ASAN reported a resource leak due to the bpf_object not being tracked in test_sysctl. Add obj field to struct sysctl_test to properly clean it up. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c index 273dd41ca09e..2a1ff821bc97 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_sysctl.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct sysctl_test { OP_EPERM, SUCCESS, } result; + struct bpf_object *obj; }; static struct sysctl_test tests[] = { @@ -1471,6 +1472,7 @@ static int load_sysctl_prog_file(struct sysctl_test *test) return -1; } + test->obj = obj; return prog_fd; } @@ -1573,6 +1575,7 @@ static int run_test_case(int cgfd, struct sysctl_test *test) /* Detaching w/o checking return code: best effort attempt. */ if (progfd != -1) bpf_prog_detach(cgfd, atype); + bpf_object__close(test->obj); close(progfd); printf("[%s]\n", err ? "FAIL" : "PASS"); return err; -- 2.53.0