With arm64 64K page size, the following 4 subtests failed: #97/25 dynptr/test_probe_read_user_dynptr:FAIL #97/26 dynptr/test_probe_read_kernel_dynptr:FAIL #97/27 dynptr/test_probe_read_user_str_dynptr:FAIL #97/28 dynptr/test_probe_read_kernel_str_dynptr:FAIL These failures are due to function bpf_dynptr_check_off_len() in include/linux/bpf.h where there is a test if (len > size || offset > size - len) return -E2BIG; With 64K page size, the 'offset' is greater than 'size - len', which caused the test failure. For 64KB page size, this patch increased the xdp buffer size from 5000 to 90000. The above 4 test failures are fixed as 'size' value is increased. But it introduced two new failures: #97/4 dynptr/test_dynptr_copy_xdp:FAIL #97/12 dynptr/test_dynptr_memset_xdp_chunks:FAIL These two failures will be addressed in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c index f2b65398afce..9b2d9ceda210 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dynptr.c @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ static struct { {"test_copy_from_user_task_str_dynptr", SETUP_SYSCALL_SLEEP}, }; +#define PAGE_SIZE_64K 65536 + static void verify_success(const char *prog_name, enum test_setup_type setup_type) { char user_data[384] = {[0 ... 382] = 'a', '\0'}; @@ -146,14 +148,18 @@ static void verify_success(const char *prog_name, enum test_setup_type setup_typ } case SETUP_XDP_PROG: { - char data[5000]; + char data[90000]; int err, prog_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts, .data_in = &data, - .data_size_in = sizeof(data), .repeat = 1, ); + if (getpagesize() == PAGE_SIZE_64K) + opts.data_size_in = sizeof(data); + else + opts.data_size_in = 5000; + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog); err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &opts); -- 2.47.3