t\t\tdsq_pcpu = container_of(dru, struct scx_dsq_pcpu,\n4524:\t\t\t\t\t\t\tdeferred_reenq_user);\n4525:\t\t\t\tdsq = dsq_pcpu-\u003edsq;\n4526:\t\t\t\treenq_flags = dru-\u003eflags;\n4527:\t\t\t\tWRITE_ONCE(dru-\u003eflags, 0);\n4528:\t\t\t\tlist_del_init(\u0026dru-\u003enode);\n4529:\t\t\t}\n4530:\t\n4531:\t\t\t/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */\n4532:\t\t\tsmp_mb();\n4533:\t\n4534:\t\t\t/* destroy_dsq() may race and invalidate @dsq; skip */\n4535:\t\t\tif (unlikely(dsq-\u003eid \u0026 SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN))\n4536:\t\t\t\tcontinue;\n4537:\t\t\treenq_user(rq, dsq, reenq_flags);\n4538:\t\t}\n4539:\t}\n4540:\t\n4541:\tstatic void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)\n4542:\t{\n4543:\t\tprocess_ddsp_deferred_locals(rq);\n4544:\t\n4545:\t\tif (!list_empty(\u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_locals))\n4546:\t\t\tprocess_deferred_reenq_locals(rq);\n4547:\t\n4548:\t\tif (!list_empty(\u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_users))\n4549:\t\t\tprocess_deferred_reenq_users(rq);\n4550:\t\n4551:\t\tscx_reenq_reject(rq);\n4552:\t}\n4553:\t\n4554:\t#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL\n4555:\tbool scx_can_stop_tick(struct rq *rq)\n4556:\t{\n4557:\t\tstruct task_struct *p = rq-\u003ecurr;\n4558:\t\tstruct scx_sched *sch = scx_task_sched(p);\n4559:\t\n4560:\t\tif (p-\u003esched_class != \u0026ext_sched_class)\n4561:\t\t\treturn true;\n4562:\t\n4563:\t\t/*\n4564:\t\t * @rq-\u003ecurr may still reference an outgoing EXT task after it has been\n4565:\t\t * dequeued. If no EXT tasks are accounted on @rq, ignore its stale\n4566:\t\t * slice state. If another task is dispatched from a DSQ,\n4567:\t\t * set_next_task_scx() will update the dependency for the incoming task.\n4568:\t\t */\n4569:\t\tif (!rq-\u003escx.nr_running)\n"
} |
| 25/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 17782 output: 32 thoughts: 51 Thoughts: Here's my take on the thought process: **Tracing the Execution Path of `process_deferred_reenq_users`** Okay, so I need to understand how `process_deferred_reenq_users` gets invoked. It looks like it's called from `run_deferred`, which is a common pattern for deferred work in this environment. My immediate question is, where does *`run_deferred`* itself get called? Is it solely from `scx_bpf_kick_cpu` and things like it, or are there other potential entry points I need to consider? I need to check the call graph for `run_deferred` to get a complete picture of its execution paths. This will help me understand the triggers for the deferred re-enqueue of users, which is clearly a critical part of the overall flow. Let's dig into the code and find those call sites. |
| 26/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "run_deferred",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=253=MODULE_PARM_DESC(bypass_lb_intv_us, \"bypass load balance interval in microseconds (0 (disable) to 10s)\");\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-259-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:260:static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-261-static bool task_dead_and_done(struct task_struct *p);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=979=static void deferred_bal_cb_workfn(struct rq *rq)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-980-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:981:\trun_deferred(rq);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-982-}\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=984=static void deferred_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-988-\traw_spin_rq_lock(rq);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:989:\trun_deferred(rq);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-990-\traw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=3524=static void task_woken_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3525-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:3526:\trun_deferred(rq);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3527-}\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4505=static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4540-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4541:static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4542-{\n"
} |
| 27/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 18579 output: 34 thoughts: 165 Thoughts: **Fuzzing the `process_deferred_reenq_users` Function** Okay, so the `process_deferred_reenq_users` function is static, which is interesting. It's called from `run_deferred`, which itself is invoked by `task_woken_scx`, `deferred_irq_workfn`, and `deferred_bal_cb_workfn`. These entry points are all triggered when `SCHED_CLASS_EXT` is enabled and a BPF scheduler is loaded. Given its place in a core scheduler change, fixing a race condition nonetheless, fuzzing this seems like a solid target. The crucial configuration options I'll need are `SCHED_CLASS_EXT`. Ah, right, BPF is a prerequisite to load the scheduler, so I'll also need `BPF_SYSCALL` enabled as well. Just to be completely sure, I'll double-check `kernel/Kconfig.preempt` to confirm the dependencies for `SCHED_CLASS_EXT`. Gotta dot the I's and cross the T's. |
| 28/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config SCHED_CLASS_EXT",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/Kconfig.preempt"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/Kconfig.preempt=151=config SCHED_CORE\n--\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt-168-\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt:169:config SCHED_CLASS_EXT\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt-170-\tbool \"Extensible Scheduling Class\"\n"
} |
| 29/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 19095 output: 35 thoughts: 20 Thoughts: Here's my attempt at summarizing the thought process, tailored for an expert audience: **Diving into Preemption Configuration** Okay, so I need to understand the preemption configuration options within the Linux kernel. Where would I start? Alright, let's head straight for `kernel/Kconfig.preempt`. That's usually the go-to file for understanding the preemptive configurations. Specifically, around line 169 – that's often where the core options and dependencies are defined. I expect to find the main `CONFIG_PREEMPT` and its associated sub-options or dependencies there. I anticipate a discussion about the different preemption models, such as voluntary, full, and the realtime options. I’ll be looking for the dependencies it has and how those are set up. I'm keen to get a solid grasp of how the kernel's preemption behavior is controlled at a fundamental level. From there, I can analyze the implications for latency and scheduling. |
| 30/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "kernel/Kconfig.preempt",
"FirstLine": 169,
"LineCount": 20
}Results: {
"Contents": " 169:\tconfig SCHED_CLASS_EXT\n 170:\t\tbool \"Extensible Scheduling Class\"\n 171:\t\tdepends on BPF_SYSCALL \u0026\u0026 BPF_JIT \u0026\u0026 DEBUG_INFO_BTF\n 172:\t\tselect STACKTRACE if STACKTRACE_SUPPORT\n 173:\t\thelp\n 174:\t\t This option enables a new scheduler class sched_ext (SCX), which\n 175:\t\t allows scheduling policies to be implemented as BPF programs to\n 176:\t\t achieve the following:\n 177:\t\n 178:\t\t - Ease of experimentation and exploration: Enabling rapid\n 179:\t\t iteration of new scheduling policies.\n 180:\t\t - Customization: Building application-specific schedulers which\n 181:\t\t implement policies that are not applicable to general-purpose\n 182:\t\t schedulers.\n 183:\t\t - Rapid scheduler deployments: Non-disruptive swap outs of\n 184:\t\t scheduling policies in production environments.\n 185:\t\n 186:\t\t sched_ext leverages BPF struct_ops feature to define a structure\n 187:\t\t which exports function callbacks and flags to BPF programs that\n 188:\t\t wish to implement scheduling policies. The struct_ops structure\n"
