Commit cc0cc23babc9 ("powerpc/xive: Untangle xive from child interrupt controller drivers") changed xive_irq_data to be stashed to chip_data instead of handler_data. However, multiple places are still attempting to read xive_irq_data from handler_data and get a NULL pointer deference bug. Update them to read xive_irq_data from chip_data. Non-XIVE files which touch xive_irq_data seem quite strange to me, especially the ocxl driver. I think there ought to be an alternative platform-independent solution, instead of touching XIVE's data directly. Therefore, I think this whole thing should be cleaned up. But perhaps I just misunderstand something. In any case, this cleanup would not be trivial; for now, just get things working again. Fixes: cc0cc23babc9 ("powerpc/xive: Untangle xive from child interrupt controller drivers") Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/68e48df8.170a0220.4b4b0.217d@mx.google.com/ Signed-off-by: Nam Cao --- VAS and OCXL has not been tested. I noticed them while grepping. --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c | 12 ++++-------- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 2 +- drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c index 1302b5ac5672..89a1b8c21ab4 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c @@ -916,8 +916,7 @@ int kvmppc_xive_attach_escalation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 prio, * it fires once. */ if (single_escalation) { - struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(xc->esc_virq[prio]); - struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d); + struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_get_chip_data(xc->esc_virq[prio]); xive_vm_esb_load(xd, XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_01); vcpu->arch.xive_esc_raddr = xd->eoi_page; @@ -1612,7 +1611,7 @@ int kvmppc_xive_set_mapped(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long guest_irq, /* Grab info about irq */ state->pt_number = hw_irq; - state->pt_data = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(host_data); + state->pt_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(host_data); /* * Configure the IRQ to match the existing configuration of @@ -1787,8 +1786,7 @@ void kvmppc_xive_disable_vcpu_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ void xive_cleanup_single_escalation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq) { - struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq); - struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d); + struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_get_chip_data(irq); /* * This slightly odd sequence gives the right result @@ -2827,9 +2825,7 @@ int kvmppc_xive_debug_show_queues(struct seq_file *m, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) i0, i1); } if (xc->esc_virq[i]) { - struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(xc->esc_virq[i]); - struct xive_irq_data *xd = - irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d); + struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_get_chip_data(xc->esc_virq[i]); u64 pq = xive_vm_esb_load(xd, XIVE_ESB_GET); seq_printf(m, " ESC %d %c%c EOI @%llx", diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c index b65256a63e87..9c9650319f3b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int init_vas_instance(struct platform_device *pdev) return -EINVAL; } - xd = irq_get_handler_data(vinst->virq); + xd = irq_get_chip_data(vinst->virq); if (!xd) { pr_err("Inst%d: Invalid virq %d\n", vinst->vas_id, vinst->virq); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c index 625361a15424..8d0123b0ae84 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c @@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ static void xive_flush_cpu_queue(unsigned int cpu, struct xive_cpu *xc) cpu, irq); #endif raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock); - xd = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); + xd = irq_desc_get_chip_data(desc); /* * Clear saved_p to indicate that it's no longer pending diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c index 36f7379b8e2d..f6b821fc274c 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ u64 ocxl_afu_irq_get_addr(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id) mutex_lock(&ctx->irq_lock); irq = idr_find(&ctx->irq_idr, irq_id); if (irq) { - xd = irq_get_handler_data(irq->virq); + xd = irq_get_chip_data(irq->virq); addr = xd ? xd->trig_page : 0; } mutex_unlock(&ctx->irq_lock); -- 2.51.0