The current implementation seems incorrect and does NOT match the comment above, use bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() instead. Fixes: 1dad391daef1 ("bpf, arm64: use bpf_prog_pack for memory management") Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 52ffe115a8c4..4ef9b7b8fb40 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -3064,8 +3064,7 @@ void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *prog) * before freeing it. */ if (jit_data) { - bpf_arch_text_copy(&jit_data->ro_header->size, &jit_data->header->size, - sizeof(jit_data->header->size)); + bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(jit_data->ro_header, jit_data->header); kfree(jit_data); } prog->bpf_func -= cfi_get_offset(); -- 2.27.0