Syzkaller found a kernel warning on the following sock_addr program: 0: r0 = 0 1: r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +60) 2: exit which triggers: verifier bug: error during ctx access conversion (0) This is happening because offset 60 in bpf_sock_addr corresponds to an implicit padding of 4 bytes, right after msg_src_ip4. Access to this padding isn't rejected in sock_addr_is_valid_access and it thus later fails to convert the access. This patch fixes it by explicitly checking the various fields of bpf_sock_addr in sock_addr_is_valid_access. I checked the other ctx structures and is_valid_access functions and didn't find any other similar cases. Other cases of (properly handled) padding are covered in new tests in a subsequent patch. Fixes: 1cedee13d25a ("bpf: Hooks for sys_sendmsg") Reported-by: syzbot+136ca59d411f92e821b7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=136ca59d411f92e821b7 Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon --- net/core/filter.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 63f3baee2daf..8342f810ad85 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -9284,13 +9284,17 @@ static bool sock_addr_is_valid_access(int off, int size, return false; info->reg_type = PTR_TO_SOCKET; break; - default: - if (type == BPF_READ) { - if (size != size_default) - return false; - } else { + case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock_addr, user_family): + case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock_addr, family): + case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock_addr, type): + case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sock_addr, protocol): + if (type != BPF_READ) return false; - } + if (size != size_default) + return false; + break; + default: + return false; } return true; -- 2.43.0