Since its introduction in commit ce098da1497c ("skbuff: Introduce slab_build_skb()"), __slab_build_skb() never used the @skb argument. Remove it and adapt both callers. No functional change intended. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj --- net/core/skbuff.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index 3041f7a3560d58270dffdf923825758f274c8511..4893350bc80a105e0a2870f0de03a687c1117217 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c @@ -384,8 +384,7 @@ static inline void __finalize_skb_around(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data, skb_set_kcov_handle(skb, kcov_common_handle()); } -static inline void *__slab_build_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data, - unsigned int *size) +static inline void *__slab_build_skb(void *data, unsigned int *size) { void *resized; @@ -418,7 +417,7 @@ struct sk_buff *slab_build_skb(void *data) return NULL; memset(skb, 0, offsetof(struct sk_buff, tail)); - data = __slab_build_skb(skb, data, &size); + data = __slab_build_skb(data, &size); __finalize_skb_around(skb, data, size); return skb; @@ -435,7 +434,7 @@ static void __build_skb_around(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data, * using slab buffer should use slab_build_skb() instead. */ if (WARN_ONCE(size == 0, "Use slab_build_skb() instead")) - data = __slab_build_skb(skb, data, &size); + data = __slab_build_skb(data, &size); __finalize_skb_around(skb, data, size); } -- 2.49.0