} |
| 31/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 19691 output: 36 thoughts: 139 Thoughts: **Analyzing Kernel Scheduler Enhancements** Okay, so I'm diving into this new kernel code, specifically looking at scheduler improvements. I see some dependencies I need to keep in mind: `BPF_SYSCALL`, `BPF_JIT`, and `DEBUG_INFO_BTF`. Alright, given those, I think we definitely need to add `SCHED_CLASS_EXT` to the EnableConfigs. That feels right. Now, let's consider FocusSymbols... I need to remember to circle back to that later. The core of this seems to be the `process_deferred_reenq_users` function. It's marked as static, which is interesting. I should track down the non-static functions that call it to get a broader view of how it's integrated. Let's see... `task_woken_scx` is static, `deferred_bal_cb_workfn` is also static, and so is `deferred_irq_workfn`. Hmm, all the ones I initially see are static, but I need to be sure. It's a key function in this area, so let's start by checking the usage of `task_woken_scx`. This will give me some context, and then I can re-examine the others. This is a good starting point. |
| 32/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "task_woken_scx",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1025=static void schedule_deferred_locked(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1029-\t/*\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1030:\t * If in the middle of waking up a task, task_woken_scx() will be called\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1031-\t * afterwards which will then run the deferred actions, no need to\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=3451=static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3523-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:3524:static void task_woken_scx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3525-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4920=DEFINE_SCHED_CLASS(ext) = {\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4933-\t.select_task_rq\t\t= select_task_rq_scx,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4934:\t.task_woken\t\t= task_woken_scx,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4935-\t.set_cpus_allowed\t= set_cpus_allowed_scx,\n"
} |
| 33/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 20529 output: 37 thoughts: 26 Thoughts: Here's my thought process, summarized as you requested: **Navigating the Schedule** Okay, so I'm looking at this piece of code, and immediately I see it's part of the `ext` sched class. That's a key piece of context. Now, what's related to this? I have to consider the overall architecture. What is this module supposed to do? What's the scheduling strategy it employs? What other parts of the system interact with it? Right now, my mind goes to a specific function - `deferred_bal_cb_workfn`. Is this relevant? Is this *the* work function, or is it related, or a part of a larger, coordinated set of functions. I need to understand its relationship to the broader context of the system, and that's the next step I have to take. |
| 34/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "deferred_bal_cb_workfn",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=969=bool scx_cpu_valid(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, const char *where)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-978-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:979:static void deferred_bal_cb_workfn(struct rq *rq)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-980-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=2950=static inline void maybe_queue_balance_callback(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2957-\tqueue_balance_callback(rq, \u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_bal_cb,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:2958:\t\t\t\tdeferred_bal_cb_workfn);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2959-\n"
} |
| 35/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 21002 output: 36 thoughts: 12 Thoughts: Okay, here's my summary, taking on the persona you've described: **Considering Deferred Interrupt Handlers** Alright, let's think this through. My focus is always on optimized kernel performance, especially around interrupt handling. I'm deep in the weeds right now, trying to figure out the best approach for a particular problem. And right now, the question that's jumping to the forefront is: what about `deferred_irq_workfn`? Is this function, designed to defer interrupt-related work, the right tool for the job here? It seems like it could offer a path toward more predictable performance, and a way to avoid any potential blocking within the interrupt context. I need to weigh the pros and cons carefully, considering the specific hardware and the nature of the data involved. What's the latency impact of using this particular deferred work mechanism? And what's the threading model here? Is it appropriate for the task at hand? I need to analyze its suitability. I need to dive deeper into its implementation and benchmark it against other options to see if this is the best, most elegant, and most performant solution. This is where I start. |
| 36/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "deferred_irq_workfn",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=979=static void deferred_bal_cb_workfn(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-983-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:984:static void deferred_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-985-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=8576=void __init init_sched_ext_class(void)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8608-\t\tINIT_LIST_HEAD(\u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_users);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8609:\t\trq-\u003escx.deferred_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(deferred_irq_workfn);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8610-\t\trq-\u003escx.kick_cpus_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(kick_cpus_irq_workfn);\n"
} |
| 37/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 21570 output: 38 thoughts: 41 Thoughts: Okay, let's see... **Analyzing `run_deferred` Callsites** Alright, let's trace this. So `run_deferred` gets called from *these* places. Okay, got it. Hmm, now what's the most productive approach to dig in here, where to focus? Hmmm, is there a non-static function amongst all these calls that we can really drill into? I think that's the best way to move forward. Let's see if we can use `scx_bpf_kick_cpu` to move forward in our investigation. |
