Complete the missing @param and @return tags in the Doxygen comments of the btf.h file. Signed-off-by: Jianyun Gao --- v1->v2: Try to fix the CI FAILURE issue by rebasing the local code to the latest version. The v1 version is here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251030113254.1254264-1-jianyungao89@gmail.com/ tools/lib/bpf/btf.h | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h index ccfd905f03df..cc01494d6210 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ LIBBPF_API struct btf *btf__new_empty(void); * @brief **btf__new_empty_split()** creates an unpopulated BTF object from an * ELF BTF section except with a base BTF on top of which split BTF should be * based + * @param base_btf base BTF object * @return new BTF object instance which has to be eventually freed with * **btf__free()** * @@ -115,6 +116,10 @@ LIBBPF_API struct btf *btf__new_empty_split(struct btf *base_btf); * When that split BTF is loaded against a (possibly changed) base, this * distilled base BTF will help update references to that (possibly changed) * base BTF. + * @param src_btf source split BTF object + * @param new_base_btf pointer to where the new base BTF object pointer will be stored + * @param new_split_btf pointer to where the new split BTF object pointer will be stored + * @return 0 on success; negative error code, otherwise * * Both the new split and its associated new base BTF must be freed by * the caller. @@ -264,6 +269,9 @@ LIBBPF_API int btf__dedup(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_dedup_opts *opts); * to base BTF kinds, and verify those references are compatible with * *base_btf*; if they are, *btf* is adjusted such that is re-parented to * *base_btf* and type ids and strings are adjusted to accommodate this. + * @param btf split BTF object to relocate + * @param base_btf base BTF object + * @return 0 on success; negative error code, otherwise * * If successful, 0 is returned and **btf** now has **base_btf** as its * base. -- 2.34.1