damon_test_split_evenly_succ() is assuming all dynamic memory allocation in it will succeed. Those are indeed likely in the real use cases since those allocations are too small to fail, but theoretically those could fail. In the case, inappropriate memory access can happen. Fix it by appropriately cleanup pre-allocated memory and skip the execution of the remaining tests in the failure cases. Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests") Cc: # 5.15.x Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park --- mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h index 1b0f21c2e376..30dc5459f1d2 100644 --- a/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h +++ b/mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit.h @@ -284,10 +284,17 @@ static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces) { struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(); - struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end); + struct damon_region *r; unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces; unsigned long i = 0; + if (!t) + kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail"); + r = damon_new_region(start, end); + if (!r) { + damon_free_target(t); + kunit_skip(test, "region alloc fail"); + } damon_add_region(r, t); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0); -- 2.47.3