| 38/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "scx_bpf_kick_cpu",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=8705=__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8740- * %SCX_SLICE_INF, @p never expires and the BPF scheduler must kick the CPU with\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8741: * scx_bpf_kick_cpu() to trigger scheduling.\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8742- *\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9425=void scx_kick_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, u64 flags)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9435-\tif (unlikely(in_nmi())) {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9436:\t\tscx_error(sch, \"scx_bpf_kick_cpu() called from NMI\");\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9437-\t\treturn;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9491-/**\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9492: * scx_bpf_kick_cpu - Trigger reschedule on a CPU\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9493- * @cpu: cpu to kick\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9501- */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9502:__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_kick_cpu(s32 cpu, u64 flags, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9503-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9517- *\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9518: * cid-addressed equivalent of scx_bpf_kick_cpu(). An invalid @cid aborts the\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9519- * scheduler via scx_cid_to_cpu(). Caps are enforced on the delivery path: a\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=10586=BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10587:BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_kick_cpu, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10588-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_kick_cid, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=10652=BTF_KFUNCS_START(scx_kfunc_ids_cpu_only)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10653:BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_kick_cpu, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10654-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_task_cpu, KF_RCU)\n"
} |
| 39/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 22563 output: 35 thoughts: 39 Thoughts: Here's my thought process, summarized as if I were considering the code: **Thinking Through the Scheduler and Deferred Work** Okay, so `scx_bpf_kick_cpu` is the function that initiates a CPU reschedule, but I need to make sure I understand the full implications. My primary question is whether it also triggers `run_deferred`. I know `scx_kick_cpu` is involved here, so I need to dig into that function's implementation to be certain. Let me start there and follow the execution path. I need to know precisely what's deferred and how. Understanding the interplay between these functions is crucial for... [the user can fill in the purpose depending on the context]. |
| 40/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "scx_kick_cpu",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=5933=static void unbypass_renotify_idle(struct rq *rq, struct scx_sched *pos,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5972- *\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:5973: * - scx_kick_cpu() is disabled to avoid irq_work malfunction during PM\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5974- * operations.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=8442=static void kick_cpus_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8458-\t/*\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8459:\t * Walk scheds with pending kicks on this cpu. scx_kick_cpu() adds to\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8460-\t * the list under local_irq_save() and only this irq_work consumes it.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9411=__bpf_kfunc bool scx_bpf_task_set_dsq_vtime(struct task_struct *p, u64 vtime,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9424-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9425:void scx_kick_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, u64 flags)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9426-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9502=__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_kick_cpu(s32 cpu, u64 flags, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9508-\tif (likely(sch) \u0026\u0026 scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9509:\t\tscx_kick_cpu(sch, cpu, flags);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9510-}\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9524=__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_kick_cid(s32 cid, u64 flags, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9535-\t\treturn;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9536:\tscx_kick_cpu(sch, cpu, flags);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9537-}\n"
} |
| 41/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 23445 output: 35 thoughts: 67 Thoughts: Okay, let's break this down. **Investigating the Deferred Re-enqueue Process in the Kernel** Alright, I need to understand how this re-enqueue process works. My immediate thought is to trace the execution and check the `scx_bpf_dispatch` function or something similar. Where is the magic happening? Okay, I see that `process_deferred_reenq_users` is the key. But what triggers that function? It looks like `run_deferred` is responsible for processing `rq->scx.deferred_reenq_users`. I'm getting closer... So now the question is: where are items initially *added* to this `deferred_reenq_users` structure? That's the missing piece of the puzzle I need to find the cause of the problem. Time to dig deeper... |
| 42/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "deferred_reenq_users",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1065=void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1116-\t\t/*\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1117:\t\t * Pairs with smp_mb() in process_deferred_reenq_users() and\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1118-\t\t * guarantees that there is a reenq_user() afterwards.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1127-\t\t\tif (list_empty(\u0026dru-\u003enode))\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1128:\t\t\t\tlist_move_tail(\u0026dru-\u003enode, \u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_users);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1129-\t\t\tWRITE_ONCE(dru-\u003eflags, dru-\u003eflags | reenq_flags);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4434=static void reenq_user(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, u64 reenq_flags)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4504-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4505:static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4506-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4514-\t\t\tstruct scx_deferred_reenq_user *dru =\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4515:\t\t\t\tlist_first_entry_or_null(\u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_users,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4516-\t\t\t\t\t\t\t struct scx_deferred_reenq_user,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4541=static void run_deferred(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4547-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4548:\tif (!list_empty(\u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_users))\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4549:\t\tprocess_deferred_reenq_users(rq);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4550-\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=8576=void __init init_sched_ext_class(void)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8607-\t\tINIT_LIST_HEAD(\u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_locals);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:8608:\t\tINIT_LIST_HEAD(\u0026rq-\u003escx.deferred_reenq_users);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-8609-\t\trq-\u003escx.deferred_irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(deferred_irq_workfn);\n"
