From: Yevgeny Kliteynik If rule creation failed due to a full queue, due to timeout in polling for completion, or due to matcher being in resize, don't try to initiate rehash sequence - rehash would have failed anyway. Fixes: 2111bb970c78 ("net/mlx5: HWS, added backward-compatible API handling") Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik Reviewed-by: Vlad Dogaru Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch --- .../mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c index 2a59be11fe55..adeccc588e5d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/hws/bwc.c @@ -1063,6 +1063,21 @@ int mlx5hws_bwc_rule_create_simple(struct mlx5hws_bwc_rule *bwc_rule, return 0; /* rule inserted successfully */ } + /* Rule insertion could fail due to queue being full, timeout, or + * matcher in resize. In such cases, no point in trying to rehash. + */ + if (ret == -EBUSY || ret == -ETIMEDOUT || ret == -EAGAIN) { + mutex_unlock(queue_lock); + mlx5hws_err(ctx, + "BWC rule insertion failed - %s (%d)\n", + ret == -EBUSY ? "queue is full" : + ret == -ETIMEDOUT ? "timeout" : + ret == -EAGAIN ? "matcher in resize" : "N/A", + ret); + hws_bwc_rule_cnt_dec(bwc_rule); + return ret; + } + /* At this point the rule wasn't added. * It could be because there was collision, or some other problem. * Try rehash by size and insert rule again - last chance. -- 2.34.1