A few variables linked to the in-kernel Path-Manager are confusing, and it would help current and future developers, to clarify them. One of them is 'local_addr_list', which in fact represents the list of endpoints, and not only the 'subflow' endpoints. No functional changes intended. Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) --- net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c index e62e21eb9da12a7b361049efce1ba193fcbdc572..056624965546dac7e087c82c9df8c496c8959f33 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ static int pm_nl_pernet_id; struct pm_nl_pernet { /* protects pernet updates */ spinlock_t lock; - struct list_head local_addr_list; + struct list_head endp_list; unsigned int addrs; unsigned int stale_loss_cnt; unsigned int endp_signal_max; @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ select_local_address(const struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, msk_owned_by_me(msk); rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->local_addr_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->endp_list, list) { if (!(entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW)) continue; @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ select_signal_address(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_sock *msk, * Note: removal from the local address list during the msk life-cycle * can lead to additional addresses not being announced. */ - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->local_addr_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->endp_list, list) { if (!test_bit(entry->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap)) continue; @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ __lookup_addr_by_id(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, unsigned int id) { struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->local_addr_list, list, + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->endp_list, list, lockdep_is_held(&pernet->lock)) { if (entry->addr.id == id) return entry; @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ __lookup_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_addr_info *info) { struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->local_addr_list, list, + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->endp_list, list, lockdep_is_held(&pernet->lock)) { if (mptcp_addresses_equal(&entry->addr, info, entry->addr.port)) return entry; @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ fill_local_addresses_vec_fullmesh(struct mptcp_sock *msk, limit_extra_subflows = mptcp_pm_get_limit_extra_subflows(msk); rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->local_addr_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->endp_list, list) { bool is_id0; if (!(entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH)) @@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, */ if (!address_use_port(entry)) entry->addr.port = 0; - list_for_each_entry(cur, &pernet->local_addr_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry(cur, &pernet->endp_list, list) { if (mptcp_addresses_equal(&cur->addr, &entry->addr, cur->addr.port || entry->addr.port)) { /* allow replacing the exiting endpoint only if such @@ -712,9 +712,9 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, pernet->addrs++; if (!entry->addr.port) - list_add_tail_rcu(&entry->list, &pernet->local_addr_list); + list_add_tail_rcu(&entry->list, &pernet->endp_list); else - list_add_rcu(&entry->list, &pernet->local_addr_list); + list_add_rcu(&entry->list, &pernet->endp_list); ret = entry->addr.id; out: @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) LIST_HEAD(free_list); spin_lock_bh(&pernet->lock); - list_splice_init(&pernet->local_addr_list, &free_list); + list_splice_init(&pernet->endp_list, &free_list); __reset_counters(pernet); pernet->next_id = 1; bitmap_zero(pernet->id_bitmap, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1); @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static int __net_init pm_nl_init_net(struct net *net) { struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet = pm_nl_get_pernet(net); - INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&pernet->local_addr_list); + INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&pernet->endp_list); /* Cit. 2 subflows ought to be enough for anybody. */ pernet->limit_extra_subflows = 2; @@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ static void __net_exit pm_nl_exit_net(struct list_head *net_list) * other modifiers, also netns core already waited for a * RCU grace period. */ - __flush_addrs(&pernet->local_addr_list); + __flush_addrs(&pernet->endp_list); } } -- 2.51.0