} |
| 43/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 24457 output: 36 thoughts: 33 Thoughts: Here's my thought process, as if I were analyzing that code: **Analyzing the Re-enqueue Mechanism** Okay, so `schedule_dsq_reenq` is clearly meant to add something to `deferred_reenq_users`. I need to figure out what that "something" is, and more importantly, understand the *context* of why we're deferring re-enqueuing in the first place. That variable name, `deferred_reenq_users`, implies there are users. So, my initial thought is, what criteria must a user meet to be deferred? Is the issue related to capacity, transient errors, or a more complex business rule? My immediate follow-up question is, where in the codebase is `schedule_dsq_reenq` actually being *called*? Finding the call sites will be critical to understanding the trigger conditions for this deferred re-enqueue. I need to trace the execution path and identify the scenarios that lead to calling that function. Is it part of a retry logic, a rate-limiting mechanism, or something entirely different? Without that context, I can't determine if this mechanism is optimal, efficient, or potentially introducing problems. I need to follow the call stack and understand the flow of control. |
| 44/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "schedule_dsq_reenq",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1025=static void schedule_deferred_locked(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1064-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1065:void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1066-\t\t\tu64 reenq_flags, struct rq *locked_rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4389=static void process_deferred_reenq_locals(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4420-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4421:\t\t/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4422-\t\tsmp_mb();\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4505=static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4530-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4531:\t\t/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4532-\t\tsmp_mb();\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9742=__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_dsq_reenq(u64 dsq_id, u64 reenq_flags,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9763-\tdsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, this_rq(), dsq_id, smp_processor_id());\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9764:\tschedule_dsq_reenq(sch, dsq, reenq_flags, scx_locked_rq());\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9765-}\n"
} |
| 45/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 25288 output: 40 thoughts: 204 Thoughts: **Analyzing a Potential Race Condition** Okay, so I'm looking at this `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` function. It looks like it calls `schedule_dsq_reenq`, and I see it's defined as a BPF kfunc. This is interesting. This means a BPF program can call `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq`, which in turn adds something to `deferred_reenq_users`. Then, later, `process_deferred_reenq_users` comes along and processes those users via `run_deferred`. My intuition is screaming "potential race condition!" because I see a situation where `destroy_dsq()` *might* invalidate the `dsq` object *before* `process_deferred_reenq_users` gets a chance to run. That's precisely the type of scenario I'm looking for. So, `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` is definitely a good candidate for a FocusSymbol, and, since it's a kfunc, it's a great entry point to start looking at. Now, let's just make sure it's not a static function. That would be an obvious blocker to me. |
| 46/2 | 2026/08/11 09:04 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "scx_bpf_dsq_reenq",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9703=__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *scx_bpf_dsq_peek(u64 dsq_id,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9727-/**\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9728: * scx_bpf_dsq_reenq - Re-enqueue tasks on a DSQ\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9729- * @dsq_id: DSQ to re-enqueue\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9741- */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9742:__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_dsq_reenq(u64 dsq_id, u64 reenq_flags,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9743-\t\t\t\t const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9774- *\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9775: * This is now a special case of scx_bpf_dsq_reenq() and may be removed in the\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9776- * future.\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9778=__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2(const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9779-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9780:\tscx_bpf_dsq_reenq(SCX_DSQ_LOCAL, 0, aux);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9781-}\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=10591=BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_peek, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU_PROTECTED | KF_RET_NULL)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10592:BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_reenq, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10593-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)\n"
} |
| 47/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 26397 output: 33 thoughts: 87 Thoughts: **Analyzing the DSQ Destruction Race** Okay, so I'm looking at this DSQ issue and, first things first, yes, `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` is definitely a kfunc, and crucially, it's non-static. That's a good starting point. I recall another one related to re-enqueueing is `scx_bpf_reenqueue_local___v2`. Now, the problem description is specifically pointing at a race condition during `destroy_dsq()`. Right, that function gets invoked when a DSQ is, well, destroyed. Seems logical. Time to dive into the code for `destroy_dsq()` and see what's happening under the hood that might be causing this race. I need to understand the exact mechanics of its operation to identify the potential concurrency issues. |
