The comment in `Request` describing the four ownership states referred to states 2 and 3 as "B" and "C", which are inconsistent with the numbering scheme used throughout the same comment block. Update the labels to use "2" and "3" to match the existing numbered list. Fixes: a307bf1db5448 ("rust: block: convert `block::mq` to use `Refcount`") Signed-off-by: Hsiu Che Yu --- rust/kernel/block/mq/request.rs | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rust/kernel/block/mq/request.rs b/rust/kernel/block/mq/request.rs index ce3e30c81cb5..75d3fdf896e0 100644 --- a/rust/kernel/block/mq/request.rs +++ b/rust/kernel/block/mq/request.rs @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ /// back ownership to the block layer. /// /// Note that the driver can still obtain new `ARef` even if there is no `ARef`s in existence by -/// using `tag_to_rq`, hence the need to distinguish B and C. +/// using `tag_to_rq`, hence the need to distinguish 2 and 3. /// /// The states are tracked through the private `refcount` field of /// `RequestDataWrapper`. This structure lives in the private data area of the C --- base-commit: b4e07588e743c989499ca24d49e752c074924a9a change-id: 20260428-fix-docs-mq-req-d2a0fe1b6471 Best regards, -- Hsiu Che Yu