Syzbot CI
All Series
Statistics
Content
×
Patch Series
Subject
Document synchronization used in managing guest faults
Author
devnull@kernel.org
Date
2026-05-27 15:33:13 +0000 UTC
Version
Version 1
Cc
ackerleytng@google.com
bp@alien8.de
chenhuacai@kernel.org
corbet@lwn.net
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
devnull@kernel.org
hpa@zytor.com
kernel@xen0n.name
kvm@vger.kernel.org
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
loongarch@lists.linux.dev
maobibo@loongson.cn
mingo@redhat.com
pbonzini@redhat.com
seanjc@google.com
skhan@linuxfoundation.org
tabba@google.com
tglx@kernel.org
vannapurve@google.com
x86@kernel.org
zhaotianrui@loongson.cn
Patches (12)
Name
Content
[All]
[PATCH RFC 01/12] Documentation: KVM: Elaborate comment on kvm_usage_lock
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 02/12] Documentation: KVM: Consolidate notes about cpu_read_lock() and kvm_lock
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 03/12] Documentation: KVM: Consolidate notes about kvm->slots_lock and irq_lock
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 04/12] Documentation: KVM: Turn - into bullet point
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 05/12] Documentation: KVM: Explain what rule the exception section is meant for
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 06/12] Documentation: KVM: Have actual headings for exceptions
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 07/12] Documentation: KVM: Drop mention of kvm->lock in SRCU documentation
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 08/12] Documentation: KVM: Add example for kvm->srcu in relation to mutex/lock
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 09/12] Documentation: KVM: Document synchronization for managing guest faults
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 10/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Clarify comment about gmem.file vs kvm->srcu
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 11/12] KVM: mmu: Point users of host_pfn_mapping_level() to docs
[Body]
[PATCH RFC 12/12] Documentation: KVM: Focus acquisition order section on preventing deadlocks
[Body]
Session 2026-05-27
ID (for dev)
f7cbd79c-8f85-4c43-a753-f6bfb9b24789
Status
waiting
Test
Base
Patched
Verdict