| 48/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "destroy_dsq",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4505=static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4533-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4534:\t\t/* destroy_dsq() may race and invalidate @dsq; skip */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4535-\t\tif (unlikely(dsq-\u003eid \u0026 SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN))\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=5019=static DEFINE_IRQ_WORK(free_dsq_irq_work, free_dsq_irq_workfn);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5020-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:5021:static void destroy_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, u64 dsq_id)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5022-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=5230=static void scx_sched_free_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5295-\t\twhile (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL((dsq = rhashtable_walk_next(\u0026rht_iter))))\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:5296:\t\t\tdestroy_dsq(sch, dsq-\u003eid);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5297-\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9547=__bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued(u64 dsq_id, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9584-/**\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9585: * scx_bpf_destroy_dsq - Destroy a custom DSQ\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9586- * @dsq_id: DSQ to destroy\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9593- */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9594:__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_destroy_dsq(u64 dsq_id, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9595-{\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9600-\tif (sch)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9601:\t\tdestroy_dsq(sch, dsq_id);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9602-}\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=10589=BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:10590:BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_destroy_dsq, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-10591-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_dsq_peek, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS | KF_RCU_PROTECTED | KF_RET_NULL)\n"
} |
| 49/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 27523 output: 27 thoughts: 450 Thoughts: **Analyzing a Race Condition in the Extensible Scheduler** Okay, so I'm digging into this fix related to the extensible scheduler (sched_ext) and a custom dispatch queue (DSQ). It looks like `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq` is the function that's responsible for destroying the DSQ. The core issue is a potential race condition between this destruction process and the deferred re-enqueue operations managed by `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq`. Therefore, my focus needs to be on these two functions: `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` and `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq`. I need to ensure they're behaving correctly in the face of each other. I've already confirmed they are both non-static and exported, specifically `__bpf_kfunc`, meaning they are accessible to BPF code, and therefore this race is a genuine concern. Essentially, this patch addresses a critical race condition within the core scheduling logic of sched_ext. This is the place to be, to look to be fuzzing. This is particularly relevant when a BPF scheduler is in use. Now, let's nail down what configurations are needed. We definitely need `SCHED_CLASS_EXT`. `BPF_SYSCALL` and `DEBUG_INFO_BTF` are usually standard for any BPF fuzzing setup anyway, so I'll assume those are in place. Therefore, `SCHED_CLASS_EXT` is the key configuration to enable, and I'll keep an eye out for any further dependencies. |
| 50/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "config SCHED_CLASS_EXT",
"PathPrefix": ""
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/Kconfig.preempt=151=config SCHED_CORE\n--\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt-168-\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt:169:config SCHED_CLASS_EXT\nkernel/Kconfig.preempt-170-\tbool \"Extensible Scheduling Class\"\n"
} |
| 51/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 28426 output: 38 thoughts: 211 Thoughts: **Analyzing the Scheduler Class Extension Race Condition** Okay, first things first, let's confirm my initial hypothesis. Is `SCHED_CLASS_EXT` truly the *only* scheduler class extension we need to consider here? Yes, that checks out. Good. Now, let's dive into the core of this potential race condition. Time to review the `FocusSymbols`. Right, so we have `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` and `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq`. Those are the BPF kfuncs that are relevant to this whole issue. We need to be precise about how they interact and where the vulnerability lies. Let's break down the sequence: First, `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` gets called. This function adds a `scx_deferred_reenq_user` to `rq->scx.deferred_reenq_users`. That's the enqueuing side. Then, concurrently, `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq` is called. Ah, right. This destroys the DSQ. This function sets the DSQ's ID to `SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN`... hold on, I should probably double-check that part. Ah, the patch notes clearly indicate that the DSQ's ID is set by `dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN`. Best to verify exactly what `destroy_dsq` does internally, just to be absolutely sure. Gotta be thorough. |
| 52/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | read-file |
0mArgs:{
"File": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c",
"FirstLine": 5021,
"LineCount": 50
}Results: {
"Contents": "5021:\tstatic void destroy_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, u64 dsq_id)\n5022:\t{\n5023:\t\tstruct scx_dispatch_q *dsq;\n5024:\t\tunsigned long flags;\n5025:\t\n5026:\t\trcu_read_lock();\n5027:\t\n5028:\t\tdsq = find_user_dsq(sch, dsq_id);\n5029:\t\tif (!dsq)\n5030:\t\t\tgoto out_unlock_rcu;\n5031:\t\n5032:\t\traw_spin_lock_irqsave(\u0026dsq-\u003elock, flags);\n5033:\t\n5034:\t\tif (dsq-\u003enr) {\n5035:\t\t\tscx_error(sch, \"attempting to destroy in-use dsq 0x%016llx (nr=%u)\",\n5036:\t\t\t\t dsq-\u003eid, dsq-\u003enr);\n5037:\t\t\tgoto out_unlock_dsq;\n5038:\t\t}\n5039:\t\n5040:\t\tif (rhashtable_remove_fast(\u0026sch-\u003edsq_hash, \u0026dsq-\u003ehash_node,\n5041:\t\t\t\t\t dsq_hash_params))\n5042:\t\t\tgoto out_unlock_dsq;\n5043:\t\n5044:\t\t/*\n5045:\t\t * Mark dead by invalidating -\u003eid to prevent scx_dispatch_enqueue() from\n5046:\t\t * queueing more tasks. As this function can be called from anywhere,\n5047:\t\t * freeing is bounced through an irq work to avoid nesting RCU\n5048:\t\t * operations inside scheduler locks.\n5049:\t\t */\n5050:\t\tdsq-\u003eid = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;\n5051:\t\tif (llist_add(\u0026dsq-\u003efree_node, \u0026dsqs_to_free))\n5052:\t\t\tirq_work_queue(\u0026free_dsq_irq_work);\n5053:\t\n5054:\tout_unlock_dsq:\n5055:\t\traw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(\u0026dsq-\u003elock, flags);\n5056:\tout_unlock_rcu:\n5057:\t\trcu_read_unlock();\n5058:\t}\n5059:\t\n5060:\t#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_GROUP_SCHED\n5061:\tstatic void scx_cgroup_exit(struct scx_sched *sch)\n5062:\t{\n5063:\t\tstruct cgroup_subsys_state *css;\n5064:\t\n5065:\t\t/*\n5066:\t\t * scx_tg_on/offline() are excluded through cgroup_lock(). If we walk\n5067:\t\t * cgroups and exit all the inited ones, all online cgroups are exited.\n5068:\t\t */\n5069:\t\tcss_for_each_descendant_post(css, \u0026root_task_group.css) {\n5070:\t\t\tstruct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);\n"
} |
