From: Xu Kuohai Add verifier tests to validate bpf_set_retval argument for cgroup program types. Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis #v1 Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 + .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_cgroup.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_cgroup.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c index 06cd24e37b3f..d24d52a44425 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ #include "verifier_xdp.skel.h" #include "verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access.skel.h" #include "verifier_bits_iter.skel.h" +#include "verifier_cgroup.skel.h" #include "verifier_lsm.skel.h" #include "verifier_jit_inline.skel.h" #include "irq.skel.h" @@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ void test_verifier_xadd(void) { RUN(verifier_xadd); } void test_verifier_xdp(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp); } void test_verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access(void) { RUN(verifier_xdp_direct_packet_access); } void test_verifier_bits_iter(void) { RUN(verifier_bits_iter); } +void test_verifier_cgroup(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup); } void test_verifier_lsm(void) { RUN(verifier_lsm); } void test_irq(void) { RUN(irq); } void test_verifier_mtu(void) { RUN(verifier_mtu); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_cgroup.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..cc95e066bf61 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_cgroup.c @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "bpf_misc.h" + +/* + * Cgroup programs set return values via bpf_set_retval() helper. + * The helper argument must be 0 (success) or negative errno. + * Positive values bypass IS_ERR() check and can cause kernel issues. + */ + +SEC("lsm_cgroup/socket_create") +__description("lsm_cgroup bpf_set_retval success") +__success +int BPF_PROG(lsm_cgroup_set_retval_zero_valid, int family, int type, int protocol, int kern) +{ + bpf_set_retval(0); + return 0; +} + +SEC("lsm_cgroup/socket_create") +__description("lsm_cgroup bpf_set_retval valid errno") +__success +int BPF_PROG(lsm_cgroup_set_retval_negative_valid, int family, int type, int protocol, int kern) +{ + bpf_set_retval(-12); + return 0; +} + +SEC("lsm_cgroup/socket_create") +__description("lsm_cgroup bpf_set_retval invalid negative value") +__failure __msg("should have been in [-4095, 0]") +int BPF_PROG(lsm_cgroup_set_retval_negative_invalid, int family, int type, int protocol, int kern) +{ + bpf_set_retval(-4096); + return 0; +} + +SEC("lsm_cgroup/socket_create") +__description("lsm_cgroup bpf_set_retval invalid positive value") +__failure __msg("should have been in [-4095, 0]") +int BPF_PROG(lsm_cgroup_set_retval_positive_invalid, int family, int type, int protocol, int kern) +{ + bpf_set_retval(1); + return 0; +} + +SEC("cgroup/dev") +__description("cgroup_device bpf_set_retval success") +__success +int cgroup_dev_set_retval_0(struct bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx *ctx) +{ + bpf_set_retval(0); + return 1; +} + +SEC("cgroup/dev") +__description("cgroup_device bpf_set_retval valid errno") +__success +int cgroup_dev_set_retval_neg_maxerrno(struct bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx *ctx) +{ + bpf_set_retval(-4095); + return 1; +} + +SEC("cgroup/dev") +__description("cgroup_device bpf_set_retval invalid positive value") +__failure __msg("should have been in [-4095, 0]") +int cgroup_dev_set_retval_1(struct bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx *ctx) +{ + bpf_set_retval(1); + return 1; +} + +SEC("cgroup/dev") +__description("cgroup_device bpf_set_retval invalid negative value") +__failure __msg("should have been in [-4095, 0]") +int cgroup_dev_set_retval_neg_4096(struct bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx *ctx) +{ + bpf_set_retval(-4096); + return 1; +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; -- 2.43.0