5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Bard Liao [ Upstream commit 38cd651ebce7065a81c7e950d9e2ea1572304605 ] It doesn't make sense to handle an alert event when the peripheral is not attached. The slave->status could be SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED or SDW_SLAVE_ALERT when it is attached on the bus. Signed-off-by: Bard Liao Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260520025720.1999367-1-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c index 230a3250f3154..3317bc9221b48 100644 --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c @@ -1798,6 +1798,10 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus, break; case SDW_SLAVE_ALERT: + if (slave->status != SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED && + slave->status != SDW_SLAVE_ALERT) + continue; + ret = sdw_handle_slave_alerts(slave); if (ret < 0) dev_err(&slave->dev, -- 2.53.0