| 53/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 29825 output: 36 thoughts: 40 Thoughts: Okay, here's my take on those thoughts, tailored for an expert audience: **Analyzing the `destroy_dsq` Function and Invalidating the Data Structure Identifier** Right, so `destroy_dsq` is clearly setting `dsq->id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID`. Makes sense; we're invalidating the data structure after destruction. Now, the next logical step is to immediately verify what `SCX_DSQ_INVALID` actually *is*. Is it -1? 0? Some large, improbable number? Understanding that constant is critical to ensuring we don't accidentally reuse the now-destroyed `dsq` handle without proper re-initialization, or worse, that it doesn't collide with some valid data structure. It's the lynchpin of the memory management strategy here and should be immediately verifiable by the team. |
| 54/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "SCX_DSQ_INVALID",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1622=static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1640-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1641:\t\tif (unlikely(dsq-\u003eid == SCX_DSQ_INVALID)) {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1642-\t\t\tscx_error(sch, \"attempting to dispatch to a destroyed dsq\");\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1888=static void mark_direct_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1911-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1912:\tWARN_ON_ONCE(p-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1913-\tWARN_ON_ONCE(p-\u003escx.ddsp_enq_flags);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1936=static inline void clear_direct_dispatch(struct task_struct *p)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1937-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1938:\tp-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1939-\tp-\u003escx.ddsp_enq_flags = 0;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=2010=void scx_do_enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2062-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:2063:\tif (p-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2064-\t\tgoto direct;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2096-\t*ddsp_taskp = NULL;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:2097:\tif (p-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2098-\t\tgoto direct;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=3956=void init_scx_entity(struct sched_ext_entity *scx)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3965-\tscx-\u003erunnable_at = jiffies;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:3966:\tscx-\u003eddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3967-\tscx-\u003eslice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=5021=static void destroy_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, u64 dsq_id)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5049-\t */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:5050:\tdsq-\u003eid = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5051-\tif (llist_add(\u0026dsq-\u003efree_node, \u0026dsqs_to_free))\n"
} |
| 55/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 30955 output: 27 thoughts: 40 Thoughts: Okay, let's see. My first thought is to pinpoint where this `SCX_DSQ_INVALID` constant is defined. Knowing the Linux kernel, the likely candidates are in the header files for scheduler extensions. I should check `include/uapi/linux/sched/ext.h` first, as that usually contains the user-space accessible definitions. If it's not there, then I'll delve deeper into the kernel's internal structures and look in `kernel/sched/ext/internal.h`. That seems like the logical progression to understanding its purpose and usage. Let's see what we can find. |
| 56/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "SCX_DSQ_INVALID",
"PathPrefix": ""
}Results: {
"Output": "include/linux/sched/ext.h=53=enum scx_dsq_id_flags {\n--\ninclude/linux/sched/ext.h-56-\ninclude/linux/sched/ext.h:57:\tSCX_DSQ_INVALID\t\t= SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN | 0,\ninclude/linux/sched/ext.h-58-\tSCX_DSQ_GLOBAL\t\t= SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN | 1,\n--\ninit/init_task.c=105=struct task_struct init_task __aligned(L1_CACHE_BYTES) = {\n--\ninit/init_task.c-150-\t\t.runnable_at\t= INITIAL_JIFFIES,\ninit/init_task.c:151:\t\t.ddsp_dsq_id\t= SCX_DSQ_INVALID,\ninit/init_task.c-152-\t\t.slice\t\t= SCX_SLICE_DFL,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1622=static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1640-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1641:\t\tif (unlikely(dsq-\u003eid == SCX_DSQ_INVALID)) {\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1642-\t\t\tscx_error(sch, \"attempting to dispatch to a destroyed dsq\");\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1888=static void mark_direct_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1911-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1912:\tWARN_ON_ONCE(p-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID);\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1913-\tWARN_ON_ONCE(p-\u003escx.ddsp_enq_flags);\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1936=static inline void clear_direct_dispatch(struct task_struct *p)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1937-{\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1938:\tp-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1939-\tp-\u003escx.ddsp_enq_flags = 0;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=2010=void scx_do_enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2062-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:2063:\tif (p-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2064-\t\tgoto direct;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2096-\t*ddsp_taskp = NULL;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:2097:\tif (p-\u003escx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-2098-\t\tgoto direct;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=3956=void init_scx_entity(struct sched_ext_entity *scx)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3965-\tscx-\u003erunnable_at = jiffies;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:3966:\tscx-\u003eddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-3967-\tscx-\u003eslice = SCX_SLICE_DFL;\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=5021=static void destroy_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch, u64 dsq_id)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5049-\t */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:5050:\tdsq-\u003eid = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-5051-\tif (llist_add(\u0026dsq-\u003efree_node, \u0026dsqs_to_free))\n--\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enum_defs.autogen.h-60-#define HAVE_SCX_DSQ_FLAG_LOCAL_ON\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enum_defs.autogen.h:61:#define HAVE_SCX_DSQ_INVALID\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enum_defs.autogen.h-62-#define HAVE_SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL\n--\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.bpf.h=43=const volatile u64 __SCX_DSQ_FLAG_LOCAL_ON __weak;\n--\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.bpf.h-45-\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.bpf.h:46:const volatile u64 __SCX_DSQ_INVALID __weak;\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.bpf.h:47:#define SCX_DSQ_INVALID __SCX_DSQ_INVALID\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.bpf.h-48-\n--\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.h-20-\tSCX_ENUM_SET(skel, scx_dsq_id_flags, SCX_DSQ_FLAG_LOCAL_ON); \\\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.h:21:\tSCX_ENUM_SET(skel, scx_dsq_id_flags, SCX_DSQ_INVALID); \\\ntools/sched_ext/include/scx/enums.autogen.h-22-\tSCX_ENUM_SET(skel, scx_dsq_id_flags, SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL); \\\n"
