Sashiko pointed out that kfree_rcu() was called before rcu_assign_pointer() in handling the comment extension. Fix the order so that rcu_assign_pointer() called first. Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik --- net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c index 3706b4a85a0f..a531b654b8d9 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_core.c @@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ ip_set_init_comment(struct ip_set *set, struct ip_set_comment *comment, if (unlikely(c)) { set->ext_size -= sizeof(*c) + strlen(c->str) + 1; - kfree_rcu(c, rcu); rcu_assign_pointer(comment->c, NULL); + kfree_rcu(c, rcu); } if (!len) return; @@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ ip_set_comment_free(struct ip_set *set, void *ptr) if (unlikely(!c)) return; set->ext_size -= sizeof(*c) + strlen(c->str) + 1; - kfree_rcu(c, rcu); rcu_assign_pointer(comment->c, NULL); + kfree_rcu(c, rcu); } typedef void (*destroyer)(struct ip_set *, void *); -- 2.39.5