Corrected a few spelling mistakes to improve the readability. Signed-off-by: Ranganath V N --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +- Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst | 2 +- Documentation/virt/kvm/review-checklist.rst | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst index 46d0b036c97e..191085b0d5e8 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ I. For patch submitters any DTS patches, regardless whether using existing or new bindings, should be placed at the end of patchset to indicate no dependency of drivers on the DTS. DTS will be anyway applied through separate tree or branch, so - different order would indicate the serie is non-bisectable. + different order would indicate the series is non-bisectable. If a driver subsystem maintainer prefers to apply entire set, instead of their relevant portion of patchset, please split the DTS patches into diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst index 067ed8e14ef3..387fd9cc72ca 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ The fields are as follows: - ``writeback_submit``: Submit the previous built writeback context. Block based file systems should use the iomap_ioend_writeback_submit helper, other file system can implement their own. - File systems can optionall to hook into writeback bio submission. + File systems can optionally hook into writeback bio submission. This might include pre-write space accounting updates, or installing a custom ``->bi_end_io`` function for internal purposes, such as deferring the ioend completion to a workqueue to run metadata update diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/review-checklist.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/review-checklist.rst index debac54e14e7..053f00c50d66 100644 --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/review-checklist.rst +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/review-checklist.rst @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ New APIs It is important to demonstrate your use case. This can be as simple as explaining that the feature is already in use on bare metal, or it can be a proof-of-concept implementation in userspace. The latter need not be - open source, though that is of course preferrable for easier testing. + open source, though that is of course preferable for easier testing. Selftests should test corner cases of the APIs, and should also cover basic host and guest operation if no open source VMM uses the feature. -- 2.43.0