} |
| 57/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 32719 output: 36 thoughts: 363 Thoughts: **Analyzing the `SCX_DSQ_INVALID` Bug** Okay, so I see that `SCX_DSQ_INVALID` has the `SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN` flag set. This means that when we perform the bitwise AND operation, `dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN` will evaluate to true for `SCX_DSQ_INVALID`. The patch correctly recognizes this with `if (unlikely(dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN))` and then skips the invalid queue. This seems to align perfectly with the reported bug. I think I've got it. Now, let's identify the key functions involved, the "FocusSymbols" as I like to call them. Based on this, it looks like `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` and `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq` are where the action happens. Wait, `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` is a kfunc! That means it can be called directly from BPF code which is important, but what else? `destroy_dsq` is static, but it's called from `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq`. Then we have `process_deferred_reenq_users`, which is also static, but that's called from `run_deferred`. I have to trace how `run_deferred` is called, and that looks like `task_woken_scx`, `deferred_bal_cb_workfn`, and `deferred_irq_workfn`. Okay, so, with these connections, `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` and `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq` are definitely the right FocusSymbols. The way these things are called seems to explain the issue. Let's do a final check: I need to be sure that `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` is the only function adding to `deferred_reenq_users`. I see that `schedule_dsq_reenq` does add to this list. And, thankfully, `schedule_dsq_reenq` is called directly by `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq`. Perfect! No other obvious callers. I think I'm confident about these FocusSymbols. |
| 58/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | grepper |
0mArgs:{
"Expression": "schedule_dsq_reenq",
"PathPrefix": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c"
}Results: {
"Output": "kernel/sched/ext/ext.c=1025=static void schedule_deferred_locked(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1064-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:1065:void schedule_dsq_reenq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-1066-\t\t\tu64 reenq_flags, struct rq *locked_rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4389=static void process_deferred_reenq_locals(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4420-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4421:\t\t/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4422-\t\tsmp_mb();\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=4505=static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4530-\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:4531:\t\t/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-4532-\t\tsmp_mb();\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c=9742=__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_dsq_reenq(u64 dsq_id, u64 reenq_flags,\n--\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9763-\tdsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(sch, this_rq(), dsq_id, smp_processor_id());\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c:9764:\tschedule_dsq_reenq(sch, dsq, reenq_flags, scx_locked_rq());\nkernel/sched/ext/ext.c-9765-}\n"
} |
| 59/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | patch-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 34131 output: 127 thoughts: 86 Thoughts: Here's my take on the situation: **Refining the Focus: A Quick Recap and Confirmation** Okay, so I've zeroed in on the key functions driving this behavior: `scx_bpf_dsq_reenq` is the critical one, as it's the sole caller of `schedule_dsq_reenq`, which is the behavior I want to understand. This, combined with `scx_bpf_destroy_dsq`, seems to be where the interesting interactions happen. Given that, I'm fairly certain those two functions are the important `FocusSymbols`. And the relevant `EnableConfigs` remains as `SCHED_CLASS_EXT`, that is where the functionality is. Now, before I move on, it's just a matter of a final verification using the set-results tool. A quick, last double-check will give me additional confidence in the results before I dig deeper. |
| 60/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | set-results |
0mArgs:{
"EnableConfigs": [
"SCHED_CLASS_EXT"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"scx_bpf_dsq_reenq",
"scx_bpf_destroy_dsq"
],
"Reasoning": "The patch fixes a race condition in the extensible scheduler class (sched_ext) where a custom dispatch queue (DSQ) could be destroyed while there are still pending deferred re-enqueue operations. This is a core scheduling logic fix that is reachable when a BPF scheduler is loaded and uses custom DSQs.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
}Results: {
"EnableConfigs": [
"SCHED_CLASS_EXT"
],
"FocusSymbols": [
"scx_bpf_dsq_reenq",
"scx_bpf_destroy_dsq"
],
"Reasoning": "The patch fixes a race condition in the extensible scheduler class (sched_ext) where a custom dispatch queue (DSQ) could be destroyed while there are still pending deferred re-enqueue operations. This is a core scheduling logic fix that is reachable when a BPF scheduler is loaded and uses custom DSQs.",
"WorthFuzzing": true
} |
| 61/1 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | action | If |
0mArgs:{
"WorthFuzzing": true
}Results: null |
| 62/2 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | agent | kmsan-evaluator |
0mModel:best-expensive Args: null Results: {
"KMSANReasoning": "The patch replaces a BUG_ON() with a conditional check and a `continue` statement to handle a race condition where `destroy_dsq()` might invalidate a dispatch queue (`dsq`). This change prevents a kernel panic (BUG_ON) and handles the race gracefully. It does not introduce any new allocations, copy data to user space, or involve uninitialized memory. Any potential use-after-free issues related to the race condition would be caught by KASAN. Therefore, KMSAN is not required.",
"NeedsKMSAN": false
}Instruction: You are an expert Linux kernel security engineer specializing in kernel memory
error detectors (KASAN and KMSAN). Your job is to review the provided patch series and
determine if the code changes justify spawning a dedicated KMSAN (KernelMemorySanitizer)
fuzzing session in addition to standard KASAN fuzzing.
CRITICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN KASAN AND KMSAN:
- Standard KASAN kernel builds (upstream-apparmor-kasan.config) already enable
a comprehensive suite of debugging tools and sanitizers, including KASAN
(out-of-bounds accesses, use-after-free, double free, invalid free), LOCKDEP
(locking bugs and deadlocks), UB-sanitizers, and memory corruption checks.
