The actual code is right, but the comment is the wrong way around. Fixes: ed82f35b926b ("io_uring: allow registration of per-task restrictions") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn --- io_uring/register.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/io_uring/register.c b/io_uring/register.c index 6015a3e9ce69..3378014e51fb 100644 --- a/io_uring/register.c +++ b/io_uring/register.c @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int io_register_restrictions_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args) return -EPERM; /* * Similar to seccomp, disallow setting a filter if task_no_new_privs - * is true and we're not CAP_SYS_ADMIN. + * is false and we're not CAP_SYS_ADMIN. */ if (!task_no_new_privs(current) && !ns_capable_noaudit(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int io_register_bpf_filter_task(void __user *arg, unsigned int nr_args) /* * Similar to seccomp, disallow setting a filter if task_no_new_privs - * is true and we're not CAP_SYS_ADMIN. + * is false and we're not CAP_SYS_ADMIN. */ if (!task_no_new_privs(current) && !ns_capable_noaudit(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) --- base-commit: 55a6202e7bbea301c06ad1bb0e18f7799cac383e change-id: 20260309-uring-nnp-comment-fix-2d33b61cee0a -- Jann Horn