damon_ctx->passed_sample_intervals and damos->next_apply_sis are unsigned long, and compared via normal comparison operators. It is unsafe from overflow. Use time_before(), which is safe from overflow when correctly used, instead. Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park --- mm/damon/core.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c index c4c30824465ee..4ede733a94cc0 100644 --- a/mm/damon/core.c +++ b/mm/damon/core.c @@ -2095,7 +2095,7 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c, damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) { struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota; - if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis) + if (time_before(c->passed_sample_intervals, s->next_apply_sis)) continue; if (!s->wmarks.activated) @@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c) bool has_schemes_to_apply = false; damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) { - if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis) + if (time_before(c->passed_sample_intervals, s->next_apply_sis)) continue; if (!s->wmarks.activated) @@ -2477,7 +2477,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c) } damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) { - if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis) + if (time_before(c->passed_sample_intervals, s->next_apply_sis)) continue; damos_walk_complete(c, s); damos_set_next_apply_sis(s, c); -- 2.47.3