- KMSAN (KernelMemorySanitizer) detects reads of UNINITIALIZED memory (stack, heap,
or page allocations) and kernel-to-user memory info-leaks.
Rule: THERE IS NO SENSE IN RUNNING A KMSAN SESSION IF A BUG CAN BE CAUGHT BY KASAN,
LOCKDEP, OR OTHER STANDARD BUG DETECTORS.
A dedicated KMSAN fuzzing session incurs significant resource costs. You must ONLY
set NeedsKMSAN=true if the code changes introduce or expose UNINITIALIZED MEMORY risks
that are detected ONLY by KMSAN.
Look holistically at the patch series and surrounding code. Even if no direct
uninitialized field accesses or new buffer allocations are added in the diff itself,
a patch may alter control flow, bounds checking, or data length calculations in ways
that change how the rest of the code operates on existing buffers (e.g. allowing
uninitialized stack/heap memory to be read, copied to user space, or used in control
flow). Do not hesitate to use your code access tools to inspect the surrounding code,
called functions, and callers.
Set NeedsKMSAN=true ONLY IF the patch introduces or modifies:
1. Kernel structures sent to user space (via copy_to_user, put_user, netlink skb
attributes, ioctl output arguments, socket options, or BPF buffers) where fields
or structure padding might not be fully initialized/zeroed.
2. Conditional logic or branching that depends on potentially uninitialized variables
or struct fields.
3. Allocation or initialization of complex data structures where uninitialized fields
could be read later in reachable code paths.
4. Bounds checks, lengths, or logic in a way that allows surrounding code to access
uninitialized bytes of existing buffers.
Set NeedsKMSAN=false IF:
- The code changes primarily risk out-of-bounds access, array overflows, NULL pointer
dereferences, locking deadlocks, or use-after-free bugs (these are already caught
by KASAN, LOCKDEP, or standard bug detectors).
- All stack/heap structures touched or introduced by the patch are fully zeroed
or initialized (e.g. using = {0}, memset, kzalloc) before being read or copied.
- The patch does not introduce any risk of uninitialized memory usage or info-leaks.
Use your code access tools to inspect the surrounding code if necessary, then provide
detailed KMSANReasoning contrasting KASAN vs KMSAN applicability for this patch.
Prefer calling several tools at the same time to save round-trips.
Use set-results tool to provide results of the analysis.
It must be called exactly once before the final reply.
Ignore results of this tool.
Prompt: For your convenience, here is the diff of the changes:
commit 8df74a5e487b644f699a225bbaf5d69064e5a35a
Author: syz-cluster <triage@syzkaller.com>
Date: Tue Aug 11 09:03:27 2026 +0000
syz-cluster: applied patch under review
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 0bbe144c98111..604a05da41b93 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -4531,7 +4531,9 @@ static void process_deferred_reenq_users(struct rq *rq)
/* see schedule_dsq_reenq() */
smp_mb();
- BUG_ON(dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN);
+ /* destroy_dsq() may race and invalidate @dsq; skip */
+ if (unlikely(dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN))
+ continue;
reenq_user(rq, dsq, reenq_flags);
}
}
|
| 63/3 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | llm | kmsan-evaluator |
0mModel:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Args: null Results: null Tokens: input: 2018 output: 131 thoughts: 327 Thoughts: **Analyzing a Kernel Scheduler Patch** Okay, so I'm looking at this patch for `kernel/sched/ext/ext.c`. It's tweaking the `process_deferred_reenq_users` function. The key change is that they're replacing a `BUG_ON` check with a conditional skip. Specifically, `BUG_ON(dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN);` is now an `if (unlikely(dsq->id & SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN)) continue;`. Seems like a bug fix, right? The comment indicates it's to address a race condition where `destroy_dsq()` might invalidate `dsq` by setting the `SCX_DSQ_FLAG_BUILTIN` flag. Essentially, it was crashing with a `BUG_ON` due to a race condition. It's not about uninitialized memory, which is good. Definitely doesn't introduce any, so I'll set NeedsKMSAN to false. Let me just double-check, though. Okay, the code reads `dsq`. If it's invalidated, that *could* be a use-after-free, and KASAN would normally catch that. Wait, but `destroy_dsq()` invalidates it by setting the flag? Hmm... no, no, the patch itself just changes a `BUG_ON` to a skip. So the function will just skip a specific DSQ if the race condition has occurred. No uninitialized memory is involved at all. Looks solid. I'll call set-results. |
| 64/3 | 2026/08/11 09:05 | tool | set-results |
0mArgs:{
"KMSANReasoning": "The patch replaces a BUG_ON() with a conditional check and a `continue` statement to handle a race condition where `destroy_dsq()` might invalidate a dispatch queue (`dsq`). This change prevents a kernel panic (BUG_ON) and handles the race gracefully. It does not introduce any new allocations, copy data to user space, or involve uninitialized memory. Any potential use-after-free issues related to the race condition would be caught by KASAN. Therefore, KMSAN is not required.",
"NeedsKMSAN": false
}Results: {
"KMSANReasoning": "The patch replaces a BUG_ON() with a conditional check and a `continue` statement to handle a race condition where `destroy_dsq()` might invalidate a dispatch queue (`dsq`). This change prevents a kernel panic (BUG_ON) and handles the race gracefully. It does not introduce any new allocations, copy data to user space, or involve uninitialized memory. Any potential use-after-free issues related to the race condition would be caught by KASAN. Therefore, KMSAN is not required.",
"NeedsKMSAN": false
} |
| Total Calls | Total Tokens | Avg Tokens | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|
| Total Calls | Total Duration (Seconds) | Avg Duration (Seconds) |
|---|