Bernd has reported a lockdep splat from flexible proportions code that is essentially complaining about the following race: run_timer_softirq - we are in softirq context call_timer_fn writeout_period fprop_new_period write_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence); ... blk_mq_end_request() blk_update_request() ext4_end_bio() folio_end_writeback() __wb_writeout_add() __fprop_add_percpu_max() if (unlikely(max_frac < FPROP_FRAC_BASE)) { fprop_fraction_percpu() seq = read_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence); - sees odd sequence so loops indefinitely Note that a deadlock like this is only possible if the bdi has configured maximum fraction of writeout throughput which is very rare in general but frequent for example for FUSE bdis. To fix this problem we have to make sure write section of the sequence counter is irqsafe. Reported-by: Bernd Schubert Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9b845a47-9aee-43dd-99bc-1a82bea00442@bsbernd.com/ Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- lib/flex_proportions.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/flex_proportions.c b/lib/flex_proportions.c index 84ecccddc771..012d5614efb9 100644 --- a/lib/flex_proportions.c +++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c @@ -64,13 +64,14 @@ void fprop_global_destroy(struct fprop_global *p) bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods) { s64 events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events); + unsigned long flags; /* * Don't do anything if there are no events. */ if (events <= 1) return false; - preempt_disable_nested(); + local_irq_save(flags); write_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence); if (periods < 64) events -= events >> periods; @@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods) percpu_counter_add(&p->events, -events); p->period += periods; write_seqcount_end(&p->sequence); - preempt_enable_nested(); + local_irq_restore(flags); return true; } -- 2.51.0